Substantial contribution of invertebrates to the diet of a winter seed‐eater,the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus,wintering in a sewage farm in south‐western Poland

We investigated whether the winter diet of a typical seed‐eating bird is hard‐wired in the context of evolutionary hypothesis for granivory. We examined the diet composition of ‘a small‐billed form’ of the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus wintering in a sewage farm in south‐western Poland (Central Europe), where unfrozen wastewater provides various groups of invertebrate prey. The analysis of droppings (N = 151) collected from four different feeding grounds located in reedbeds and grasslands inundated with waste‐water showed the substantial contribution of invertebrates in the diet of reed buntings. Across four sample areas, the frequency of invertebrates in faecal samples ranged between 37% to 80%. In total, we identified 194 animal prey, mainly spiders Araneae (53% of all identified invertebrate prey), and several taxa of Coleoptera (43%). Among plant food (N = 8357 identified items), the most numerous were shells of weed seeds, namely Amaranthus sp. (56.8%), Urtica dioica (22.6%), and Chenopodium sp. (19.6%). Our results showed that, during winter, the reed bunting is not an obligatory seed‐eater. This species may exploit both animal and plant food; hence, our results indicate that the reed buntings wintering in temperate Europe may feed more opportunistically than was previously assumed. © 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 108 , 429–433.     

小鹀和栗鹀静止代谢率的特征

最适的能量平衡是其主要的生存对策之一,它影响着鸟类的分布和丰富度,而鸟类对环境的形态、生理和行为的适应与其能量利用密切相关(Weathers,1997).关于鸟类能量代谢的研究,国内起步较晚,仅见少数报道(李世纯等,1979;邓合黎等,1990),而小鹀和栗鹀的代谢率则尚无报道.为了进一步认识鸟类能量代谢的特征,我们测定了小型鸟小鹀和栗鹀的静止代谢率(restingmetabolic rate,RMR),通过代谢率与体温调节的分析,探讨它们对寒冷环境的适应特征.     

Brood parasitism by cowbirds: risks and effects on reproductive success and survival in indigo buntings

We observed brood parasitism by brown-beaded cowbirds (Molothrusater) on indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea) and estimated dieimpact of parasitism on the success of the individual buntingsin their current nests and in their future survival and reproduction.Rates of parasitism over 8 years were 26.6% in 1040 nests and19.8% in 693 nests in two areas in southern Michigan. Risk ofparasitism was high early in the season; half the bunting nestswere begun after the end of the cowbird season. Risk was independentof female age, plant containing the nest, or habitat The immediatecost of parasitism was 1.19 and 1.26 fewer buntings fledgedper nest. Bunting success was lower in parasitized nests withcowbird eggs (nests were more likely to be deserted or predated),lower when the cowbird nestling failed (nests were more likelyto be predated), and lower when the cowbird fledged (fewer buntingsfledged) compared to nonparasitized nests. Costs were due toremoval of a bunting egg when die cowbird laid its own egg andto competition for parental care of the cowbird and buntingnestlings. Buntings that fledged from nests where a cowbirdalso fledged were only 18% as likely to survive and return totheir natal area in the next year as buntings from nests wherea cowbird did not fledge. Long-term effects of cowbird parasitismon adult breeding later in the season, survival to the nextseason, and reproductive success in the next season were negligiblewhen compared between birds that reared a cowbird and birdsthat reared only a bunting brood, or between birds that wereparasitized and birds that escaped parasitism. The results indicatelittle long-term cost of brood parasitism on individual fitnessof adult buntings beyond the impact on the current nest andthe survival of buntings that fledge from it; nearly all costis to the parasitized brood.