Assessment of gender-specific preventive cardiovascular knowledge among house staff: Potential impact on cardiovascular management

Background: Gender differences in cardiovascular prevention and treatment may be related to physicians' level of postgraduate training and gender.Objectives: This study was designed to assess resident physician knowledge concerning general and gender-specific preventive cardiology topics and to determine whether there were differences in that knowledge based on the physicians' level of postgraduate training or gender.Methods: A 29-item true/false questionnaire was administered to residents in a large, university-based internal medicine residency program. All questions were drawn from evidence-based practice guidelines, and a subset of questions pertained to gender-specific issues in cardiovascular disease prevention. Scores on the overall test and gender-specific subset were computed as a percentage of correct answers. Differences were compared by postgraduate year (PGY) of training and physician gender.Results: Of the 190 eligible residents, 159 (88 men, 67 women, 4 not specified) completed the questionnaire. Overall test scores differed significantly by PGY (PGY-1, 83.4% correct answers; PGY-2, 52.9%; PGY-3, 65.3%; P < 0.001 for each paired comparison), but did not differ significantly by physician gender (males, 73.5%; females, 70.0%). Performance on gender-specific items also differed by PGY (PGY-1, 72.2% vs PGY-2, 20.0%; P < 0.001; and PGY-1, 72.2% vs PGY-3, 45.1%; P < 0.001). Knowledge of gender-specific preventive cardiology did not differ significantly by physician gender (males, 56.4%; females, 49.0%).Conclusions: Residents in PGY-1 had better knowledge of preventive cardiology as assessed using this questionnaire than did residents in PGY-2 or PGY-3. Knowledge of general and gender-specific cardiology topics was not related to physician gender.