Conservation of telomere protein complexes: shuffling through evolution

The rapid evolution of telomere proteins has hindered identification of orthologs from diverse species and created the impression that certain groups of eukaryotes have largely non-overlapping sets of telomere proteins. However, the recent identification of additional telomere proteins from various model organisms has dispelled this notion by expanding our understanding of the composition, architecture and range of telomere protein complexes present in individual species. It is now apparent that versions of the budding yeast CST complex and mammalian shelterin are present in multiple phyla. While the precise subunit composition and architecture of these complexes vary between species, the general function is often conserved. Despite the overall conservation of telomere protein complexes, there is still considerable species-specific variation, with some organisms having lost a particular subunit or even an entire complex. In some cases, complex components appear to have migrated between the telomere and the telomerase RNP. Finally, gene duplication has created telomere protein paralogs with novel functions. While one paralog may be part of a conserved telomere protein complex and have the expected function, the other paralog may serve in a completely different aspect of telomere biology.     

Telomere protection and TRF2 expression are enhanced by the canonical Wnt signalling pathway

The DNA‐binding protein TRF2 is essential for telomere protection and chromosome stability in mammals. We show here that TRF2 expression is activated by the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway in human cancer and normal cells as well as in mouse intestinal tissues. Furthermore, β‐catenin binds to TRF2 gene regulatory regions that are functional in a luciferase transactivating assay. Reduced β‐catenin expression in cancer cells triggers a marked increase in telomere dysfunction, which can be reversed by TRF2 overexpression. We conclude that the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway maintains a level of TRF2 critical for telomere protection. This is expected to have an important role during development, adult stem cell function and oncogenesis.     

Cancer cell dynamics in presence of telomerase inhibitors: analysis of in vitro data

The inhibition of telomerase activity in actively dividing cells leads to suppression of cell growth after a time delay (inhibitory delay) required to reach a threshold telomeric DNA size. We developed a mathematical model of the dynamics of telomere size distribution and cell growth in the presence of telomere inhibitors that allowed quantification of the inhibitory delay. The model based on the solution of a system of differential equations described quantitatively recent experimental data on dynamics of cultured cells in presence of telomerase inhibitors. The analysis of the data by this model suggested the existence of at least two distinct subpopulations of cells with different proliferative activity. Size distribution of telomeres, fraction of proliferating cells, and tumor doubling times are of critical importance for the dynamics of cancer cells growth in presence of telomerase inhibitors. Rapidly growing cells with large telomeric DNA heterogeneity and small proliferating fractions as well as those with very short homogeneous telomeres would be the most sensitive to telomerase inhibitors.     

TRF2 promotes,remodels and protects telomeric Holliday junctions

The ability of the telomeric DNA‐binding protein, TRF2, to stimulate t‐loop formation while preventing t‐loop deletion is believed to be crucial to maintain telomere integrity in mammals. However, little is known on the molecular mechanisms behind these properties of TRF2. In this report, we show that TRF2 greatly increases the rate of Holliday junction (HJ) formation and blocks the cleavage by various types of HJ resolving activities, including the newly identified human GEN1 protein. By using potassium permanganate probing and differential scanning calorimetry, we reveal that the basic domain of TRF2 induces structural changes to the junction. We propose that TRF2 contributes to t‐loop stabilisation by stimulating HJ formation and by preventing resolvase cleavage. These findings provide novel insights into the interplay between telomere protection and homologous recombination and suggest a general model in which TRF2 maintains telomere integrity by controlling the turnover of HJ at t‐loops and at regressed replication forks.     

TRF1、TRF2和POT1基因mRNA在前列腺癌组织中的表达

目的:探究端粒重复序列结合蛋白质1(TRF1)、TRF2和端粒保护蛋白(POT1)基因mRNA在前列腺癌(PCa)组织中的表达。方法:收集46例PCa患者肿瘤中心组织(中心组织组)和35例前列腺增生(BPH)患者BPH组织(BPH组织组),提取总RNA,逆转录成cDNA,采用定量PCR测定TRF1、TRF2和POT1在中心组织组和BPH组织基因mRNA的表达,采用基因mRNA所得CT值与β-actin mRNA所得CT值之差(△CT值)表示,并进行差异性分析。结果:中心组织组TRF1的△CT值高于BPH组织组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.469,P=0.001);TRF2的△CT值分别为8.49(5.75,10.21)和8.16(6.28,9.75),差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.719,P=0.086);中心组织组POT1的△CT值高于BPH组织组,差异有统计学意义(t=-18.48,P=0.000)。结论:TRF1和POT1在PCa肿瘤组织中的表达升高,说明TRF1和POT1的高表达可能与PCa的发生和发展有关,但TRF2在PCa肿瘤中心组织和BPH组织中的表达没有表现出差异,有待进一步研究。     

The human TTAGGG repeat factors 1 and 2 bind to a subset of interstitial telomeric sequences and satellite repeats

The study of the proteins that bind to telomeric DNA in mammals has provided a deep understanding of the mechanisms involved in chromosome-end protection. However, very little is known on the binding of these proteins to nontelomeric DNA sequences. The TTAGGG DNA repeat proteins 1 and 2 (TRF1 and TRF2) bind to mammalian telomeres as part of the shelterin complex and are essential for maintaining chromosome end stability. In this study, we combined chromatin immunoprecipitation with high-throughput sequencing to map at high sensitivity and resolution the human chromosomal sites to which TRF1 and TRF2 bind. While most of the identified sequences correspond to telomeric regions, we showed that these two proteins also bind to extratelomeric sites. The vast majority of these extratelomeric sites contains interstitial telomeric sequences (or ITSs). However, we also identified non-ITS sites, which correspond to centromeric and pericentromeric satellite DNA. Interestingly, the TRF-binding sites are often located in the proximity of genes or within introns. We propose that TRF1 and TRF2 couple the functional state of telomeres to the long-range organization of chromosomes and gene regulation networks by binding to extratelomeric sequences.