The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes

In Britain, much emphasis has been placed on conserving butterfly species in specialized habitats, since this is where most of its threatened butterflies exist, whilst the wider countryside has been largely overlooked. However, there is increasing awareness that small improvements to the dominant landscape could potentially reap huge benefits to the populations of many of Britains butterfly species. Recent studies have also stressed the importance of the landscape scale in the conservation of butterflies in small fragmented habitats. In this paper, we examine data from a variety of sources and conclude that the importance of shelter in open landscapes may be underestimated since recording is often restricted to the optimum conditions suggested by the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In less favourable conditions, butterflies may place greater reliance on those components of the landscape offering shelter. In light of the current policy of agricultural de-intensification we discuss how modifications to our current landscapes could benefit a wide range of species.     

Mammals,agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside – what are the putative benefits?

• 1 The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors.
• 2 The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri‐environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set‐aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside for mammals.
• 3 We review how establishment and management options within agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place.
• 4 At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri‐environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements.
• 5 We suggest that agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects.

     

Historical and environmental influences on hedgerow snail faunas

In three areas of the English Midlands, composition and diversity of hedgerow snail faunas are influenced both by historical and environmental differences between hedges. Soil aciditv and climate are the most important environmental factors. Hedges originating in or near woodland have richer faunas than those planted in open fields, and some snail species are indicators of woodland origin. Snail diversity also increases with the age of the hedge, but this effect is slight in hedges over 100 years old. It is suggested that these differences are primarily due to the poor dispersal of snails rather than to existing environmental differences between hedges of differing age and origins, and the results are compared with the very similar ones obtained for plants. Historical influences on the distribution ol slow-dispersing organisms may be of very general importance, even in comparisons of adjacent habitats with considerable temporal stability.     

Pollen availability and abundance of predatory phytoseiid mites on natural and secondary hedgerows

Mites occurring on a number ofnatural and secondary (i.e., planted) hedgerowslocated in north-eastern Italy were monitoredwith particular attention being paid tophytoseiids (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Pollendiversity and abundance were analysed tohighlight potential relationships betweenpollen availability and phytoseiids. Secondaryhedgerows were structured in modules containinga single species (field maple, hornbeam,dogwood, hazel, and elderberry) andmodules containing a mixture of theabove-mentioned species. These hedgerows werelocated in an experimental farm where they werecontiguous to a vineyard. Natural hedgerowswere located in the same area. The pollen ofPoaceae was the most important component ofnon-arboreal pollen (NAP), and that ofelderberry of arboreal pollen (AP). Pollendiversity was higher on natural than onsecondary hedgerows. Generally, pollendensities reached relatively high levels fromlate April to late June and decreased insummer. Pollen was more abundant on naturalthan on secondary hedgerows and phytoseiidabundance showed a similar trend. On elderberryand hornbeam in natural hedgerows a potentialrelationship between pollen availability andthe abundance of phytoseiids, in particular ofEuseius finlandicus (Oudemans) was found.Experimental pollen applications increased thefecundity and the abundance of this species.     

Independent effects of habitat loss,habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on forest‐dependent birds

Aim Habitat loss and fragmentation are amongst the greatest threats to biodiversity world‐wide. However, there is still little evidence on the relative influence of these two distinct processes on biodiversity, and no study, to date, has investigated the independent contribution of structural connectivity in addition to habitat loss and fragmentation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the independent effects of habitat loss (the decrease in total amount of habitat), habitat fragmentation per se (habitat subdivision) and structural connectivity (in the form of hedgerow networks) on the distribution of seven resident forest‐dependent birds in central Italy. Location Central Italy. Methods We strategically selected 30 landscapes (each of 16 km² in size) with decreasing total amount of forest cover and with contrasting configuration of patches and contrasting lengths of hedgerow networks. Presence/absence of birds in each landscape unit was studied through point counts. Results The amount of forest cover in the landscape had the strongest relative influence on birds’ occupancy, whilst habitat subdivision played a negligible role. Structural connectivity and the geographic position of the landscape unit played a relatively important role for four species. Main conclusions Our study shows the importance of disentangling the contribution of different landscape properties in determining distribution patterns. Our results are consistent with the fact that halting habitat loss and carrying out habitat restoration should be conservation priorities, since habitat loss is the main factor affecting the distribution of the target species; implementation of structural connectivity through hedgerows, instead, should be evaluated with caution since its contribution is secondary to the predominant role of habitat loss.     

Spatial distribution of bibionid larvae in agricultural grassland

The distribution of bibionid larvae in agricultural grassland was investigated. They tend to occur sporadically and at low population density. More detailed sampling within a field showed that numbers were highest adjacent to a hedgerow with most being found 6–11 m from the hedge. Log variance/log mean relationships were established for counts of Bibio johannis and Dilophus febrilis larvae collected from soil cores in grassland. Both species were highly aggregated. An area of grassland (160 cm × 80 cm) was divided into 128 soil blocks and B. johannis larvae extracted. Almost all larvae were associated with aggregations. The two-phase mozaic method of Pielou (1974) was applied to larval counts from different sized concentrically collected soil cores. Larval patches were not randomly distributed. Time-lapse video studies of bibionid larvae were made and showed both aggregation and processional behaviour. This was associated with chemical stimulation which is probably used to maintain larval groupings in the field. There was evidence for two levels of aggregation. The first is due to groups of larvae arising from eggs laid by a single female and the second, larger scale, aggregation is due to factors that influence the distribution of adult flies.