Sexually selected nest-building--Pomatoschistus minutus males build smaller nest-openings in the presence of sneaker males

Both natural selection and sexual selection may act on nest-building. We tested experimentally how different regimes of egg-predation and male-male competition influence nest-building before mating, using the marine fish sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Males with sneaker males present built the smallest nest-openings, smaller than males held alone or with Pomatoschistus microps males (which may predate eggs and compete over nest-sites but not compete over fertilizations). Males with visual access to other nest-building males tended also to build smaller openings than males held alone or with P. microps. Males with egg-predators present built nests with openings not differing significantly from any other treatment. Our results indicate that the small nest-openings found in the sneaker male treatment are sexually selected through protection against sneaking or by female choice. Across treatments, time span before a male started to build his nest also explained variation in nest-opening width; males starting late built larger nest-openings.     

Alternative reproductive tactics and status-dependent selection

The status-dependent selection model on alternative reproductivetactics predicts a single switch-point in status: usually allplayers above some status (e.g., competitive ability) shouldpractice the tactic with the higher average payoff, while thosebelow that point should make the "best of a bad job" by practicingthe alternative, lower payoff tactic. Many empirical studiesindeed show a relationship between status and tactic choice,but they do not conform to this single switch-point prediction.I modify the status-dependent selection model by consideringstatus-dependent fitness that is mediated, at least in part,by resource acquisition (e.g., status-based competition forterritories or nuptial gifts). With variation in resource quality,predicted tactic-choice distributions change: a high-statusmale may be territorial on a high-quality territory, a lowerstatus male may practice an alternative tactic, and an evenlower status male may be territorial on a low-quality territory.Tactic choice thus alternates as in many empirical studies andcan appear to be but is not actually stochastic. As the numberof theoretically predicted switch-points increases, however,mixed or mixed-conditional strategies should become more prevalent.While alternative tactics will likely usually differ in meanpayoff, viewing alternative reproductive tactics as inherently"better" or "worse" (e.g., viewing cuckoldry as "worse"—thebest of a bad job) is misleading if not tempered with awarenessthat payoff can vary greatly within tactics and overlap betweentactics.     

Do female pied flycatchers seek extrapair copulations with familiar males? A test of the incomplete knowledge hypothesis

In birds with biparental care, great variation exists in thefrequency of extrapair paternity. Several hypotheses have beenproposed to account for this variation. We tested the incompleteknowledge hypothesis, which states that females are constrainedin their knowledge of male quality and that this influencestheir willingness to engage in extrapair copulations (EPC).By selective removal and release of female pied flycatchersFicedula hypoleuca, we created a situation where females finallysettled with a social mate close to the site where a formersocial mate was breeding. According to the incomplete knowledgehypothesis, this would lower the threshold for females to seekextrapair copulations in cases where their former social matewas of higher quality than the one finally chosen. The hypothesiswas not supported because manipulation of female settlementdid not increase frequency of extrapair paternity, not evenin cases where the female nested close to the previous mateand the current mate apparently was of lower quality becausehe was younger and more dull colored. However, we found that when extrapair paternity did occur, the cuckolder tended tobe a familiar male (i.e., the female's initial social mate).     

Male share of provisioning is not influenced by actual or apparent loss of paternity in western bluebirds

Approximately 45% of western bluebird (Sialia mexicana) femaleshave some chicks in the nest that are not sired by their socialmates. Extrapair fertilizations account for 42% of offspringin these nests and 19% of nestlings overall. I tested the hypothesisthat males reduce nestling provisioning when their certaintyof paternity or share of paternity is reduced. Capture and detentionof socially monogamous males for 1 h or 24 h during the layingperiod reduced males' copulatory access and their ability tomate guard, increasing the frequency with which extrapair malesintruded and attempted to copulate with resident females. Malesdetained during laying did not reduce their share of feedingtrips compared to control males detained during incubation,compared to unmanipulated males, or compared to males that werecaptured but not detained. Males detained on territory for 1h during the laying period did not reduce their share of feedingtrips when they observed male intrusion, nor when they observedtheir mates accepting extrapair copulations. Males that witnessedtheir mates accepting extrapair copulations did not reduce theirshare of risk in provisioning. Genetic fingerprinting at nonexperimentalnests indicated that males also failed to reduce their feedingcontributions when their estimated share of paternity was reduced,even when a helper male was present to reduce the impact onnestlings. These results suggest that male western bluebirdsdo not make significant adjustments in their share of provisioningwhen they have evidence of partial paternity loss. Togetherwith prior results, this study suggests that western bluebirdmales use an all-or-none rule, contributing approximately halfof the parental provisioning at nests, as long they have somecopulatory access to the female during egg laying.     

High frequency of multiple paternity in broods of a socially monogamous cichlid fish with biparental nest defence

In several animal taxa, genetic analyses have demonstrated that social monogamy and biparental brood care do not preclude polygamous reproduction. Few studies have been conducted in fish, but in fish species without alternative reproductive phenotypes, social monogamy was largely congruent with genetic parentage. In contrast to these findings, we report an exceptionally high level of multiple paternity in a socially monogamous cichlid fish with biparental nest defence ( Variabilichromis moorii ), inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial data of 10 broods. Whereas all offspring in a nest shared a common mother, each brood was sired by 2 to > 10 males. None of the inferred sires was assigned a large proportion of the brood. Paternity was estimated as the minimum number of sires required to explain multilocus offspring genotypes, and as the maximum-likelihood number of sires given population allele frequencies. Analysis of simulated brood genotypes suggested that, although these two methods tend to under- and overestimate, respectively, the true number of sires, primary sires with many offspring in a brood would have been detected. Hence, the genetic data indicate that the nest tending males suffer substantial cuckoldry and provide alloparental care for a large number of unrelated fry. We have no data on the social status of the cuckolding males, but due to synchronous spawning of pairs and commitment to brood care of paired males, it is possible that most of the parasitic spawners are solitary males.     

Genetic evidence for cuckoldry in bluegill Lepomis macrochirus

In colonies of bluegill Lepomis macrochirus , some males provide parental care for broods in nests, whereas other males steal fertilizations and do not provide parental care. Using experimental pond populations of bluegill of known genotype (determined through protein electrophoresis), we demonstrate that cuckolder males successfully fertilize eggs in parental male nests. Using electrophoretic techniques to assess the fertilization success of nesting parental male bluegill in Lake Opinicon, Ontario, we demonstrate that paternity of these males ranges from 41% to 100% among four colonies studied. This difference among colonies is related to the density of cuckolder males.     

Dimorphic male midshipman fish: reduced sexual selection or sexual selection for reduced characters?

In most taxa with male dimorphisms, some males are large inbody size with exaggerated secondary sexual characters (exaggeratedmorph), whereas other males in the same population are smalland have reduced secondary sexual characters (reduced morph).What selective pressures cause male dimorphisms? Reduced morphologiesmay result when a) some males develop a morphology that, inthe absence of sexual selection pressures for an exaggeratedmorphology, reduces energetic and developmental costs and/orb) some males opt for an alternative morphology that does wellat an alternative behavioral tactic such as cuckoldry. The 2mechanisms could act together, but each alone is theoreticallysufficient to drive dimorphisms. Here, we tested hypothesis"b" (sexual selection for reduced characters) in the plainfinmidshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. Behavioral plasticity betweenterritoriality and cuckoldry in an exaggerated male morph (typeI) allows for a direct comparison of cuckoldry by exaggeratedmorph males to cuckoldry by reduced morph (type II) males. Comparedwith type I cuckolders, type II cuckolders were able to remainnear the nest for longer periods before being chased by theterritorial type I male, suggesting that the reduced type IImorphology allows type II males to prolong the time before attackby territorial males. Combined with other studies showing arole of sexual selection in maintaining the exaggerated morph,the data support the "sexual selection for reduced characters"hypothesis and elucidate how sexual selection can act in differentways on different males to maintain 2 male morphologies withina single species.