Oichnus Bromley Borings in the Irregular Echinoid Hemipneustes Agassiz from the Type Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous,The Netherlands and Belgium)

Three ichnospecies of Oichnus Bromley occur in tests of the large holasteroid echinoid Hemipneustes striatoradiatus (Leske) in the type area of the Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) in The Netherlands and Belgium; Oichnus simplex Bromley (penetrative), Oichnus paraboloides Bromley (nonpenetrative and showing two distinct morphologies), and Oichnus excavatus isp. nov. (nonpenetrative). The two distinct morphologies of O. paraboloides (both shallow, one with a central boss) are gregarious, but do not occur together on the same specimens, suggesting they were generated by different taxa. Oichnus paraboloides with a central boss occurs on H. striatoradiatus from the upper Nekum Member, Maastricht Formation (Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous). Tests of the host echinoid are smaller in the overlying Meerssen Member, Maastricht Formation, where they are infested by O. excavatus, the largest borings considered herein, which have concave walls and a large central boss. Blisters inside tests from the Meerssen Member show that this infestation occurred when the echinoid was alive. It is postulated that producers of these borings in H. striatoradiatus may have been genetically related and increased in size during the Maastrichtian even as the host echinoids showed a size decrease. This size increase in H. striatoradiatus was genetic and cannot be related to increase in size of borings.     

Extremes of Pit Infestation and Growth Deformity in a Crinoid Column,Permian of Timor

Crinoids are diverse and well-known from the Permian of Timor, but the literature has failed to document the numerous specimens of crinoid pluricolumnals from the fauna, many showing unusual morphology or yielding palaeoecological information. A curious and instructive specimen demonstrates the relationship between a living Permian crinoid and coeval invasive, pit-forming, invertebrates in detail. The pit-former is not preserved; most likely it was unmineralized or, if mineralized, then the shell simply dropped out. The infesting organism made pits assigned to the ichnospecies Oichnus paraboloides Bromley. The pit-former was unusually site selective. Either (1) one spatfall attached to just one side of the elevated (either up-current or down-current) or recumbent column and each individual centered their pits on the sutures between adjacent columnals; or (2) a single individual migrated along the column. The living crinoid showed an extreme reaction to this infestation. Excess stereom growth on the side of the pits transformed what was a circular column by addition of a thick, triangular ridge on the pitted side.     

Can Naticid Gastropod Predators Be Identified by the Holes They Drill?

We tested the hypothesis that drillholes made by different species of predatory naticid gastropods can be differentiated by variability in the inner (IBD) and outer borehole diameters (OBD) of the holes they drill. We compared two samples of Mya arenaria that were drilled by different predators, Euspira heros and Neverita duplicata, under experimental conditions. Mean IBD:OBD ratio was significantly greater for holes drilled by Euspira compared to Neverita, indicating that Euspira drills a steeper drillhole than Neverita. We also found consistent differences between the two naticids for slopes of regression lines of IBD on OBD after standardization for predator size and prey size and thickness, with slopes for Euspira being steeper, but results were not statistically significant. However, the range of IBD:OBD ratios was wide and overlapped considerably for each species, which decreases confidence in assignment of individual drillholes to a particular predator species. At least in the case of these two naticid species, interspecific differences in variation of the inner and outer diameters of the holes they drill have limited utility in identifying the maker of individual boring traces in the fossil record.     

Shallow Traces (Pits) in the Test of the Irregular Echinoid Echinocorys scutata Leske from the Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) of the United Kingdom

Specimens of epifaunal irregular echinoids in the Upper Cretaceous of northern Europe have been reported with patterns of circular, nonpenetrative parabolic pits, Oichnus paraboloides (Bromley), in the apical region. Specimens of Echinocorys scutata Leske from the Chalk at two sites in southeast England were commonly penetrated by this trace, generated by an indeterminate pit-forming organism. Pits commonly surround the apical system and, less commonly, occur within it; they occur preferentially anteriorly. Pits occur within plates, not along margins or sutures. Crosscutting of pits indicates that multiple spatfalls probably occurred. The host echinoid added new test plates adjacent to the apical system; thus, plates bearing O. paraboloides were moved abapically. The reduction in number of pits away from the apex, including those with echinoid tubercles reestablished on the base, indicates that, following death of an infester, the echinoid “reclaimed” and infilled them with calcite. The pit-former was most probably an unmineralized invertebrate that used E. scutata as a domicile which provided good access to food-rich currents for suspension feeding. Although the systematic position of the pit-former is unknown, similar infestations are known from other Upper Cretaceous echinoids and Mississippian crinoids.     

A Dense Infestation of Round Pits in the Irregular Echinoid Hemipneustes striatoradiatus (Leske) from the Maastrichtian of the Netherlands

A test of the holasteroid echinoid Hemipneustes striatoradiatus (Leske) from the upper Meerssen Member (subunit IVf-6; Maastricht Formation) in the type area of the Maastrichtian Stage (Late Cretaceous) was infested by 170 non-penetrative pits assigned to Oichnus excavatus (Donovan and Jagt). The echinoid is assumed to have been alive at that time. The distribution of pits is approximately bilaterally symmetrical and mainly supraambital; pits on the oral surface may have been carried subambitally by echinoid plate growth. Many pits are comparatively shallow; they probably were partly filled by the echinoid after death of the pit-forming organisms. The area around the periproct is devoid of pits as is the anterior ambulacrum (amb III). The latter was probably kept free of larval pit-formers by the tube feet; other ambulacra, with tube feet adapted for respiration, lacked such defense.