Comparison of the Molecular Forms of the Kex2/Subtilisin-Like Serine Proteases SPC2, SPC3, and Furin in Neuroendocrine Secretory Vesicles Reveals Differences in Carboxyl-Terminus Truncation and Membrane Association

Abstract: The molecular forms and membrane association of SPC2, SPC3, and furin were investigated in neuroendocrine secretory vesicles from the anterior, intermediate, and neural lobes of bovine pituitary and bovine adrenal medulla. The major immunoreactive form of SPC2 was the full-length enzyme with a molecular mass of 64 kDa. The major immunoreactive form of SPC3 was truncated at the carboxyl terminus and had a molecular mass of 64 kDa. Full-length 86-kDa SPC3 with an intact carboxyl terminus was found only in bovine chromaffin granules. Immunoreactive furin was also detected in secretory vesicles. The molecular masses of 80 and 76 kDa were consistent with carboxyl-terminal truncation of furin to remove the transmembrane domain. All three enzymes were distributed between the soluble and membrane fractions of secretory vesicles although the degree of membrane association was tissue specific and, in the case of SPC3, dependent on the molecular form of the enzyme. Significant amounts of membrane-associated and soluble forms of SPC2, SPC3, and furin were found in pituitary secretory vesicles, whereas the majority of the immunoreactivity in chromaffin granules was membrane associated. More detailed analyses of chromaffin granule membranes revealed that 86-kDa SPC3 was more tightly associated with the membrane fraction than the carboxyl terminus-truncated 64-kDa form.     

Immortalized hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) neurons: A new tool for dissecting the molecular and cellular basis of LHRH physiology

Summary 1. Two LHRH neuronal cell lines were developed by targeted tumorigenesis of LHRH neuronsin vivo. These cell lines (GN and GT-1 cells) represent a homogeneous population of neurons. GT-1 cells have been further subcloned to produce the GT1-1, GT1-3, and GT1-7 cell lines. While considerable information is accumulating about GT-1 cells, very little is currently known about the characteristics and responses of GN cells.2. By both morphological and biochemical criteria, GT-1 cells are clearly neurons. All GT-1 cells immunostain for LHRH and the levels of prohormone, peptide intermediates, and LHRH in the cells and medium are relatively high.3. GT-1 cells biosynthesize, process, and secrete LHRH. Processing of pro-LHRH appears to be very similar to that reported for LHRH neuronsin vivo. At least four enzymes may be involved in processing the prohormone to LHRH.4. LHRH neurons are unique among the neurons of the central nervous system because they arise from the olfactory placode and grow back into the preoptic-anterior hypothalamic region of the brain. Once these neurons reach this location, they send their axons to the median eminence. With respect to the immortalized neurons, GN cells were arrested during their transit to the brain. In contrast, GT-1 cells were able to migrate to the preoptic-anterior hypothalamic region but were unable correctly to target their axons to the median eminence. These problems in migration and targeting appear to be due to expression of the simian virus T-antigen.5. While GT-1 cells are a homogeneous population of neurons, they are amenable to coculture with other types of cells. Coculture experiments currently under way should help not only to reveal some of the molecular and cellular cues that are important for neuronal migration and axonal targeting, but they should also highlight the nature of the cellular interactions which normally occurin situ.6. GT-1 cells spontaneously secrete LHRH in a pusatile manner. The interpulse interval for LHRH from these cells is almost identical to that reported for release of LH and LHRHin vivo. GT-1 cells are interconnected by both gap junctions and synapses. The coordination and synchronization of secretion from these cells could occur through these interconnections, by feedback from LHRH itself, and/or by several different compounds that are secreted by these cells. One such compound is nitric oxide.7. GT-1 cells have Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cl^– channels. Polymerase chain reaction experiments coupled with Southern blotting and electrophysiological recordings reveal that GT-1 cells contain at least five types of Ca²⁺ channels. R-type Ca²⁺ channels appear to be the most common type of channel and this channel is activated by phorbol esters in the GT-1 cells.8. LHRH is secreted from GT-1 cells in response to norepinephrine, dopamine, histamine, GABA (GABA-A agonists), glutamate, nitric oxide, neuropeptide Y, endothelin, prostaglandin E₂, and activin A. Phorbol esters are very potent stimulators of LHRH secretion. Inhibition of LHRH release occurs in response to LHRH, GABA (GABA-B agonists), prolactin, and glucocorticoids.9. Compared to secretion studies, far fewer agents have been tested for their effects on gene expression. All of the agents which have been tested so far have been found either to repress LHRH gene expression or to have no effect. The agents which have been reported to repress LHRH steady-state mRNA levels include LHRH, prolactin, glucocorticoids, nitric oxide, and phorbol esters. While forskolin stimulates LHRH secretion, it does not appear to have any effect on LHRH mRNA levels.     

Posttranslational Maturation of the Prohormone Convertase SPC3 In Vitro

Abstract: The subtilisin-like prohormone convertase SPC3 is likely to play a role in the biosynthesis of a variety of biologically active peptides. SPC3 undergoes a series of posttranslational processing events during its biosynthesis. Multiple forms have been identified that show varying degrees of truncation at the carboxyl terminus. In this study we show that the 86-kDa form of recombinant SPC3 with an intact carboxyl terminus can undergo rapid carboxyl-terminus truncation to produce a 64-kDa form. We have defined the optimal conditions for carboxyl-terminus truncation in vitro. The carboxyl-terminus truncation reaction was less calcium sensitive, active over a broader pH range, and showed differences in inhibitor sensitivity compared with the enzymatic activities of full-length and truncated forms of SPC3 toward a fluorescent peptide substrate. Increases in enzymatic activity of 86-kDa SPC3 were also measured over a time frame consistent with conversion to the 64-kDa form. However, similar specific activities for both forms of the enzyme suggest such activity increases may not be due to carboxyl-terminus truncation. The different enzymatic properties of the major molecular forms of SPC3 highlight the importance of understanding the molecular events regulating carboxyl-terminal processing of this endoprotease.     

Studies on the regioselectivity and kinetics of the action of trypsin on proinsulin and its derivatives using mass spectrometry

Human M-proinsulin was cleaved by trypsin at the R³¹R³²–E³³ and K⁶⁴R⁶⁵–G⁶⁶ bonds (B/C and C/A junctions), showing the same cleavage specificity as exhibited by prohormone convertases 1 and 2 respectively. Buffalo/bovine M-proinsulin was also cleaved by trypsin at the K⁵⁹R⁶⁰–G⁶¹ bond but at the B/C junction cleavage occurred at the R³¹R³²–E³³ as well as the R³¹–R³²E³³ bond. Thus, the human isoform in the native state, with a 31 residue connecting C-peptide, seems to have a unique structure around the B/C and C/A junctions and cleavage at these sites is predominantly governed by the structure of the proinsulin itself. In the case of both the proinsulin species the cleavage at the B/C junction was preferred (65%) over that at the C/A junction (35%) supporting the earlier suggestion of the presence of some form of secondary structure at the C/A junction. Proinsulin and its derivatives, as natural substrates for trypsin, were used and mass spectrometric analysis showed that the k_cat./K_m values for the cleavage were most favourable for the scission of the bonds at the two junctions (1.02 ± 0.08 × 10⁵ s^− 1 M^− 1) and the cleavage of the K²⁹–T³⁰ bond of M-insulin-RR (1.3 ± 0.07 × 10⁵ s^− 1 M^− 1). However, the K²⁹–T³⁰ bond in M-insulin, insulin as well as M-proinsulin was shielded from attack by trypsin (k_cat./K_m values around 1000 s^− 1 M^− 1). Hence, as the biosynthetic path follows the sequence; proinsulin → insulin-RR → insulin, the K²⁹–T³⁰ bond becomes shielded, exposed then shielded again respectively.     

The ductal origin of structural and functional heterogeneity between pancreatic islets

Islets form in the pancreas after the first endocrine cells have arisen as either single cells or small cell clusters in the epithelial cords. These cords constitute the developing pancreas in one of its earliest recognizable stages. Islet formation begins at the time the cords transform into a branching ductal system, continues while the ductal system expands, and finally stops before the exocrine tissue of ducts and acini reaches its final expansion. Thus, islets continuously arise from founder cells located in the branching and ramifying ducts. Islets arising from proximal duct cells locate between the exocrine lobules, develop strong autonomic and sensory innervations, and pass their blood to efferent veins (insulo-venous efferent system). Islets arising from cells of more distal ducts locate within the exocrine lobules, respond to nerve impulses ending at neighbouring blood vessels, and pass their blood to the surrounding acini (insulo-acinar portal system). Consequently, the section of the ductal system from which an islet arises determines to a large extent its future neighbouring tissue, architecture, properties, and functions. We note that islets interlobular in position are frequently found in rodents (rats and mice), whereas intralobularly-located, peripheral duct islets prevail in humans and cattle. Also, we expound on bovine foetal Laguesse islets as a prominent foetal type of type 1 interlobular neuro-insular complexes, similar to neuro-insular associations frequently found in rodents. Finally, we consider the probable physiological and pathophysiological implications of the different islet positions within and between species.     

Specificity of the dynorphin-processing endoprotease: comparison with prohormone convertases

The cleavage specificity of a monobasic processing dynorphin converting endoprotease is examined with a series of quench fluorescent peptide substrates and compared with the cleavage specificity of prohormone convertases. A dynorphin B-29-derived peptide, Abz-Arg-Arg-Gln-Phe-Lys-Val-Val-Thr-Arg-Ser-Glneddnp (where Abz is o-aminobenzoyl and eddnp is ethylenediamine 2,4-dinitrophenyl), that contains both dibasic and monobasic cleavage sites is efficiently cleaved by the dynorphin converting enzyme and not cleaved by two propeptide processing enzymes, furin and prohormone convertase 1. A shorter prorenin-related peptide, Dnp-Arg-Met-Ala-Arg-Leu-Thr-Leu-eddnp, that contains a monobasic cleavage site is cleaved by the dynorphin converting enzyme and prohormone convertase 1 and not by furin. Substitution of the P1' position by Ala moderately affects cleavage by the dynorphin-processing enzyme and prohormone convertase 1. It is interesting that this substitution results in efficient cleavage by furin. The site of cleavage, as determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry, is N-terminal to the Arg at the P1 position for the dynorphin converting enzyme and C-terminal to the Arg at the P1 position for furin and prohormone convertase 1. Peptides with additional basic residues at the P2 and at P4 positions also serve as substrates for the dynorphin converting enzyme. This enzyme cleaves shorter peptide substrates with significantly lower efficiency as compared with the longer peptide substrates, suggesting that the dynorphin converting enzyme prefers longer peptides that contain monobasic processing sites as substrates. Taken together, these results suggest that the cleavage specificity of the dynorphin converting enzyme is distinct but related to the cleavage specificity of the prohormone convertases and that multiple enzymes could be involved in the processing of peptide hormones and neuropeptides at monobasic and dibasic sites.     

Proprotein convertases regulate activity of prostate epithelial cell differentiation markers and are modulated in human prostate cancer cells

Prostate derived factor (PDF) is a member of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily proteins involved in differentiation of the prostate epithelium. Proprotein convertases (PCs) such as furin are thought to mediate the processing of TGF-beta superfamily. In the present study, we demonstrated for the first time that human prostate cancer cell lines differentially synthesize and secret prostate derived factor (PDF), and that PDF secreted by LNCaP is processed by PCs. Exposure of LNCaP cells to the decanoyl-Arg-Val-Lys-Arg-chloromethylketone (CMK), a synthetic furin-like protease inhibitor, inhibited PDF processing and resulted in the loss of luminal cell phenotype and induction of basal cell phenotype in LNCaP cells as demonstrated by alternations in the expression of cytokeratins 8, 14, 18, and 19, markers of prostate epithelial cell differentiation. These results suggest that proprotein convertases may be involved in the regulation of prostate epithelial cell differentiation, and may be an important target of prostate cancer therapy.     

Multifactorial Modulation of TRH Metabolism

1. Thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH), synthesized in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN), is released in response to physiological stimuli through medianeminence nerve terminals to control thyrotropin or prolactin secretion from the pituitary.2. Several events participate in the metabolism of this neuropeptide: regulation of TRH biosynthesis and release as well as modulation of its inactivation by the target cell.3. Upon a physiological stimulus such as cold stress or suckling, TRH is released and levels of TRH mRNA increase in a fast and transient manner in the PVN; a concomitant increase in cfos is observed only with cold exposure.4. Hypothalamic cell cultures incubated with cAMP or phorbol esters show a rise in TRH mRNA levels; dexamethasone produces a further increase at short incubation times.TRH mRNA are thus controlled by transsynaptic and hormonal influences.5. Once TRH is released, it is inactivated by a narrow specificity ectoenzyme, pyroglu-tamyl peptidase II (PPII).6. In adenohypophysis, PPII is subject to stringent control: positive by thyroid hormones and negative by TRH; other hypothalamic factors such as dopamine and somatostatin also influence its activity.7. These combined approaches suggest that TRH action is modulated in a coordinate fashion.     

Production of bioactive peptides in an in vitro system

An in vitro system for the preparation of bioactive peptides is described. This system couples three different posttranslational modification enzymes, prohormone convertases (PCs), carboxypeptidase E, and peptidyl alpha-amidating enzyme, to transform recombinant precursors into bioactive peptides. Three different precursors, mouse proopiomelanocortin (mPOMC), rat proenkephalin (rPE), and human proghrelin, were used as model systems. The conversion of mPOMC and rPE to smaller peptide products was measured by radioimmunoassay. After optimization of the system, excellent efficiency was obtained: about 85% of starting mPOMC was converted to des-acetyl alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH). For proenkephalin, 75 and 96% yields were obtained for the opioid peptides Met-RGL and Met-enk, respectively. Cell-based assays demonstrated that in-vitro-generated des-acetyl alpha-MSH successfully activated the melanocortin 4 receptor. Proghrelin digestion was used to screen the specificity of PC cleavage and to confirm the cleavage site by mass spectroscopy. Mature ghrelin was produced by human furin, mouse prohormone convertase 1, and human prohormone convertase 7 but not by mouse prohormone convertase 2. These results demonstrate that our in vitro system (1) can produce peptides in quantities sufficient to carry out functional analyses, (2) can be used to determine the specificity of proprotein convertases on recombinant precursors, and (3) has the potential to identify novel peptide functions on both known and orphan G-protein-coupled receptors.