The diversity of temporal niches in mammals

The division of animals into those that are diurnal (day-active) and those that are nocturnal (night-active) is widely recognized. However, closer examination of the selection of temporal niches by mammalian species reveals the existence of a gradient of diurnality between and within species, wherein “diurnal” and “nocturnal” are merely the opposite ends of a continuum. Evidence against a simple diurnal - nocturnal dichotomy includes the existence of species without any preference for time of day, species with a crepuscular pattern of activity, species containing both diurnal and nocturnal individuals, species containing individuals that spontaneously shift from a nocturnal to a diurnal activity pattern, species showing degrees of diurnality greater or smaller than those of other species, organismal variables exhibiting degrees of diurnality greater or smaller than those of other variables, and species having different temporal patterns under the effects of different environmental variables. Research on the neural processes responsible for temporal niche selection has revealed no fundamental difference between the circadian clocks of diurnal and nocturnal animals, but recent findings suggest that different output pathways from the clock in a given species may operate with different circadian phases, thus providing an explanation for why different body functions in the same individual are subjected to different temporal niche selections.     

Rhythms in a diurnal brain

The neural mechanisms governing circadian rhythms generate patterns of behavior and physiology that are very different in diurnal and nocturnal species. Here we review data bearing on the issue of where and how in the brain these differences might be generated. Molecular data from several species now confirm that the central circadian clock, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), is coupled to the light - dark cycle in the same manner in nocturnal and diurnal species, indicating that the fundamental differences arise from mechanisms coupling the clock to effector systems. Major differences in this coupling become apparent only when one steps beyond the SCN to look at brain regions that directly or indirectly receive input from it. This review focuses on our work on brain regions and cell populations to which the SCN projects in the diurnal species Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats). We have found rhythms in the numbers of cells containing cFos, or PER1, in a number of these regions, and the patterns of these rhythms are always different from those seen in nocturnal laboratory rats. In some areas these rhythms are simply inverted in the two species, but in other extra-SCN regions the phase of the rhythms in these two species differs in less extreme ways. Taken together, these data suggest that there is no single simple switch that causes some animals to be nocturnal and others to be diurnal. Rather, the differences likely emerge through a variety of mechanisms operating within and downstream of the cells to which the SCN projects.     

Eye size in geckos: Asymmetry, allometry, sexual dimorphism, and behavioral correlates

The function of the vertebrate eye depends on its absolute size, and the size is presumably adapted to specific needs. We studied the variation of eye size at all levels, from intra-individual to inter-specific, in lid- less, spectacled, gecko lizards (Gekkonomorpha). We mea sured 1,408 museum specimens of 62 species, representing subfamilies Diplodactylinae, Gekkoninae, and Sphaerodactylinae. Intra-individually, eye size showed significant directional asymmetry in Stenodactylus sthenodactylus. A latitudinal study of six species confirmed that during postnatal ontogeny eye size undergoes conventional negative allometry; the slope is steeper among adults than among juveniles, expressing the need of juveniles for relatively larger eyes. Within species with sexual size dimorphism, commonly the larger sex possessed larger eyes in absolute terms but not relative to head-and-body length. Interspecifically, eye size showed negative allometry, with slope significantly steeper than those of intraspecific ontogenetic allometry, again expressing the need of juveniles for relatively larger eyes and showing that eye-size differences among species do not merely result from body-size differences. Finally, adult eye size varied interspecifically in correlation with parameters of behavioral ecology: eyes were significantly larger in nocturnal than in diurnal species, and significantly larger in cursorial than in scansorial species.     

Sociality in New World hystricognath rodents is linked to predators and burrow digging

The importance of predation and burrow digging in explainingthe evolution of sociality is generally unclear. We focusedon New World hystricognath rodents to evaluate three key predictionsof the predation hypothesis. First, large-bodied surface-dwellingspecies will be more vulnerable because they are more detectable;thus sociality should be associated with body size. Second,surface-dwelling, diurnal species would be more vulnerable topredators than nocturnal species; thus sociality should be associatedwith the evolution of diurnality. Third, species living in openhabitats will be more vulnerable; thus sociality should evolvein species living in open habitats. Regarding the importanceof burrows, we tested if species that dig burrows can benefitfrom communal labor; thus, sociality should be associated withburrow digging. All traits had significant phylogenetic signal,thus comparative analyses should explicitly address this. Ina comparative analysis on independent contrasts we found thatsociality was correlated with body size (larger species weremore social), diurnality (diurnal species were more social),and burrowing (burrowing species were more social), but we foundno effect of overhead plant cover of habitat on sociality inhystricognath rodents. Somewhat different results were foundwhen we analyzed the raw data. Taken together, our results providesupport for a link between predation risk, burrow digging, andsociality in this group.     

Activity Rhythms and Masking Response in the Diurnal Fat Sand Rat Under Laboratory Conditions

Daily rhythms are heavily influenced by light in two major ways. One is through photic entrainment of a circadian clock, and the other is through a more direct process, referred to as masking. Whereas entraining effects of photic stimuli are quite similar in nocturnal and diurnal species, masking is very different. Laboratory conditions differ greatly from what is experienced by individuals in their natural habitat, and several studies have shown that activity patterns can greatly differ between laboratory environment and natural condition. This is especially prevalent in diurnal rodents. We studied the daily rhythms and masking response in the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus), a diurnal desert rodent, and activity rhythms of Tristram’s jird (Meriones tristrami), a nocturnal member of the same subfamily (Gerbillinae). We found that most sand rats kept on a 12?h:12?h light-dark (LD) cycles at two light intensities (500 and 1000?lux) have a nocturnal phase preferences of general activity and higher body temperature during the dark phase. In most individuals, activity was not as stable that of the nocturnal Tritram’s jirds, which showed a clear and stable nocturnal activity pattern under the same conditions. Sand rats responded to a 6-h phase advance and 6-h phase delay as expected, and, under constant conditions, all tested animals free ran. In contrast with the nocturnal phase preference, fat sand rats did not show a masking response to light pulses during the dark phase or to a dark pulse during the light phase. They did, however, have a significant preference to the light phase under a 3.5?h:3.5?h LD schedule. Currently, we could not identify the underlying mechanisms responsible for the temporal niche switch in this species. However, our results provide us with a valuable tool for further studies of the circadian system of diurnal species, and will hopefully lead us to understanding diurnality, its mechanisms, causes, and consequences.     

Red white and blue – bright light effects in a diurnal rodent model for seasonal affective disorder

Despite the common use of bright light exposure for treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD), the underlying biology of the therapeutic effect is not clear. Moreover, there is a debate regarding the most efficacious wavelength of light for treatment. Whereas according to the traditional approach full-spectrum light is used, recent studies suggest that the critical wavelengths are within the range of blue light (460 and 484 nm). Our previous work shows that when diurnal rodents are maintained under short photoperiod they develop depression- and anxiety-like behavioral phenotype that is ameliorated by treatment with wide-spectrum bright light exposure (2500 lux at the cage, 5000 K). Our current study compares the effect of bright wide-spectrum (3,000 lux, wavelength 420- 780 nm, 5487 K), blue (1,300 lux, wavelength 420-530 nm) and red light (1,300 lux, wavelength range 600-780 nm) exposure in the fat sand rat (Psammomys Obesus) model of SAD. We report results of experiments with six groups of sand rats that were kept under various photoperiods and light treatments, and subjected to behavioral tests related to emotions: forced swim test, elevated plus maze and social interactions. Exposure to either intense wide-spectrum white light or to blue light equally ameliorated depression-like behavior whereas red light had no effect. Bright wide-spectrum white light treatment had no effect on animals maintained under neutral photoperiod, meaning that light exposure was only effective in the pathological-like state. The resemblance between the effects of bright white light and blue light suggests that intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are involved in the underlying biology of SAD and light therapy.