Immunological responses and viral modulatory effects of vaccination with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) expressing structural and regulatory transgenes of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac32H/J5M)

Background The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) vectors expressing structural (gag/pol, env) and regulatory (tat, rev, nef) genes of SIVmac251/32H‐J5 (rMVA‐J5) were assessed. Methods Immunization with rMVA constructs (2.5 × 10⁷ IU) 32, 20 and 8 weeks pre‐challenge was compared with 32 and 20 weeks but with a final boost 8 weeks pre‐challenge with 2 × 10⁶ fixed‐inactivated HSC‐F4 cells infected with SIVmac32H. Controls received rMVA vectors expressing an irrelevant transgene or were naïve challenge controls. All received 10 MID₅₀ SIVmac32H/J5 intravenously. Results Vaccinates immunized with rMVA‐J5 exhibited significant, albeit transient, control of peak primary viraemia despite inconsistent and variable immune responses elicted by vaccination. Humoral and cellular responses to Env were most consistent, with lower responses to Nef, Rev and Tat. Increasing titres of anti‐vaccinia neutralizing antibodies reflected the number and dose of rMVA inoculations. Conclusions Improved combinations of viral vectors are required to elicit appropriate immune responses to control viral replication.     

Effect of vaccination with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing structural and regulatory genes of SIV(macJ5) on the kinetics of SIV replication in cynomolgus monkeys

The efficacy of a multicomponent vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara constructs (rMVA) expressing structural and regulatory genes of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV(mac251/32H/J5)) was investigated in cynomolgus monkeys, following challenge with a pathogenic SIV. Vaccination with rMVA-J5 performed at week 0, 12, and 24 induced a moderate proliferative response to whole SIV, a detectable humoral response to all but Nef SIV antigens, and failed to induce neutralizing antibodies. Two months after the last boost, the monkeys were challenged intravenously with 50 MID50 of SIV(mac251). All control monkeys, previously inoculated with non-recombinant MVA, were infected by week two and seroconverted by weeks four to eight. In contrast a sharp increase of both humoral and proliferative responses at two weeks post-challenge was observed in vaccinated monkeys compared to control monkeys. Although all vaccinated monkeys were infected, vaccination with rMVA-J5 appeared to partially control viral replication during the acute and late phase of infection as judged by cell- and plasma-associated viral load.     

Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit

Neutralizing effects of antibodies targeting the C-terminal stalk (S2) subunit of the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus have previously been reported, although its mechanism remained elusive. In this study, high titered mouse antisera against the N-terminal globular (S1) and S2 subunits of the S protein were generated and total immunoglobulin G (IgG) was purified from these antisera. The efficiency of these purified IgGs in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding were compared quantitatively using virus neutralization assay and a previously developed cell-based receptor binding assay, respectively. We demonstrated that anti-S1 IgG neutralizes the virus and binds to the membrane associated S protein more efficiently than anti-S2 IgG does. Moreover, both anti-S1 and anti-S2 IgGs were able to abolish the binding between S protein and its cellular receptor(s), although anti-S1 IgG showed a significantly higher blocking efficiency. The unexpected blocking ability of anti-S2 IgG towards the receptor binding implied a possible role of the S2 subunit in virus docking process and argues against the current hypothesis of viral entry. On the other hand, the functional roles of the previously reported neutralizing epitopes within S2 subunit were investigated using an antigen specific antibody depletion assay. Depletion of antibodies against these regions significantly diminished, though not completely abolished, the neutralizing effects of anti-S2 IgG. It suggests the absence of a major neutralizing domain on S2 protein. The possible ways of anti-S2 IgGs to abolish the receptor binding and the factors restricting anti-S2 IgGs to neutralize the virus are discussed.