Roles of synorganisation,zygomorphy and heterotopy in floral evolution: the gynostemium and labellum of orchids and other lilioid monocots

A gynostemium, comprising stamen filaments adnate to a syncarpous style, occurs in only threc groups of monocots: the large family Orchidaceae (Asparagales) and two small genera Pauridia (Hypoxidaceae: Asparagales) and Corsia (Corsiaceae, probably in Liliales), all epigynous taxa. Pauridia has actinomorphic (polysymmetric) flowers, whereas those of Corsia and most orchids are strongly zygomorphic (monosymmetric) with a well-differentiated labellum. In Corsia the labellum is formed from the outer median tepal (sepal), whereas in orchids it is formed from the inner median tepal (petal) and is developmentally adaxial (but positionally abaxial in orchids with resupinate flowers). Furthermore, in orchids zygomorphy is also expressed in the stamen whorls, in contrast to Corsia. In Pauridia a complete stamen whorl is suppressed, but the 'lost' outer whorl is fused to the style. The evolution of adnation and zygomorphy are discussed in the context of the existing phylogenetic framework in monocotyledons. An arguably typological classification of floral terata is presented, focusing on three contrasting modes each of peloria and pseudopeloria. Dynamic evolutionary transitions in floral morphology are assigned to recently revised concepts of heterotopy (including homeosis) and heterochrony, seeking patterns that delimit developmental constraints and allow inferences regarding underlying genetic controls. Current evidence suggests that lateral heterotopy is more frequent than acropetal heterotopy, and that full basipetal heterotopy does not occur. Pseudopeloria is more likely to generate a radically altered yet functional perianth, but is also more likely to cause acropetal modification of the gynostemium. These comparisons indicate that there are at least two key genes or sets of genes controlling adnation, adaxial stamen suppression and labellum development in lilioid monocots; at least one is responsible for stamen adnation to the style (i.e. gynostemium formation), and another controls adaxial stamen suppression and adaxial labellum formation in orchids. Stamen adnation to the style may be a product of over-expression of the genes related to epigyny (i.e. a form of hyper-epigyny). If, as seems likely, stamen-style adnation preceded zygomorphy in orchid evolution, then the flowers of Pauridia may closely resemble those of the immediate ancestors of Orchidaceae, although existing molecular phylogenetic data indicate that a sister-group relationship is unlikely. The initial radiation in Orchidaceae can be attributed to the combination of hyper-epigyny, zygomorphy and resupination, but later radiations at lower taxonomic levels that generated the remarkable species richness of subfamilies Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae are more likely to reflect more subtle innovations that directly influence pollinator specificity, such as the development of stalked pollinaria and heavily marked and/or spur-bearing labella.     

The questionable affinities of Corsia (Corsiaceae): evidence from floral anatomy and pollen morphology

The floral anatomy and pollen morphology of Corsia are described in the context of its systematic relationships. Flowers of Corsia are epigynous, lack septal nectaries and possess a large labellum formed from the outer median tepal (sepal). The labellum is highly vascularized and has a prominent outgrowth (callus) that is apparently nectiiferous in some species of section Sessilis , although not in section Unguiculatis . The six fertile stamens are proximally fused to the style, forming a gynostemium. This combination of labellum and gynostemium is otherwise found only in Orchidaceae (Asparagales), but the orchid labellum is formed from the opposite median inner tepal, and is therefore not homologous with that of Corsia . The three genera of Corsiaceae ( Corsia , Arachnitis and Corsiopsis ) are markedly different in some respects; e.g. only Corsia has a gynostemium. However, they share a unique synapomorphy in the presence of a labellum formed from the outer median tepal (sepal). Corsia and Arachnitis are also similar in pollen sexine sculpturing. Among other putative relatives, the range of morphological similarities between Corsia and Campynemataceae (Liliales) tends to support recent preliminary inferences from molecular data that they are closely related, but a relationship with Thismia (Dioscoreales) cannot be discounted. Both Campynemataceae and Thismia share similarities with Corsia , including epigyny, absence of septal nectaries, presence of tepal nectaries, and pollen morphology. © 2002 Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society , 2002, 138 , 315–324.     

寒兰花器官发生及花发育过程的研究

为了揭示寒兰的成花机理,利用石蜡切片和花芽实体解剖记录了濒危植物寒兰花芽分化和发育的过程,并着重观察唇瓣和合蕊柱早期及中期的发育(在合蕊柱伸长之前)。结果表明:寒兰花芽分化沿着花序轴从下往上可分为4个阶段:花序原基分化,花原基分化,花被片分化和合蕊柱形成。唇瓣分化分为3个阶段:褶片分化,侧裂片分化和色块形成。唇瓣侧裂片和褶片产生较晚,与退化雄蕊可能没有关系。在合蕊柱形成过程中,首先分化出花药,随后分化产生中心皮顶部,侧心皮顶部,并形成花柱道,最终分化出蕊喙和黏盘。     

The floral morphology and ontogeny of some Chinese representatives of orchid subtribe Orchidinae

The flower structure and development of ten species in six genera of the orchid subtribe Orchidinae are described and illustrated by scanning electron micrographs. Particular attention is given to the structure of the gynostemium, which for most species is interpreted from ontogenetic data. All the species studied here share a series of features, e.g. the sequence of tepal and anther initiation, the shape and position of the anther, the presence of auricles and basal bulges, the three-lobed condition of the median carpel apex and the lateral lobes of the median carpel embracing the basal ends of the thecae. However, the form and structure of the three carpel apices are most varied in the later development stages or in the adult flower. The genus Hemipilia shows a series of peculiar characters that are quite different from those of the other genera in Orchidinae. The peculiar structure and development of the viscidia in both Amitostigma and Neottianthe indicate that both of them are different from other genera in Orchidinae. The adult floral morphology shows that the genera Galearis and Chusua are not congeneric with Orchis. The separation of the lateral lobes of the rostellum in most genera studied here as well as in the Brachycorythis group from South Africa suggests that this is the ancestral state in the subtribe Orchidinae. In contrast, the conjoining of lateral lobes in Dactylorhiza and Orchis is suggested as a derived character.     

Floral anatomy in Dypsis (Arecaceae–Areceae): a case of complex synorganization and stamen reduction

Male (staminate) flowers of Dypsis possess either six or three stamens and/or staminodes, in contrast to most other palms, in which the basic stamen number is six (although polyandry is also common in palms). Significant variation among the tristaminate forms, both in stamen morphology and stamen position with respect to the perianth parts, indicates that stamen reduction from six to three has occurred more than once, and possibly several times within Dypsis. A few species include teratological forms with zygomorphic flowers; for example, Dypsis lantzeana normally possesses three antesepalous stamens, but in some specimens only the median outer (abaxial) stamen is expressed, perhaps indicating incipient zygomorphy correlated with complex synorganization. Inclusion of earlier historic genera such as Neophloga and Chrysalidocarpus within a broadly circumscribed Dypsis appears to be justified, although the informal taxonomic groupings within Dypsis require review, in particular the taxonomic significance of the different types of anther morphology. The discovery here that adnation of staminodes to the pistillode (complex synorganization) occurs in species other than D. mirabilis opens further questions about the taxonomic utility of this character in Dypsis, in which stamen/staminode development and adnation are apparently unusually labile. Such androecial–gynoecial adnation is otherwise rare in palms, as also in other monocots, in which probably the best‐known example occurs in orchids. Septal nectaries are present in some, but not all, staminate flowers in species of Dypsis. Dypsis bejofo is exceptional in that in staminate flowers the pistillode is distally bulbous and bears three prominent modified supralocular septal nectaries. Female (pistillate) flowers in Dypsis are syncarpous, normally pseudomonomerous (as in many other Arecoideae), and possess septal nectaries that effectively delimit the carpel margins and indicate insect pollination. There is a central solid transmitting tissue that extends from the placenta to three stylar canals. The stylar canals of the two sterile carpels are apparently functional, in addition to that of the fertile carpel. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 143 , 115?133.     

Delayed autonomous self‐pollination in two Japanese varieties of Epipactis helleborine (Orchidaceae)

The terrestrial orchid Epipactis helleborine is a morphologically variable species with a wide geographical distribution. It is found throughout Europe and continues eastwards to Siberia, China and Japan. It is usually pollinated by social wasps and displays the morphological characteristics of an outcrossing species. In warm, temperate areas of Japan, E. helleborine often appears in alpine or subalpine regions, and has never been found in low‐altitude forests, except for coastal pine forests. The coastal population of E. helleborine is often classified at the variety level, as E. helleborine var. sayekiana, and the inland populations are known as E. helleborine var. papillosa. It is possible that E. helleborine var. sayekiana possesses a distinctive selfing strategy, as its autonomous self‐pollination has evolved in dry habitats, such as coastal dunes. The present study investigated the pollination biology of E. helleborine var. sayekiana and var. papillosa to detect differences in their reproductive systems. Unexpectedly, both E. helleborine var. papillosa and E. helleborine var. sayekiana were found to possess a self‐pollination strategy and were therefore rarely visited by insects. Self‐pollination occurs at the end of the flowering season and probably acts to ensure pollination even if insect‐mediated pollination fails. Moreover, there are no floral differences between E. helleborine var. papillosa and E. helleborine var. sayekiana. These observations suggest that it is not necessary to distinguish between these two varieties. Furthermore, E. helleborine var. papillosa was pollinated by hoverflies, suggesting that E. helleborine var. papillosa is probably biologically distinct from its mother species, E. helleborine. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 173 , 733–743.