Flow rate and vertical position influence ingestion rates of colonial zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)

1. Zebra mussels aggregate to form dense colonies where, depending on the flow rate, individuals in different vertical locations within the colony may experience restricted food availability. 2. Using ³²P‐labelled Chlamydomonas angulosa, we found ingestion rates of individual mussels located at the surface to exceed those in the bottom of a 6 cm thick colony by up to 75%. 3. Higher velocities (10 and 20 cm s^?1) increased algal delivery to the colony's middle layer (2–4 cm depth), subsequently increasing ingestion rates to equal those in the surface layer, while increasing ingestion only for the smallest mussels in the bottom (4–6 cm). 4. At all vertical locations within the colonies, smaller mussels showed higher ingestion rates per unit mass than larger mussels, particularly at higher flow rates.     

Particularites biologiques et ecologiques du Rotifere Sinantherina socialis (Linne)

Resume Le Rotifère épiphyte et colonial Sinantherina socialis (Linné) prolifère dans la Loire depuis quelques années. Ses caractéristiques biologiques et écologiques ont été étu-diées au laboratoire et sur le terrain.Malgré une répartition des pontes régulière dans le temps, les éclosions manifestent une rythmicité liée a la photopériode. La determination des durées de dévelop-pement embryonnaire et post-embryonnaire, du rythme de ponte, de la dúree de la période de sénilité et de la durée de vie à différentes températures montrent que cette espèce se développe entre 18 et 34°C, avec un optimum à 27°C.Le cycle sexué se caractérise par l'existence de femelle amphoteres, capables d'émettre des oeufs femelles, apparemment amictiques, après avoir produit des oeufs mâles. L'apparition de la micticité est Re aux photopériodes courtes et aux fortes densités de population. Des températures suffisamment élevées (plus de 18°C) ont permis d'obtenir au laboratoire jusqu'à 80% d'éclosions parmi les oeufs de duree.

---

The periphytic and colonial Rotifer Sinantherina socialis is a thermophile species living between 18 and 34°C. The hatching of its eggs takes place daily with a rhythm linked to the photoperiod. The sexual cycle is characterized by the existence of amphoteric females producing two kinds of eggs. The occurence of mictic eggs appeared to be significantly related to short photoperiods and great densities of population.Summary The periphytic and colonial Rotifer Sinantherina socialis has been swarming in the river Loire every summer for some years. Its biological and ecological characteristics have been studied in the laboratory and in the field.Although the eggs are laid regularly in time, the hatching occurs daily with a rhythm linked to the photoperiod. It occurs about 10 hours after the beginning of the light-period with a 16–8 (LD) photoperiod, 11 hours with a 14–10 photoperiod and 12 hours with a 12–12 photoperiod. To explain this hatching synchronisation and shift in time, the existence of a substance synthesized in the egg by night and destroyed by light might be assumed. The mature eggs would be sensitive to this substance, which would have the effect of delaying the hatching.Measurements of the duration of embryonic and post-embryonic development, of the frequency of laying eggs, of the duration of the senility period and of the duration of life, show that this species can grow between 18 and 34°C, the optimum being 27°C.The sexual cycle is characterized by the existence of amphoteric females, capable to emit apparently amictic eggs, after having produced male eggs. The occurrence of mictic reproduction appeared to be significantly related to short photoperiods and great densities of population. Sufficiently high temperatures (more than 18°C) allowed 80 per cent of hatching among the resting eggs in laboratory cultures.

     

ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE FLAGELLAR APPARATUS OF PYROBOTRYS (CHLOROPHYCEAE)1

The flagellar apparatus of Pyrobotrys has a number of features that are typical of the Chlorophyceae, but others that are unusual for this class. The two flagella are inserted at the apex, but they extend to the side of the cell toward the outside of the colony, here designated as the ventral side. Four basal bodies are present, two of which extend into flagella. Four microtubular rootlets alternate between the functional and accessory basal bodies. In each cell, the two ventral rootlets are nearly parallel, but the dorsal rootlets are more widely divergent. The rootlets alternate between two and four microtubules each. A striated distal fiber connects the two functional basal bodies in the plane of the flagella. Two additional, apparently nonstriated, fibers connect the basal bodies proximal to the distal fiber. Another striated fiber is associated with each four-membered rootlet near its insertion into the flagellar apparatus. A fine periodic component is associated with each two-membered rootlet. A rhizoplast-like structure extends into the cell from each of the functional basal bodies. The arrangement of these components does not reflect the 180° rotational symmetry that is usually present in the Chlorophyceae, but appears to be derived from a more symmetrical ancestor. It is suggested that the form of the flagellar apparatus is associated with the unusual colony structure of Pyrobotrys.     

ULTRASTRUCTURE AND TAXONOMIC POSITION OF THE RARE VOLVOCALEAN ALGA,CHLORCORONA BOHEMICA1

Chlorcorona bohemica (Fott) Fott was previously of uncertain taxonomic affinities. The cell to cell connections, which are one of the chief features of the colony, are composed of wall extensions from adjacent cells. The outgrowths are connected by a fine fibrous component extending from wall to wall. The structure of the wall itself and the cell to cell connections, are similar to those of Pyrobotrys, although the connections in the latter are not as elongated. In addition, the flagellar apparatus of Chlorocorona is very similar to the flagellar apparatus of Pyrobotrys, and unlike that in other Chlorophyceae examined. These features suggest that Chlorcorona is closely related to Pyrobotrys and should be referred to the family Spondylomoraceae.     

A COMPARATIVE CYTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF VOLVOCACEAN MATRIX POLYSACCHARIDES1

The colonial matrices of the volvocacean algae were examined for the presence of sulfated and carboxylated polysaccharides. These results were compared to a similar examination of the single-celled Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Dang. The colonial algae examined were Pandorina morum Bory, Eudorina elegans Ehr., Platydorina caudata Kofoid, Pleodorina californica Shaw, Pleodorina illinoisensis Kofoid and Volvox carteri var. nagariensis Iyengar. Alcian blue staining of whole colonies at pH 0.5 and 2.5 showed evidence for the presence of both sulfated and carboxylated polysaccharides in the extracellular matrix. Quantitative measurement of alcian blue bound to solubilized matrices supported the in vivo results. There was a trend toward an increase in sulfated polysaccharides in the more evolutionary advanced forms with the exception of Pleodorina. This trend was readily seen in the sulfate: carboxyl ratios: Pandorina morum—0.4, Eudorina elegans—1.0, Platydorina caudata—2.1 and Volvox carteri—2.2. The acidic nature of the Pleodorina matrix with a sulfate: carboxyl ratio of 0.2 appeared to be more like that of Pandorina rather than that of the more advanced Volvox.     

Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data

Relatively simple foraging radius models have the potential to generate predictive distributions for a large number of species rapidly, thus providing a cost-effective alternative to large-scale surveys or complex modelling approaches. Their effectiveness, however, remains largely untested. Here we compare foraging radius distribution models for all breeding seabirds in Ireland, to distributions of empirical data collected from tracking studies and aerial surveys. At the local/colony level, we compared foraging radius distributions to GPS tracking data from seabirds with short (Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica, and razorbill Alca torda) and long (Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus, and European storm-petrel Hydrobates pelagicus) foraging ranges. At the regional/national level, we compared foraging radius distributions to extensive aerial surveys conducted over a two-year period. Foraging radius distributions were significantly positively correlated with tracking data for all species except Manx shearwater. Correlations between foraging radius distributions and aerial survey data were also significant, but generally weaker than those for tracking data. Correlations between foraging radius distributions and aerial survey data were benchmarked against generalised additive models (GAMs) of the aerial survey data that included a range of environmental covariates. While GAM distributions had slightly higher correlations with aerial survey data, the results highlight that the foraging radius approach can be a useful and pragmatic approach for assessing breeding distributions for many seabird species. The approach is likely to have acceptable utility in complex, temporally variable ecosystems and when logistic and financial resources are limited.     

Inter‐colony foraging area segregation quantified in small colonies of Adélie Penguins

Theoretical models on the movement of colonial animals predict that neighbouring colonies may segregate their foraging areas, and many seabird studies have reported the presence of such segregations. However, these studies have often lacked the appropriate null model to test the effect of neighbouring colonies on foraging areas, especially in small colonies or in short‐ranging species. Here, we examined the foraging areas of Adélie Penguins Pygoscelis adeliae from two neighbouring (2 km apart) colonies by using bird‐borne GPS loggers. The field study was conducted at Hukuro Cove colony (104 pairs) and Mizukuguri Cove colony (338 pairs) in Lützow‐Holm Bay, East Antarctica. We obtained GPS tracks for 504 foraging trips from 48 chick‐rearing Adélie Penguins and quantified the degree of overlap in the foraging areas between two colonies. We also produced simulated movement tracks by using correlated random‐walks assuming no inter‐colony competition and quantified the degree of overlap in the simulated foraging areas. Finally, we compared the results from real GPS tracks with those from simulated tracks to examine the effect of neighbouring colonies on Adélie Penguin movement. The results indicate that the degree of overlap was significantly smaller in real tracks than in simulated tracks. In real tracks, the foraging area of the smaller Hukuro Cove colony extended to the other side of the larger Mizukuguri Cove colony, unlike in simulated tracks. Consequently, we suggest that Adélie Penguins from two neighbouring colonies segregated their foraging areas and that the larger colony appeared to affect the foraging area of the smaller colony.     

Selection against immigrants in wild seabird populations

Immigration is a major demographic parameter shaping population dynamics and is an important driver of eco‐evolutionary patterns, but the fitness consequences for individuals following their settlement to a new population (immigrants) remain poorly tested in wild animal populations, particularly among long‐lived species. Here we show that immigrants have a lower fitness than residents in three wild seabird populations (wandering albatross Diomedea exulans, southern fulmar Fulmarus glacialoides, snow petrel Pagodroma nivea). Across all species and during a 32‐year period, immigrants made on average ?9 to 29% fewer breeding attempts, had 5–31% fewer fledglings, had 2–16% lower breeding success and produced 6–46% fewer recruits. Female immigration and male residency were also favored through differences in breeding performance. We provide evidence for selection against immigrants in wild populations of long‐lived species and our results are consistent with female‐biased dispersal in birds being driven by asymmetric limiting resources and the competitive ability of dispersers vs. non‐dispersers.