Correlation of endoscopic cytology and histology in oesophageal cancer: results in Porto Alegre,RS—Brazil

A retrospective study of oesophageal cytopathology at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), RS, Brazil, from 1989 to 1992 was made to assess the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of endoscopic cytology and biopsy; and study the correlation between cytopathological and histopathological diagnosis. Specimens from 94 patients were available for review. The final diagnosis was based on surgical pathology and follow up. The 81 patients with cancer of the oesophagus had the following sex distribution: 64 males and 17 females (a 3.7–1 ratio). No tumour was found in 13 patients. The following conclusions were made: (i) there is excellent correlation between cytology and histology in oesophageal lesions sampled by endoscopy; (ii) a correct positive cytologic report was obtained in 77 (95%) of the 81 proven oesophageal cancers; a false-negative or unsatisfactory result was given in four patients. A false-positive diagnosis of cancer was not made. There were 13 true-negative reports. These findings result in a sensitivity of 95% with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 90.26–99.74%; a specificity of 100% (CI of 98.5–100%); a positive predictive value of 100% (CI of 99.3–100%); a negative predictive value of 76% (CI of 55.7–96.3%); (iii) a correct positive histological report was obtained in 67 (83%) of the 81 proven oesophageal cancers; a false-negative or unsatisfactory result was given in 14 patients. A false-positive diagnosis of cancer was not made. There were 13 true-negative reports. These findings result in a sensitivity of 83% with 95% CI of 74.82–91.18%; a specificity of 100% (CI of 98.5–100%); a positive predictive value of 100% (CI of 99.25–100%); a negative predictive value of 48% (CI of 29.16–64.84%); (iv) of 81 patients with proven cancer, in 79 (98%) at least one of the methods was positive. In only two patients with cancer were both methods negative. These findings result in a combined sensitivity of 98% (CI of 94.92–100%); a specificity of 100% (CI of 98.5–100%); a positive predictive value of 100% (CI of 99.31–100%); and a negative predictive value of 87% (CI of 70–100%). Our series confirms the value of the combined use of cytology and biopsy for the investigation of oesophageal lesions. However, it should be remembered that even with the combined use of cytology and biopsy there are some tumours that will be negative by both procedures: we had only two such cases, confirming the rarity of such an event.     

经皮椎间盘镜与椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床对比分析

目的:比较椎间盘镜髓核摘除术(microendoscopic discectomy,MED)与椎间孔镜髓核摘除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy,PELD)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的优缺点、安全性及临床疗效。方法:分析和回顾2012.06-2015.06第四军医大学唐都医院骨科收治的共计118例腰椎间盘突出症患者。经严格的进行纳入和排除标准筛选,其中椎间盘镜组共纳入患者46例,椎间孔镜组患者共纳入患者72例。对所有患者均进行了6个月以上的术后随访,记录和分析两组患者在手术时间、卧床时间、出血量、切口长度、疼痛、并发症等指标。并通过Macnab腰椎功能评分等对两组患者的功能恢复进行比较。结果:在术后,两组患者在疼痛评分及功能恢复方面均有明显的提高,且两组之间并无显著统计学差异(P0.05)。而椎间孔镜组在手术时间、卧床时间,总花费等指标中要优于椎间盘组(P0.05)。但在住院时间,出血量,切口长度及并发症等方面两组无明显的显著性差异(P0.05)。结论:两种手术方式作为脊柱微创手术,能够有效地治疗腰椎间盘突出症,安全程度较高,各有其优劣性,在临床中应根据不同的患者的实际情况进行个性化的选择。     

经皮椎板间内镜与椎板小开窗术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效比较

目的：分析和比较椎板间内镜与椎板小开窗术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效和安全性指标。方法：使用回顾性分析的方法 对2012-2014 年共计126 例在我科行椎板间内镜手术或椎板小开窗手术的腰椎间盘突出患者进行分析和比较。通过纳入和排除 标准的筛选,经皮椎板间内镜组纳入48例,椎板小开窗组纳入78 例。结合详实的术后随访,对两组患者在花费,住院时间等一般 性指标,疼痛指标,功能指标,并发症等数据进行分析和比较。结果：两组患者在术后均取得明显的治疗疗效,在疼痛、功能等指标 中都有明显的改善。但两组之间并无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。而椎板间内镜组在住院时间,出血量,切口长度及并发症等方面明 显的优于小开窗组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：经皮椎板间内镜手术作为一种脊柱微创手术,治疗效果确切,安全性好,能体 现微创的优势,可作为椎间孔镜技术在治疗椎间盘突出症的有益补充,在临床中进一步的开展和推广。     

Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry

A. Stacchini, P. Carucci, D. Pacchioni, G. Accinelli, A. Demurtas, S. Aliberti, M. Bosco, M. Bruno, A. Balbo Mussetto, M. Rizzetto, G. Bussolati and C. De Angelis
Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry Objective: Although endoscopic ultrasound combined with fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is rapidly becoming the preferred diagnostic approach for the sampling and diagnosis of gastrointestinal and mediastinal malignancies, there are limited data as to its use in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective evaluation of the performance of EUS‐guided FNA combined with flow cytometry (FC) as a tool to improve overall sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Methods: Of 1560 patients having EUS‐guided FNA during the period of the study, a total of 56 patients were evaluated by cytology with FC after EUS‐FNA. There was adequate material to perform FC analysis for all but one case. Results: EUS‐FNA‐FC gave a diagnosis of lymphoma in 11 cases and of reactive lymphadenopathy in 20. A specific histological type was defined by FC alone in eight cases. The remaining cases were diagnosed later by cytology and cell block sections: 13 carcinomas, nine granulomatous lymphadenopathies and one mediastinal extramedullary haematopoiesis. One case was considered only suspicious for lymphoma on cytology and FC but was not confirmed on molecular analysis and one had insufficient material for FC. Conclusions: Our results show that a combination of EUS‐FNA‐FC is a feasible and highly accurate method, which may be used for the diagnosis and subtyping of deep‐seated lymphoma, providing a significant improvement to cytomorphology alone both for diagnosis and treatment planning, as long as immunocytochemistry is available for non‐lymphoma cases.     

Outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery on non‐functioning pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Both microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery are effective approaches for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. The issue on the comparison of their efficacy and safety remains inconsistent. A thorough search of the literatures (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE) were performed up to March 2017. Studies reporting outcomes of microscopic or endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery on nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas were included. A meta‐analysis was performed focusing on the early stage and long term outcomes. The final search yielded 19 eligible studies enrolling 3847 patients, 389 of them underwent microscopic approach and 3458 of them with endoscopic approach. As to the early stage outcomes, the rate of gross tumor resection was significantly higher in the endoscopic group than that in microscopic group (73% versus 60%, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, endoscopic approach showed priority over microscopy on postoperative hypopituitarism (63% versus 65%, P < 0.001) and CSF leakage (3% versus 7%, P < 0.001). For the long term outcomes, the rate of visual improvement was significant higher in the endoscopic group than that in microscopic group (77% versus 50%, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the rate of permanent diabetic insipidus and meningitis. The endoscopic approach may be associated with higher rate of gross tumor movement and lower risk of postoperatively complications for treating nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma, when compared with microscopic approach. However, the confidence was shorted due to limited high quality evidence (largely randomized and controlled studies).     

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided pancreatic FNAC diagnosis for solid and cystic lesions at Manchester Royal Infirmary based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme

Objective

To compare endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐FNAC diagnosis of pancreatic lesions with patient outcome based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme diagnostic categories: Panc 1 (non‐diagnostic); Panc 2 (negative for malignancy/neoplasia); Panc 3 (atypical); Panc 4B (neoplastic, benign); Panc 4O (neoplastic, other); Panc 5 (suspicious of malignancy); and Panc 6 (positive/malignant).

Methods

All EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens taken at Manchester Royal Infirmary in 2015 were prospectively classified according to the above scheme at the time of cytology reporting and data recorded prospectively. Subsequently, outcomes based on clinical follow‐up or histopathology diagnosis were compared with the cytology diagnosis.

Results

120 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from 111 patients were received, of which 112 (93.3%) specimens had follow‐up data. There were 79 and 41 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from solid and cystic lesions, respectively. Based on the cytology diagnosis the specimens were classified as Panc 1 (7.5%), Panc 2 (33.3%), Panc 3 (2.5%), Panc 4B (2.5%), Panc 4O (15.0%), Panc 5 (3.3%) and Panc 6 (35.9%). The performance indicators for diagnosis of malignancy or neoplasia with malignant potential, included sensitivity (95.4%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive value (92.3%), false positive rate (0%) and false negative rate (4.6%).

Conclusions

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme is a logical system that can easily be introduced in a diagnostic cytopathology service. This classification scheme acts as an aid to diagnostic reporting, clear communication of significant results including risk of neoplasia/malignancy to clinicians, clinical audit and comparison of results with other centres.     

Role of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathological study of nine cases

Objective

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is an established first‐line procedure in the management of solid and cystic pancreatic masses. Lymphoma is an uncommon diagnosis in EUS‐FNA of the pancreas, and it is more common for such a diagnosis to be because of secondary involvement of the pancreas by a lymphoproliferative disorder than for this to represent isolated primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL). We present the clinical, EUS and cytological features of these lesions.

Material and methods

After obtaining approval from our Institutional Review Board (IRB), nine cases of lymphoma diagnosed on EUS‐FNA at a tertiary care cancer centre over a period of 8 years from 2008 to 2016 were retrieved from our endoscopy and pathology archives. Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) was carried out by a trained cytopathologist in all these cases. Cell blocks were available in seven cases, and immunophenotyping was performed on cell blocks using the immunoperoxidase method. Flow cytometry was performed in two cases.

Results

The most frequent site of involvement was the head of the pancreas (n=5, 55.6%). Four out of nine cases were diagnosed as PPL (44.4%). Five cases were diagnosed as lymphoma secondarily involving the pancreas (55.6%). The most frequent diagnosis was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (n=6, 66.7%), followed by Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2, 22.2%) and peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (n=1, 11.1%).

Conclusion

EUS‐FNA in experienced hands is a valuable diagnostic modality, in conjunction with ROSE, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, in the diagnosis and sub‐typing of both primary and secondary pancreatic lymphoma.