Improved expansion of T cells in culture when isolated with an equipment-free,high-throughput,flow-through microfluidic module versus traditional density gradient centrifugation

Background

The isolation of lymphocytes – and removal of platelets (PLTs) and red blood cells (RBCs) – from an initial blood sample prior to culture is a key enabling step for effective manufacture of cellular therapies. Unfortunately, currently available methods suffer from various drawbacks, including low cell recovery, need for complex equipment, potential loss of sterility and/or high materials/labor cost.

Blood progenitor cell separation from clinical leukapheresis product by magnetic nanoparticle binding and magnetophoresis

Positive selection of CD34+ blood progenitor cells from circulation has been reported to improve patient recovery in applications of autologous transplantation. Current magnetic separation methods rely on cell capture and release on solid supports rather than sorting from flowing suspensions, which limits the range of therapeutic applications and the process scale up. We tested CD34+ cell immunomagnetic labeling and isolation from fresh leukocyte fraction of peripheral blood (leukapheresis) using the continuous quadrupole magnetic flow sorter (QMS), consisting of a flow channel (SHOT, Greenville, IN) and a quadrupole magnet with a maximum field intensity (B(o)) of 1.42 T and a mean force field strength (S(m)) of 1.45 x 10(8) TA/m(2). Both the sample magnetophoretic mobility (m) and the inlet and outlet flow patterns highly affect the QMS performance. Seven commercial progenitor cell labeling reagent combinations were quantitatively evaluated by measuring magnetophoretic mobility of a high CD34 expression cell line, KG-1a, using the cell tracking velocimeter (CTV). The CD34 Progenitor Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) showed the strongest labeling of KG-1a cells and was selected for progenitor cell enrichment from 11 fresh and 11 cryopreserved clinical leukapheresis samples derived from different donors. The CD34+ cells were isolated with a purity of 60-96%, a recovery of 18-60%, an enrichment rate of 12-169, and a throughput of (1.7-9.3) x 10(4) cells/s. The results also showed a highly regular dependence of the QMS performance on the flow conditions that agreed with the theoretical predictions based on the CD34+ cell magnetophoretic mobility.     

Autologous cryopreserved leukapheresis cellular material for chimeric antigen receptor–T cell manufacture

Tisagenlecleucel, a CD19-specific autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–T cell therapy, is efficacious for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The tisagenlecleucel manufacturing process was initially developed in an academic setting and subsequently transferred to industry for qualification, validation and scaling up for global clinical trials and commercial distribution. Use of fresh leukapheresis material was recognized early on in the transfer process as a challenge with regard to establishing a global supply chain. To maximize manufacturing success rates and to overcome logistical challenges, cryopreservation was adapted into the Novartis manufacturing process from the beginning of clinical trials. Tisagenlecleucel manufactured in centralized facilities with cryopreserved leukapheresis material has been used successfully in global clinical trials at more than 50 clinical centers in 12 countries. Cryopreservation provides flexibility in scheduling leukapheresis when the patient's health is optimal to provide T cells; it also provides protection from external factors, such as shipping delays, and removes manufacturing time constraints. Several studies were performed to establish comparability of fresh versus cryopreserved leukapheresis material, to evaluate and optimize the cryopreservation process, to determine the optimal temperature and maximum hold time prior to cryopreservation and to determine the optimal temperature range for shipment and storage. Using the current validated industry manufacturing process, high success rates were achieved with regard to manufacturing tisagenlecleucel batches that met specifications and were released to patients. Consistent product quality and positive clinical outcomes support the use of cryopreserved non-mobilized peripheral mononuclear blood cells collected using leukapheresis for CAR-T cell manufacturing.     

Clinical outcomes of therapeutic leukapheresis in acute promyelocytic leukemia: A single-center retrospective cohort study

BackgroundIn acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), increased cell burden in the peripheral blood due to either the disease itself or early treatment with all-trans retinoic acid could cause hyperleukocytosis (HL) before induction chemotherapy. However, therapeutic leukapheresis has seldom been used because of concerns of subsequent coagulopathy after this invasive procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of leukapheresis in APL, especially for efficacy and safety.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed newly diagnosed patients with APL from January 2009 to March 2022. Among 323 patients, 85 had white blood cell count above 40 × 10⁹/L before induction chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients were initially treated with leukapheresis, whereas the other 46 were not. Clinical and laboratory parameters between these groups were compared.ResultsThere was a trend toward favorable 30-day survival rate for the leukapheresis group compared with the non-leukapheresis group (76.9% and 67.4%; P = 0.24). The complications including subsequent intensive unit care (P = 0.23), severe hemorrhagic events (P = 0.13) showed no significant differences between the two groups. The patients were divided into subcohorts, and the survival rates of the leukapheresis and non-leukapheresis groups were 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.8%–100.0%) versus 58.3% (95% CI, 38.6%–78.1%) (P = 0.03) in “sequential HL” and 76.7% (95% CI, 61.5%–91.8%) versus 54.8% (95% CI, 37.3%–72.4%) (P = 0.03) in “symptomatic HL,” respectively. Moreover, in the “sequential HL” subcohort, the cumulative incidence of differentiation syndrome and following adverse events were significantly lower in the leukapheresis group.ConclusionsIn APL with “sequential HL” or “symptomatic HL” from either the disease itself or the effect of all-trans retinoic acid, therapeutic leukapheresis could be applied to reduce leukemic cell burden without significant risks.