U-series and ESR analyses of bones and teeth relating to the human burials from Skhul

In order to resolve long-standing issues surrounding the age of the Skhul early modern humans, new analyses have been conducted, including the dating of four well-provenanced fossils by ESR and U-series. If the Skhul burials took place within a relatively short time span, then the best age estimate lies between 100 and 135 ka. This result agrees very well with TL ages obtained from burnt flint of 119+/-18 ka (Mercier et al., 1993). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the material associated with the Skhul IX burial is older than those of Skhul II and Skhul V. These and other recent age estimates suggest that the three burial sites, Skhul, Qafzeh and Tabun are broadly contemporaneous, falling within the time range of 100 to 130 ka. The presence of early representatives of both early modern humans and Neanderthals in the Levant during Marine Isotope Stage 5 inevitably complicates attempts at segregating these populations by date or archaeological association. Nevertheless, it does appear that the oldest known symbolic burials are those of early modern humans at Skhul and Qafzeh. This supports the view that, despite the associated Middle Palaeolithic technology, elements of modern human behaviour were represented at Skhul and Qafzeh prior to 100 ka.     

Model for the examination of evolutionary trends in tooth development

Through the use of serial computerized tomography (C-t) scans, two distinct developmental stages can be identified in mature teeth. C-t scans thus provide a non-destructive method for assessing growth within individual teeth, as well as for comparison of the development of modern and fossil teeth. The second deciduous molar (DM2) and first permanent molar (M1) resemble one another morphologically, despite differences in size and developmental rates. Thus, they provide an excellent model for studying variation in growth within an individual. To test the C-t method, we first examined a recent archaeological sample and then examined teeth from Skhul I. Serial C-t scans were used to compare two distinct developmental stages represented by the dentine-enamel junction (DEJ) and outer enamel surface (OES), respectively, in mandibular DM2 and M1 of 31 archaeological specimens. The difference in form and size between these two surfaces in and between teeth was calculated from intercusp distances measured at the DEJ and OES using the form distance matrix. Intercusp distances at the DEJ and OES of these teeth were then compared to their counterparts in the DM2 and M1 of Skhul I, taken here as representative of early anatomically modern Homo sapiens sapiens. Form differences between paired DM2 and M1 at the DEJ were smaller than those at the OES, supporting the hypothesis that differences between the two teeth increase throughout development. The increase in intercusp distances from the DEJ to OES was found to reflect the angulation of cusps relative to one another, rather than enamel thickness. Form differences between the Skhul DM2 and M1 were smaller than those observed in the recent series, and the recent M1 differed more than the DM2 from its fossil counterpart. The similarities found between the Skhul permanent and deciduous teeth and the recent DM2, may reflect a similar growth pattern. This would contribute to earlier crown completion in the fossil M1. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 102:283–294, 1997 © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Metrical reconsideration of the Skhul IV and IX and Border Cave 1 crania in the context of modern human origins.

The "out-of-Africa" models for origins of modern Homo sapiens incorporate Skhul as one site documenting that early origination. However, only Skhul V is usually considered in the comparative craniology of the question, neglecting the other substantial crania, Skhul IV and IX. Craniometric comparison demonstrates that IV and IX amplify the picture of continuous gradations of Neandertal-to-modern variations throughout the Levant; much variation is thus represented within this one site, raising serious questions about Neandertals and moderns being discrete and long-separated species. Qafzeh 6 too is craniophenetically closer to Neandertals than to the true anatomically modern people of the European Upper Paleolithic. Proper distance analysis of Border Cave 1 cranium shows it is actually far removed from modern African populations. References to Qafzeh, Skhul, and Border Cave as "fully anatomically modern" require reconsideration.