Mutagenic activity of selected aromatic amines and polycyclic hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster

With the use of a series of wild-type and repair-deficient strains and appropriate application procedures, it is possible to demonstrate that carcinogenic aromatic amines and polycyclic hydrocarbons are mutagens in Drosophila. We have shown evidence that AAF, N-OH-AAF, AcO-AAF, BP, DAS and DMBA produce recessive lethals when fed to or injected into adult males. Mutagenic activity was also observed when male larvae were exposed to AAF, BP, DMBA, 3-MC or NA. DA was not mutagenic in the recessive lethal assay under the conditions of the test. DMBA can now be considered as a potent mutagen for Drosophila, although demonstration of its activity depends upon the choice of the treatment procedure and the strain selected. One of the questions concerning the action of aromatic amines and polycyclic hydrocarbons is how their genetic effectiveness in Drosophila can be enhanced. The observation that none of several enzyme inducers (PB, BF, AC, 3-MC) increased their mutagenicity may be interpreted in terms of a more efficient metabolic activation or deactivation. This assumes that active metabolite(s) did not reach the testis in doses sufficient for mutation induction. It also appears that, since the problems pertaining to mutagenicity in Drosophila of aromatic hydrocarbons are obviously a matter of metabolism, the use of repair-deficient strains is no longer an attractive proposal for their elucidation. The present investigation shows that, with weak mutagens, usage of strains mei-9Li or y mei-9a mei-4lD5 does not improve the sensitivity of the recessive lethal method or the test for chromosomal loss. As an alternative, in our opinion more attention should be devoted to possible differences in metabolism between somatic and gonadal tissue. We feel strongly that somatic assay systems might be particularly valuable as a complement to recessive lethal tests on the germ line.