排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
David L. Hull 《Biology & philosophy》1999,14(4):481-504
Karl Popper has been one of the few philosophers of sciences who has influenced scientists. I evaluate Popper's influence on our understanding of evolutionary theory from his earliest publications to the present. Popper concluded that three sorts of statements in evolutionary biology are not genuine laws of nature. I take him to be right on this score. Popper's later distinction between evolutionary theory as a metaphysical research program and as a scientific theory led more than one scientist to misunderstand his position on evolutionary theory as a scientific theory. In his later work Popper also introduced what he took to be improvements of evolutionary theory. Thus far these improvements have had almost no influence on evolutionary biology. I conclude by examining the influence of Popper on the reception of cladistic analysis. 相似文献
2.
C. Stepniak 《Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift》1984,26(2):215-217
ROY and ROY have shown that for any linear hypothesis H being not testable it is possible to construct a testable hypothesis which is implied by H. A maximal testable hypothesis implied by H is presented. 相似文献
3.
One of the major criticisms of optimal foraging theory (OFT) is that it is not testable. In discussions of this criticism opposing parties have confused methodological concepts and used meaningless biological concepts. In this paper we discuss such misunderstandings and show that OFr has an empirically testable, and even well-confirmed, general core theory. One of our main conclusions is that specific model testing should not be aimed at proving optimality, but rather at identifying the context in which certain types of behaviour are optimal. To do this, it is necessary to be aware of the assumptions made in testing a model. The assumptions that are explicitly stated in the literature up to now do not completely cover the actual assumptions made in testing OFT models in practice. We present a more comprehensive set of assumptions. Although all the assumptions play a role in testing models, they are not of equal status. Crucial assumptions concern constraints and the relation between fitness and currency. Therefore, it is essential to make such assumptions testable in practice. We show that a more explicit relationship between OFT modelling and evolutionary theory can help with this. Specifically, phylogeny reconstruction and population dynamic modelling can and should be used to formulate assumptions concerning constraints and currencies. 相似文献
4.
The Structure of Evolution by Natural Selection 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
We attempt a conclusive resolution of the debate over whether the principle of natural selection (PNS), especially conceived
as the `principle' of the `survival of the fittest', is a tautology. This debate has been largely ignored for the past 15 years
but not, we think, because it has actually been settled. We begin by describing the tautology objection, and situating the
problem in the philosophical and biology literature. We then demonstrate the inadequacy of six prima facie plausible reasons for believing that the tautology debate has been satisfactorily resolved (the PNS is strictly a methodological
principle; scientific theories can contain tautologies; the scope of the PNS has been reduced; theories should be understood
as models and not exceptionless laws; the widespread acceptance of the propensity interpretation of fitness; and the abandonment
of operationalism and verificationism). We proceed to a detailed discussion of Brandon's law (D) describing the PNS, and show
that law (D) seriously misrepresents the structure of evolution by natural selection. In the final sections, we provide and
defend a novel reinterpretation of the structure of the principle (or, we prefer, model) of evolution by natural selection. 相似文献
1