Search for Clues to the Evolutionary Meaning of Ciliate Phylogeny*†

SYNOPSIS. Progress in ciliatology and in allied fields may demystify ciliate phylogenetics. Concentration on hymenostomes (mainly Tetrahymena and Paramecium) may have obscured directional features of ciliate physiology in phylogenetic problems. Therefore, means are suggested for “domesticating” the presumptively primitive, predominantly marine, sand-dwelling gymnostomes having nondividing diploid macronuclei. The prize quarry is the marine psammophile Stephanopogon whose homokaryotic condition may mark it as a living fossil. Eventual axenic cultivation of these “primitive” ciliates may be aided by use as food of easily grown photosynthetic prokaryotes, some isolated from the marine sulfuretum or adjacent aerobic muds and sands where “karyorelictid” ciliates flourish. We assume that: (a) the macronucleus evolved as a coordinator of chemical and physical signals, for efficient detection of food and toxins; (b) oral structures evolved meanwhile as sensors as well as mechanical food-gatherers. This conjunction enabled complexity of adaptive behavior and evolutionary success. Ciliate origins cannot be considered apart from origin(s) of phagotrophy and its underlying versatile heterotrophy. Because of the well developed heterotrophy in some photosynthetic prokaryotes (including several proposed as food organisms), they are viewed as alternatives to blue-green algae as forebears of eukaryotes. Nor can ciliate origins be considered apart from origin(s) of eukaryotes. A check of these assumptions—that Stephanopogon and gymnostomes with nondividing macronuclei are primitive—may be forthcoming from sequencing amino acids in certain key enzymes, given an adequate sampling of ciliates, flagellates (especially dinoflagellates and cryptomonads), lower fungi, and photosynthetic prokaryotes other than blue-green algae.