Physical Anthropology and the dental and medical specialties

The rise of two sub-specialties in Physical Anthropology traces back to the Anatomy Departments of Schools of Medicine in Germany and France during the nineteenth century. The study of human diversity in bones and bodies was largely by medically-trained anatomists. There developed Medical Anthropology and Dental Anthropology, employing osteometry and craniometry on the skeleton, somatometry and cephalometry on the living body. As a result cross-sectional studies gave way to longitudinal studies and X-ray techniques were added to purely mensurational procedures. In Medical Anthropology the specialties most directly concerned are pediatrics, plastic surgery, endocrinology, and orthopaedics. In Dental Anthropology the specialties most directly concerned are pedodontics, orthodontics, oral surgery, and prosthodontics. The contributions of Physical Anthropology to each is discussed.     

PKD1基因与抑癌基因P53多态性与非综合征性唇腭裂的关联研究

目的:探讨多囊性肾病基因1(polystic kidney disease,PKD1)多态位点rs8049367与抑癌基因P53(anti-oncogene P53)多态位点rs4791774单核苷酸多态性与中国北方人群非综合征性唇腭裂(NSCL/P)的相关性。方法:运用聚合酶链式反应-连接酶检测反应(PCR-LDR)的检测方法,对602例NSCL/P患者和510例对照人群的PKD1基因的rs8049367位点和抑癌基因P53的rs4791774位点进行基因分型。利用SPSS12.0软件分析PKD1基因,抑癌基因P53多态性与NSCL/P的相关性。结果:rs8049367位点和rs4791774位点基因型及基因频率在两组的分布中差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:PKD1基因的rs8049367位点和抑癌基因P53的rs4791774位点单核苷酸多态性可能与中国北方人群非综合征性唇腭裂的发生无相关性。     

A digenic cause of cleft lip in A-strain mice and definition of candidate genes for the two loci

BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate, CL(P), is a common human birth defect with a complex unknown genetic cause. The mouse model is the "A/-" strains. Our previous studies mapped two loci: clf1 on Chr11 and clf2 on Chr13--with a strong genetic maternal effect on the level of risk. Here we test the hypothesis that CL(P) is digenic and identify candidate genes for clf1 and clf2. METHODS: We observed E14 CL(P) frequencies in backcross (BC1) embryos from a new cross of A/WySn to AXB-4/Pgn and from test crosses of three new "congenic RI" lines. Using new polymorphic markers from genes and our mapping panels of segregants and RI strains, we identified the candidate genes for clf1 and clf2. We sequenced the coding region of Ptch in A/WySn cDNA. RESULTS: Seventy new BC1 CL(P) segregants (4%) were obtained, as predicted. All three new congenic RI lines homozygous for both clf1 and clf2 had A/WySn-level CL(P) frequencies (10-30%) in test crosses. The clf1 region contains 10 known genes (Arf2, Cdc27, Crhr1, Gosr2, Itgb3, Mapt, Myl4, Nsf, Wnt3, and Wnt9b). The clf2 region contains 17 known genes with human orthologs. Both regions contain additional potential genes. No causal mutation in Ptch coding sequence was found. CONCLUSIONS: In A-strain mice, nonsyndromic CL(P) is digenic, suggesting that nonsyndromic human CL(P) may also be digenic. The orthologous human genes are on 17q (clf1) and 9q, 8q and 5p (clf2), and good candidate genes are WNT3 or WNT9B (17q), and PTCH (9q) or MTRR (5p).     

The role of multiple drug resistance proteins in fetal and/or placental protection against teratogen-induced orofacial clefting

Previous studies have shown a role for multiple drug resistance proteins in protecting the fetus from a limited number of teratogens. We have expanded the number of proteins and teratogens examined by comparing the influence of the mdr1a and mdr2 proteins on teratogen-induced orofacial clefting using their respective knockouts in crosses with the A/J, high susceptibility strain. Western blots identified the presence of mdr1a and possibly mdr2 in the placenta and fetus. The mdr1a knockout, on its unique genetic background showed lower, similar, and higher incidences of clefting compared to A/J for Dilantin, hydrocortisone (HC), and 6-aminonicotinamide (6-AN), respectively. The mdr2 knockout did not affect 6-AN clefting when compared to A/J. In reciprocal crosses, when corrected for increased spontaneous clefting, maternally inherited A/J susceptibility genes predominated over the effects of the maternal absence of mdr1a (with 6-AN). Unlike mdr1a, which had a direct effect in the fetus as shown by genotyping of affected versus unaffected fetuses, an effect of mdr2 in the fetus was not found. The mdr1a knockout was backcrossed to the A/J inbred strain for 11 generations (congenics) to eliminate genetic background effects. Reciprocal crosses showed no maternal effect from the lack of mdr1a, confirming that mdr1a expression in the fetus, rather than the placenta, protects the fetus from teratogens. Mdr2 seems not to be involved in the protection of the fetus from teratogens.