Sap flow characteristics and responses to summer rainfall for Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides in the Loess hilly region of China

As a major driving element of the structure and function of arid and semiarid ecosystems, rainfall is the essential factor limiting plant biological processes. To clarify the characteristics of transpiration and responses to summer rainfall, sap flow density (F_d) of Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides was monitored using thermal dissipation probes. In addition, midday leaf water potential (ψ_m) and leaf stomatal conductance (G_s) were also analyzed to determine water use strategies. The results indicated that the diurnal variation in the normalized F_d values exhibited a single‐peak curve for P. tabulaeformis, while H. rhamnoides showed multiple peaks. The normalized F_d for P. tabulaeformis remained relatively stable regardless of rainfall events. However, there was also a significant increase in the normalized F_d for H. rhamnoides in response to rainfall in June and August (p < .05), although no significant differences were observed in July. The normalized F_d values for P. tabulaeformis and H. rhamnoides fitted well with the derived variable of transpiration, an integrated index calculated from the vapor pressure deficit and solar radiation (R_s), using an exponential saturation function. The differences in fitting coefficients suggested that H. rhamnoides showed more sensitivity to summer rainfall (p < .01) than P. tabulaeformis. Furthermore, during the study period, P. tabulaeformis reduced G_s as soil water decreased, maintaining a relatively constant ψ_m; while H. rhamnoides allowed large fluctuations in ψ_m to maintain G_s. Therefore, P. tabulaeformis and H. rhamnoides should be considered isohydric and anisohydric species, respectively. And more consideration should be taken for H. rhamnoides in the afforestation activities and the local plantation management under the context of the frequently seasonal drought in the loess hilly region.     

Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation

Relatively anisohydric species are predicted to be more predisposed to hydraulic failure than relatively isohydric species, as they operate with narrower hydraulic safety margins. We subjected co‐occurring anisohydric Juniperus monosperma and isohydric Pinus edulis trees to warming, reduced precipitation, or both, and measured their gas exchange and hydraulic responses. We found that reductions in stomatal conductance and assimilation by heat and drought were more frequent during relatively moist periods, but these effects were not exacerbated in the combined heat and drought treatment. Counter to expectations, both species exhibited similar g_s temporal dynamics in response to drought. Further, whereas P. edulis exhibited chronic embolism, J. monosperma showed very little embolism due to its conservative stomatal regulation and maintenance of xylem water potential above the embolism entry point. This tight stomatal control and low levels of embolism experienced by juniper refuted the notion that very low water potentials during drought are associated with loose stomatal control and with the hypothesis that anisohydric species are more prone to hydraulic failure than isohydric species. Because direct association of stomatal behaviour with embolism resistance can be misleading, we advocate consideration of stomatal behaviour relative to embolism resistance for classifying species drought response strategies.     

Drought limitations to leaf‐level gas exchange: results from a model linking stomatal optimization and cohesion–tension theory

We merge concepts from stomatal optimization theory and cohesion–tension theory to examine the dynamics of three mechanisms that are potentially limiting to leaf‐level gas exchange in trees during drought: (1) a ‘demand limitation’ driven by an assumption of optimal stomatal functioning; (2) ‘hydraulic limitation’ of water movement from the roots to the leaves; and (3) ‘non‐stomatal’ limitations imposed by declining leaf water status within the leaf. Model results suggest that species‐specific ‘economics’ of stomatal behaviour may play an important role in differentiating species along the continuum of isohydric to anisohydric behaviour; specifically, we show that non‐stomatal and demand limitations may reduce stomatal conductance and increase leaf water potential, promoting wide safety margins characteristic of isohydric species. We used model results to develop a diagnostic framework to identify the most likely limiting mechanism to stomatal functioning during drought and showed that many of those features were commonly observed in field observations of tree water use dynamics. Direct comparisons of modelled and measured stomatal conductance further indicated that non‐stomatal and demand limitations reproduced observed patterns of tree water use well for an isohydric species but that a hydraulic limitation likely applies in the case of an anisohydric species.     

Risk-taking plants: Anisohydric behavior as a stress-resistance trait

Water scarcity is a critical limitation for agricultural systems. Two different water management strategies have evolved in plants: an isohydric strategy and an anisohydric strategy. Isohydric plants maintain a constant midday leaf water potential (Ψ_leaf) when water is abundant, as well as under drought conditions, by reducing stomatal conductance as necessary to limit transpiration. Anisohydric plants have more variable Ψ_leaf and keep their stomata open and photosynthetic rates high for longer periods, even in the presence of decreasing leaf water potential. This risk-taking behavior of anisohydric plants might be beneficial when water is abundant, as well as under moderately stressful conditions. However, under conditions of intense drought, this behavior might endanger the plant. We will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these two water-usage strategies and their effects on the plant’s ability to tolerate abiotic and biotic stress. The involvement of plant tonoplast AQPs in this process will also be discussed.     

Carbohydrate dynamics and mortality in a piñon‐juniper woodland under three future precipitation scenarios

Drought‐induced forest mortality is an increasing global problem with wide‐ranging consequences, yet mortality mechanisms remain poorly understood. Depletion of non‐structural carbohydrate (NSC) stores has been implicated as an important mechanism in drought‐induced mortality, but experimental field tests are rare. We used an ecosystem‐scale precipitation manipulation experiment to evaluate leaf and twig NSC dynamics of two co‐occurring conifers that differ in patterns of stomatal regulation of water loss and recent mortality: the relatively desiccation‐avoiding piñon pine (Pinus edulis) and the relatively desiccation‐tolerant one‐seed juniper (Juniperus monosperma). Piñon pine experienced 72% mortality after 13–25 months of experimental drought and juniper experienced 20% mortality after 32–47 months. Juniper maintained three times more NSC in the foliage than twigs, and converted NSC to glucose and fructose under drought, consistent with osmoregulation requirements to maintain higher stomatal conductance during drought than piñon. Despite these species differences, experimental drought caused decreased leaf starch content in dying trees of both species (P < 0.001). Average dry‐season leaf starch content was also a good predictor of drought‐survival time for both species (R² = 0.93). These results, along with observations of drought‐induced reductions to photosynthesis and growth, support carbon limitation as an important process during mortality of these two conifer species.     

Water use strategy affects avoidance of ozone stress by stomatal closure in Mediterranean trees—A modelling analysis

Both ozone (O₃) and drought can limit carbon fixation by forest trees. To cope with drought stress, plants have isohydric or anisohydric water use strategies. Ozone enters plant tissues through stomata. Therefore, stomatal closure can be interpreted as avoidance to O₃ stress. Here, we applied an optimization model of stomata involving water, CO₂, and O₃ flux to test whether isohydric and anisohydric strategies may affect avoidance of O₃ stress by stomatal closure in four Mediterranean tree species during drought. The data suggest that stomatal closure represents a response to avoid damage to the photosynthetic mechanisms under elevated O₃ depending on plant water use strategy. Under high-O₃ and well-watered conditions, isohydric species limited O₃ fluxes by stomatal closure, whereas anisohydric species activated a tolerance response and did not actively close stomata. Under both O₃ and drought stress, however, anisohydric species enhanced the capacity of avoidance by closing stomata to cope with the severe oxidative stress. In the late growing season, regardless of the water use strategy, the efficiency of O₃ stress avoidance decreased with leaf ageing. As a result, carbon assimilation rate was decreased by O₃ while stomata did not close enough to limit transpirational water losses.     

Aquaporins and plant transpiration

Although transpiration and aquaporins have long been identified as two key components influencing plant water status, it is only recently that their relations have been investigated in detail. The present review first examines the various facets of aquaporin function in stomatal guard cells and shows that it involves transport of water but also of other molecules such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen peroxide. At the whole plant level, changes in tissue hydraulics mediated by root and shoot aquaporins can indirectly impact plant transpiration. Recent studies also point to a feedback effect of transpiration on aquaporin function. These mechanisms may contribute to the difference between isohydric and anisohydric stomatal regulation of leaf water status. The contribution of aquaporins to transpiration control goes far beyond the issue of water transport during stomatal movements and involves emerging cellular and long‐distance signalling mechanisms which ultimately act on plant growth.     

Beyond soil water potential: An expanded view on isohydricity including land–atmosphere interactions and phenology

Over the past decade, the concept of isohydry or anisohydry, which describes the link between soil water potential (Ψ_S), leaf water potential (Ψ_L), and stomatal conductance (g_s), has soared in popularity. However, its utility has recently been questioned, and a surprising lack of coordination between the dynamics of Ψ_L and g_s across biomes has been reported. Here, we offer a more expanded view of the isohydricity concept that considers effects of vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and leaf area index (A_L) on the apparent sensitivities of Ψ_L and g_s to drought. After validating the model with tree‐ and ecosystem‐scale data, we find that within a site, isohydricity is a strong predictor of limitations to stomatal function, though variation in VPD and leaf area, among other factors, can challenge its diagnosis. Across sites, the theory predicts that the degree of isohydricity is a good predictor of the sensitivity of g_s to declining soil water in the absence of confounding effects from other drivers. However, if VPD effects are significant, they alone are sufficient to decouple the dynamics of Ψ_L and g_s entirely. We conclude with a set of practical recommendations for future applications of the isohydricity framework within and across sites.