首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1篇
  免费   0篇
  2007年   1篇
排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Aspects of mosasaur dental ontogeny are well preserved in many fossils of these giant marine squamates. Replacement teeth on the tooth-bearing elements (TBEs) first appear as small enamel crowns positioned posterolingual to the attached tooth (posterolabial for the pterygoid). Several developing crowns, of progressively larger size, are aligned in rows relating to a specific tooth position. The crowns rest in a dental groove that varies in width and depth depending on the TBE. The crown closest to the attached tooth is always the largest and is found in a small resorption pit. As resorption proceeds, the pit expands in volume (cementum and alveolar bone), and the crown increases in size and settles into the pit. Once mature crown size is achieved, the dentine root and cementum portion of the root develop rapidly, the attached tooth is lost and the replacement tooth erupts out of the alveolus. Mosasaurid teeth develop along a 'zig-zag'-shaped movement path: horizontally along the dental groove, down into the alveolus, and up and out of the alveolus prior to attachment to the alveolar wall. At no point in mosasaurid tooth development are the crowns observed in a horizontal position. The mosasaurid dental lamina appears to have been a continuous strip of dental epithelium as it is in other squamates. Mosasaurid tooth attachment is thecodont (histologically and geometrically) not subpleurodont. Most aspects of mosasaurid tooth attachment and ontogeny are autapomorphic for the group.  © 2007 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2007, 149 , 687–700.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号