Die Ölblumensymbiosen – Parallelismus and andere Aspekte ihrer Entwicklung in Raum and Zeit1, 2

The oil-bee/oil-flower relationships: parallelism and other aspects of their evolution in space and time A survey is given of our present knowledge and existing hypotheses concerning the biogeography, history, and phylogeny of plant taxa yielding fatty oil as a floral reward, and of the bee genera involved in their pollination. Four syngenetic complexes of the symbiosis arose convergently: The neotropical, the paleotropical, the holarctic, and the capensic complex. On the basis of the mutual structural adaptations of bees and flowers it is concluded that, in addition, parallelism within related groups as a result of a common tendency to develop the respective organs, has played an important role in the evolution of the oil-based floral interrelationships.     

Betrachtungen an Schädeln von Goldfischen (Carassius gibelio f. auratus)

Studies on skulls of goldfishes (Carassius gibelio f. auratus) The aim of the study is to analse skulls of some races of goldfish, the domesticated form of Carassius gibelio Bloch, 1782. The problem: are changes of these skulls parallelisms to skulls of other domesticated animals originating from different species. Parallelism is a most interesting phenomenon of phylogeny abundant but not regular, very frequent in domesticated animals. Skulls of normal goldfish, of frinetail and tigerhead have been compared. In total the skulls of fringetail and especially tigerhead are broader, higher, stouter, the faceart shortened. Remarkable in detail: the opercula are slender and higher in fringetail and tigerhead than in normal goldfish, the preopercula shortened and their ventral art bended upwards, influencin the position of the mouth. In comparison with normal goldfish the skulls of fringetail and tigerhead have to be classified als parallelisms to skulls of some races of other domesticated secies. Finally: some remarks on parallelism, convergence and pluripotenz and agout modern viewpoints on the relations between genes and complex organismal patterns.     

Tale of tails: parallelism and prehensility

The occurrence of prehensile tails among only five platyrrhine genera--Cebus, Alouatta, Lagothrix, Ateles, and Brachyteles--might be interpreted as evidence that these are a closely related, possibly monophyletic group. In the absence of behavioral data, it is impossible to test whether all possess equivalent biological roles; such would lend credence to the idea that their tails evolved from an homologous, derived character complex. Contrariwise, the tendency for species of Cebus to have "averagely" proportioned or relatively short tails, in contrast to the relatively elongate tails of howlers and other atelines; osteological differences in caudal and sacral morphology; and a lack of ateline-like tail/neocortex correlates in Cebus, all imply that prehensility has evolved twice in parallel: once (homologously) in atelines and again in capuchins.     

Radiation, multiple dispersal and parallelism in the skinks, Chalcides and Sphenops (Squamata: Scincidae), with comments on Scincus and Scincopus and the age of the Sahara Desert

Phylogenetic analysis using up to 1325 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA from 179 specimens and 30 species of Chalcides, Sphenops, Eumeces, Scincopus and Scincus indicates that Sphenops arose twice independently within Chalcides. It is consequently synonymized with that genus. Chalcides in this broader sense originated in Morocco, diversifying into four main clades about 10 Ma, after which some of its lineages dispersed widely to cover an area 40 times as large. Two separate lineages invaded the Canary Islands and at least five main lineages colonized southern Europe. At least five more spread across northern Africa, one extending into southwest Asia. Elongate bodies with reduced limbs have evolved at least four times in Chalcides, mesic 'grass-swimmers' being produced in one case and extensive adaptation to life in loose desert sand in two others. In clade, Chalcides striatus colonized SW Europe from NW Africa 2.6 Ma and C. chalcides mainland Italy 1.4 Ma, both invasions being across water, while C. c. vittatus reached Sardinia more recently, perhaps anthropogenically, and C. guentheri spread 1200km further east to Israel. C. minutus is a composite, with individuals from the type locality forming a long independent lineage and the remaining ones investigated being most closely related to C. mertensi. In the Northern clade, C. boulengeri and C. sepsoides spread east through sandy habitats north of the Sahara about 5 Ma, the latter reaching Egypt. C. bedriagai invaded Spain around the same time, perhaps during the Messinian period when the Mediterranean was dry, and shows considerable diversification. Although it is currently recognized as one species, the C. ocellatus clade exhibits as much phylogenetic depth as the other main clades of Chalcides, having at least six main lineages. These have independently invaded Malta and Sardinia from Tunisia and also southwest Arabia C. o. humilis appears to have spread over 4000 km through the Sahel, south of the Sahara quite recently, perhaps in the Pleistocene. In the Western clade of Chalcides, C. delislei appears to have dispersed in a similar way. There were also two invasions of the Canary Islands: one around 5 Ma by C. simonyi, and the other about 7 Ma by the ancestor of C. viridanus+C. sexlineatus. C. montanus was believed to be related to C. lanzai of the Northern clade, but in the mtDNA tree it is placed within C. polylepis of the Western clade, although this may possibly be an artifact of introgression. The Eumeces schneideri group, Scincopus and Scincus form a clade separate from Chalcides. Within this clade, the geographically disjunct E. schneideri group is paraphyletic. One of its members, E. algeriensis is the sister taxon to Scincopus, and Scincus may also be related to these taxa. The phylogeny suggests Scincopus entered desert conditions in Africa, up to 9.6 Ma and the same may have been true of Scincus up to 11.7 Ma. Scincus appears to have diversified and spread into Arabia around 6 Ma. Dates of origin and divergence of these skinks, desert Chalcides and other squamates agree with recent geological evidence that the Sahara is at least 5-7 My old. The subspecies Chalcides viridanus coeruleopunctatus is upgraded to the species level as C. coeruleopunctatus stat nov., on the basis of its large genetic divergence from C. v. viridanus.     

Feathers with Ocular Architecture: Implications for Functional and Evolutionary Similarities of Visual Signals and Receptors

Studies of visual receptors typically assume that only functionally similar structures are relevant to the evolution of complex eyes. This approach ignores growing evidence that different functional classes of organs often share structural and developmental patterns that pertain to biological sameness (deep homology). However, the potential relevance of non-receptor structures to eye evolution remains largely unexplored. An “ocular” feather color mechanism is described whose structural and optical features resemble those of chambered, image-forming eyes to a remarkable degree. These similarities include a laterally expanded, domed light receiving surface similar to that of an eye, an encapsulated spongy tissue mass whose coherent light scattering properties in the human-visible (destructive) and ultraviolet (constructive) wavelength ranges resemble those of cornea and lens, intervening spaces such as those with humors, and a laminar pigmented shelf whose structure and optics resemble a mirrored tapetum lucidum found behind many retinas. Fourier analysis and optical principles indicate that ocular structures adhere to the same light-handling properties regardless of higher function (receptor or signal). The extent to which chambered eyes and ocular feathers have evolved independently is surprisingly equivocal. On the one hand, broad differences in the location, composition, and development of chambered eyes and ocular feather signals suggest convergent evolution on an ocular organization. However, some level of evolutionary parallelism (generative homology) between chambered eyes and ocular feathers is implicated by similarities in constructional materials, tissue development, and signal transduction cascades. Structural, optical, and developmental similarities also occur between more primitive eyes and the colored dermal papillae responsible for avian skin ornamentation. Functional constraints on light-handling requirements, coupled with developmental constraints in high-stress environments on the body surface, may enhance the similar evolutionary outcomes in the different functional setting. Regardless of the mechanistic details, repeated evolution of eye-like structures in different functional settings reveals a biological potential to produce such organs that is much greater than would be inferred from a survey of receptor structures alone.     

Is convergence more than an analogy? Homoplasy and its implications for macroevolutionary predictability

A number of authors have pointed to “convergent evolution” as evidence for the central role of natural selection in shaping predictable trajectories of macroevolution. However, there are numerous conceptual and empirical difficulties that arise in broadly appealing to the frequency of homoplasy as evidence for a non-contingently constrained adaptational design space. Most important is the need to distinguish between convergent (externally constrained) and parallel (internally constrained) evolution, and to consider how the respective frequencies of these significantly different sources of homoplasy affect a strong adaptationist view of life. In this paper, I critically evaluate Simon Conway Morris’s use of the homoplasy literature to support his argument for a non-contingent, counterfactually stable account of macroevolutionary pattern. In so doing, I offer a conception of parallelism which avoids the charge that it differs from convergence merely in degree and not in kind. I argue that although organisms sharing a homoplastic trait will also share varying degrees of homology, it is the underlying developmental homology with respect to the generators directly causally responsible for the homoplastic event that defines parallel evolution and non-arbitrarily distinguishes it from convergence. The notion of “screening-off” is used to distinguish the proximal generators of a homoplastic trait from its more distal genetic causes (such as a master control gene).

Homoplasy and homology: dichotomy or continuum?

Homology is the presence of the same feature in two organisms whose most recent common ancestor also possessed the feature. I discuss the bases on which we can tell that two features being compared share sufficient elements of sameness to allow them to be treated as homologous and therefore to be legitimately compared with one another in a way that informs comparative, evolutionary, and phylogenetic analysis. To do so, I discuss the relationship(s) between homology and homoplasy to conclude that we are dealing neither with a dichotomy between homoplasy as parallelism/convergence and homology as common descent nor with a dichotomy of homoplasy as the interrupted presence of the character in a lineage and homology as the continuous presence of the character. Rather, we are dealing with common descent with varying degrees of modification. Homoplasy and homology are not dichotomies but the extremes of a continuum, reflecting deep or more recent shared ancestry based on shared cellular mechanisms and processes and shared genes and gene pathways and networks. The same genes can be used to initiate the development of homoplastic and homologous structures. Consequently, structures may be lost but their developmental bases retained, providing the potential for homoplasy. It should not be surprising that similar features persist when a feature is present in the nearest common ancestor (homology). Neither should it be surprising to find that different environments or selective pressures can trigger the reappearance of similar features in organisms that do not share a recent common ancestor (homoplasy).     

Diskontinuierlich aktive Gene und Evolution Eine Diskussion am Beispiel der Archaeognatha (Insecta)

Discontinuous activity of genes and evolution - a discussion based on examples of the Archaeognatha (Insecta) On the basis of examples, mainly from the group of Archaeognatha (Insecta) it seems probable that, in multicellular organisms, there is not only a discontinuous activity of genes and groups of genes during the individual development, but also during the phylogenesis. The possibility that silent genes can be reactivated is probably an essential reason for the existence of parallelisms and homologous tendencies. Both conceptions have a complementary importance for an establishment of taxa ana the reconstruction of phylogenesis and are defined according to evolutionary genetics. The examples are discussed and the necessity of similar comparative studies in other supraspecific taxa is emphasized.     

Morphology and function of the shoulder joint of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)1

The shoulder joint of the Microchiroptera shows a remarkable morphological variation that has been studied in 20 individual bats from 15 species and 11 families. The basic morphology of the shoulder joint, with a globular humeral head and a corresponding glenoid cavity, is found in the Megachiroptera and, within the Microchiroptera, in the Rhinopomatidae. Besides this basic shoulder joint, there are two derived joint types: the derived and specialized shoulder joint with a single articular surface on the scapula and a more-or-less oblong humeral head, and the derived and specialized shoulder joint with secondary articular surfaces on the trochiter and on the dorsal aspect of the scapula. The first type of derived joint is most strikingly developed in the Mormoopidae and the Noctilionidae, the second one in the Vespertilionidae and the Molossidae. It is suggested that both types of derived shoulder joints have the functional significance of reducing the pronatory movements of the abducted forearm during the downstroke of the wing-beat cycle. This suggested function of the secondary shoulder joint is a new approach to understanding this very peculiar structure. In species with these specialized shoulder joints, the downstroke musculature is comparatively better developed and the M. serratus ant. post. div. comparatively less well developed. A hypothesis is offered to explain and combine the osteological and myological findings. Each of the derived types of shoulder joints has developed independently more than once through parallel evolution.