Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of cell wall reconstitution in recalcitrant (grapevine) and regenerating (tobacco) leaf protoplasts

Summary To identify possible reasons that may contribute to recalcitrance in plant protoplasts, the time course of new cell wall deposition was studied by scanning electron microscopy in protoplasts of a recalcitrant species, the grapevine. Results showed that microfibrils were developed after 2 days of culture, that complete cell wall formation occurred on Day 6 to 7 of protoplast culture, and its ultrastructural appearance was identical to that of grapevine leaf-derived callus cells. In addition, a comparative study was undertaken on [U-¹⁴C]glucose uptake and incorporation in ethanol-soluble, cellulosic, and noncellulosic polysaccharide fractions in protoplasts of grapevine and of a readily regenerating species, tobacco, during culture. There was a significantly higher [U-¹⁴C]glucose uptake by tobacco than by grapevine protoplasts. The label distribution in the ethanol-soluble, cellulosic, and noncellulosic fractions of newly synthesized cell walls differed quantitatively between the two species. In particular, the labeled glucose incorporated in the noncellulosic cell wall fraction was threefold greater in tobacco than in grapevine protoplasts. Differences were also revealed in the monosaccharide composition of this fraction between the two species. Addition of dimethyl sulfoxide to the culture medium resulted in a dramatic increase in [U-¹⁴C]glucose uptake by grapevine protoplasts, whereas it exhibited a limited effect in tobacco protoplasts. It showed no effect on the ultrastructural characteristics of new cell wall nor on the incorporation rate of labeled glucose in the cellulosic and noncellulosic cell wall fractions.     

Comparative Histochemical Analysis of Cell Wall Polysaccharides by Enzymatic and Chemical Extractions of Two Fruits

A protocol for extracting polysaccharides from cell walls has been modified and used to analyze histochemically two fruits with opposite characteristics. Grapes are nonclimacteric fruits and are harvested at full maturity. In contrast, kiwi fruits are climacteric and are harvested and consumed before they are physiologically mature. The two fruits were analyzed histochemically using two protocols. One method is defined as chemical, and is based on subsequential extractions of pectins by chemical agents. The other is defined as enzymatic because it removes pectins using pectinase followed by hot ammonium oxalate. In both protocols, two types of hemicellulosic polymers are removed by 1 M and 4 M/KOH leaving a cellulosic residue on the slide. Both protocols remove the same amount of pectins, thus confirming their precision. The sum of hemicellulose and the cellulosic insoluble residue are equivalent using the two methods, but the relative amounts of the cellulose and hemicellulosic polymers were dependent upon the method of extraction. When the enzyme was used to extract the pectins, there was less cellulose and more hemicellulose. The removal of polysaccharides by ammonium oxalate and by guanidinethio-cyanate in the enzymatic and the chemical protocols, respectively, yielded approximately the same amount of removed material.

Similar results were obtained from both fruits. Grape, being softer than kiwi fruit, was relatively richer in pectic substances and less rich in hemicellulose and cellulose polymers. No difference in cell wall material could be ascribed to the different ripening habits.     

OCCURRENCE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ARABINOGALACTAN‐LIKE PROTEINS AND HEMICELLULOSES IN MICRASTERIAS (STREPTOPHYTA)1

The cell wall of the green alga Micrasterias denticulata Bréb. ex Ralfs (Desmidiaceae, Zygnematophyceae, Streptophyta) was investigated to obtain information on the composition of component polysaccharides and proteoglycans to allow comparison with higher plants and to understand cell wall functions during development. Various epitopes currently assigned to arabinogalactan‐proteins (AGPs) of higher plants could be detected in Micrasterias by immuno TEM and immunofluorescence methods, but the walls did not bind the β‐d ‐glycosyl‐Yariv (β‐GlcY) reagent. Secretory vesicles and the primary wall were labeled by antibodies against AGPs (JIM8, JIM13, JIM14). Dot and Western blot experiments indicated a proteoglycan nature of the epitopes recognized, which consisted of galactose and xylose as major sugars by high performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC‐PAD). Epitopes of alkali‐soluble polysaccharides assigned to noncellulosic polysaccharides in higher plants could be detected and located in the wall during its formation. The polyclonal anti‐xyloglucan (anti‐XG) antibody labeled primary and secondary wall of Micrasterias, whereas the monoclonal antibody CCRC‐M1, directed against the fucose/galactose side chain of xyloglucan (XyG), did not recognize any structures. Labeling by anti‐XG antibody at the trans‐sites of the dictyosomes and at wall material containing vesicles indicated that secretion of the epitopes occurred similar to higher plants. The presence of (1→3, 1→4)‐β‐glucan (mixed linked glucan) in the secondary cell wall but not in the primary cell wall of Micrasterias could be demonstrated by an antibody recognizing this glucan type, whereas (1→3)‐β‐glucan (callose) could not be detected. The analytical results revealed that alkali‐soluble polysaccharides in the secondary wall of Micrasterias consist mostly of (1→3, 1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucan.     

Comparative Histochemical Analysis of Cell Wall Polysaccharides by Enzymatic and Chemical Extractions of Two Fruits

A protocol for extracting polysaccharides from cell walls has been modified and used to analyze histochemically two fruits with opposite characteristics. Grapes are nonclimacteric fruits and are harvested at full maturity. In contrast, kiwi fruits are climacteric and are harvested and consumed before they are physiologically mature. The two fruits were analyzed histochemically using two protocols. One method is defined as chemical, and is based on subsequential extractions of pectins by chemical agents. The other is defined as enzymatic because it removes pectins using pectinase followed by hot ammonium oxalate. In both protocols, two types of hemicellulosic polymers are removed by 1 M and 4 M/KOH leaving a cellulosic residue on the slide. Both protocols remove the same amount of pectins, thus confirming their precision. The sum of hemicellulose and the cellulosic insoluble residue are equivalent using the two methods, but the relative amounts of the cellulose and hemicellulosic polymers were dependent upon the method of extraction. When the enzyme was used to extract the pectins, there was less cellulose and more hemicellulose. The removal of polysaccharides by ammonium oxalate and by guanidinethio-cyanate in the enzymatic and the chemical protocols, respectively, yielded approximately the same amount of removed material.

Similar results were obtained from both fruits. Grape, being softer than kiwi fruit, was relatively richer in pectic substances and less rich in hemicellulose and cellulose polymers. No difference in cell wall material could be ascribed to the different ripening habits.