交感皮肤反应在糖尿病周围神经病变诊断中的应用

糖尿病周围神经病变（Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy,DPN）是糖尿病最常见的并发症之一。由于目前DPN发病机制不清楚、治疗效果不理想,故早诊断、早治疗显得至关重要。有研究指出交感神经皮肤反应（Sympathetic Skin Response,SSR）可作为评价2型糖尿病患者早期周围植物神经功能状态的指标。本文对SSR应用于DPN临床诊断中的检测技术、观测参数进行综述,发现多数研究中指出,在临床应用中SSR波形、波幅以及潜伏期指标的异常率常受到多种因素的影响、会发生很大波动,而电位曲线下面积减少值相对稳定。据此笔者建议在DPN早期临床诊断中以SSR电位曲线下面积减少作为关键参数,辅助参考SSR波形、波幅以及潜伏期指标进行诊断。     

The association between glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta polymorphisms and Parkinson's disease susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Previous studies on the association between glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3-β) polymorphisms (rs334558 and rs6438552) and Parkinson's disease (PD) susceptibility remained inconsistent. Thus, the goal of this study was to re-examine their exact association by a meta-analysis. All eligible studies were identified by a systematic literature search of multiple databases. Six studies (3105 cases and 4387 controls) on rs334558 and six studies (2579 cases and 4091 controls) on rs6438552 were included. The quality of these studies was generally good according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis showed null association between the two variants and PD susceptibility in all genetic models from the overall or Caucasian population. However, the analysis of rs334558 revealed that the risk of PD decreased in heterozygote, dominant or additive models (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.74; OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.78; OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.94, respectively) from the Eastern Asian population. Moreover, the analysis on the homozygote, heterozygote, dominant or additive models suggested that rs6438552 also reduced the PD risk (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.84; OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.97; OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.87; OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.88, respectively) in the Eastern Asian population. Together, the findings suggest that the two variants both reduced the risk of PD in the Eastern Asian subgroup but not in the overall and Caucasian populations, which should be cautiously interpreted because of limited number of included studies.     

The value of biodiversity experiments

Recent biodiversity experiments have investigated the relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning by synthesizing plant communities from pools of species that have been experimentally manipulated to vary numbers and types of species present while holding abiotic factors constant. Biodiversity experiments therefore focus on a previously under-explored aspect of global change: the feedback from diversity to environment. Consequences of random manipulation of species communities may not correspond well to those of specific extinction sequences observed in the past in response to extinction drivers that cause highly non-random loss. However, random manipulation provides a good starting point given that existing communities could undergo many alternative orders of species loss in the future in response to a variety of different potential extinction drivers. Further, the effects of some extinction drivers are currently poorly understood and therefore difficult to predict (e.g. climate change) and it may be premature to dismiss the predictions of random scenarios as irrelevant to all real examples of species loss. The first generations of biodiversity experiments have provided valuable, and sometimes unexpected, discoveries about the general nature of the relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning. These discoveries could not have been made using observational studies. We propose that different examples of extinction loss in the real or a potential future world form a continuum from situations where the results of the first-generation biodiversity experiments will be highly relevant to less relevant. At the one extreme are examples where the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning will be overwhelmed by direct effects of the extinction driver on processes (e.g. chronic eutrophication). At the other extreme are situations where ecosystem processes are not strongly affected by direct effects of the extinction driver and where the effects of species loss on functioning may be more important (e.g. habitat fragmentation). Given the unprecedented uncertainty about the future of biodiversity and the functioning of ecosystems, a general approach with randomly varying species pools was the right place to start in order to provide a general foundation. The new challenge is to test for effects of biodiversity on functioning in real-world examples of species loss.

Zusammenfassung

Biodiversitätsversuche zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass natürliche Artenpools experimentell reduziert werden und anschließend der Zusammenhang zwischen der Artenzahl und Ökosystemfunktionen unter konstanten abiotischen Umweltbedingungen untersucht wird. Dadurch unterscheiden sich Biodiversitätsexperimente grundsätzlich von anderen Versuchen, die die Biodiversität als Zielvariable behandeln und stattdessen die abiotische Umwelt manipulieren. Die Auswahl der Arten für die reduzierten Artenpools in Biodiversitätsexperimenten erfolgte bisher meist zufällig, während natürliche Aussterbefaktoren wie Eutrophierung nicht alle Arten gleichermassen gefährden. Für verschiedene Aussterbefaktoren ist aber so wenig bekannt, dass ein zufälliges Aussterbeszenario die beste gegenwärtig verfügbare Option ist. Dies trifft insbesondere für mögliche zukünftige Aussterbeprozesse zu, die durch globale Umweltveränderungen (Klima, biologische Invasionen) oder Habitatsfragmentierung ausgelöst werden könnten. Die erste Generation von Biodiversitätsexperimenten mit zufälligen Aussterbeszenarien hat wertvolle, teilweise unerwartete, generelle Zusammenhänge zwischen Artenzahl und Ökosystemfunktionen aufgedeckt. Diese Zusammenhänge ließen sich durch vergleichende Studien nicht erkennen. In Zukunft sollten Biodiversitätsexperimente dennoch vermehrt Aussterbeszenarien simulieren, die in der realen Umwelt mit größter Wahrscheinlichkeit auftreten.     

Learning to fear and cope with a natural stressor: individually and socially acquired corticosterone and avoidance responses to biting flies

Animals learn to recognize and respond to a variety of dangerous factors, with biting and blood-feeding flies being among the most prevalent of natural stressors. Here we describe the behavioral avoidance and hormonal (corticosterone) stress responses to biting fly exposure and the roles of individual and social learning in the acquisition of these fear-associated responses. Male mice exposed to a single 30-min session of attack by intact biting flies (stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans L.) exhibited increased plasma corticosterone levels and active self-burying responses to avoid the flies. When exposed 24 h later to altered flies whose biting mouth parts were removed and were incapable of biting, the mice displayed conditioned increases in corticosterone and avoidance responses. This conditioned increase in corticosterone and self-burying was also acquired through social learning without direct individual experience with the intact biting flies. Fly naive "observer" mice that witnessed other "demonstrator" mice being attacked by biting flies, but were not exposed to intact flies themselves, displayed increases in corticosterone levels and self-burying to avoid flies when exposed 24 h later to altered flies. The social learning was not due to social facilitation or sensitization. Observers had to witness the self-burying avoidance responses of the demonstrator to the biting flies in order to subsequently recognize a potential threat to themselves and display the appropriate responses. These individually and socially acquired conditioned fear responses are likely part of the mechanisms that allow animals to defend themselves from biting and blood-feeding arthropods.     

Observational visuospatial encoding of the cache locations of others by western scrub-jays (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Aphelocoma californica</Emphasis>)

Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) hide food and rely on spatial memory to recover their caches at a later date. They also rely on observational spatial memory to steal caches made by other individuals. Successful pilfering may require an understanding of allocentric space because the observer will often be in a different position from the demonstrator when the caching event occurs. We compared cache recovery accuracy of pairs of observers that watched a demonstrator cache food. The pattern of recovery searches showed that observers were more accurate when they had observed the caching event from the same viewing direction as the demonstrator than when they had watched from the opposite direction. Search accuracy was not affected by whether or not the tray-specific local cues provided left–right landmark information (i.e. heterogeneous vs. homogeneous local cues), or whether or not the caching tray location was rotated. Taken together, these results suggest that observers have excellent spatial memory and that they have little difficulty with mental rotation.     

Modeling the impact of periodic bottlenecks, unidirectional mutation, and observational error in experimental evolution

Antibiotic resistant bacteria are a constant threat in the battle against infectious diseases. One strategy for reducing their effect is to temporarily discontinue the use of certain antibiotics in the hope that in the absence of the antibiotic the resistant strains will be replaced by the sensitive strains. An experiment where this strategy is employed in vitro [5] produces data which showed a slow accumulation of sensitive mutants. Here we propose a mathematical model and statistical analysis to explain this data.The stochastic model elucidates the trend and error structure of the data. It provides a guide for developing future sampling strategies, and provides a framework for long term predictions of the effects of discontinuing specific antibiotics on the dynamics of resistant bacterial populations.This Research is part of the Initiative in Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies (IBEST) at the University of Idaho. Funding was provided by NSF EPSCoR EPS-0080935, NSF EPSCoR, EPS-0132626, and NIH NCRR grant NIH NCRR- 20RR016448. Paul Joyce is also funded by NSF DEB-0089756, and NSF DMS-0072198.     

The case-only odds ratio as a causal parameter

In the simplest case-only design, cases of a disease are cross-classified into a 2 x 2 table describing a genotype attribute and exposure to some environmental agent. In some instances, the genetic attribute has described inherited genes; in other instances, it has described mutations, for instance, damage to proto-oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes leading to cancer. Here, the population case-only odds ratio is written as a causal parameter in terms of potential outcomes with and without exposure to the agent. It is shown that the case-only odds ratio makes sense as a causal parameter with inherited genes, but its magnitude does not have a causal interpretation with mutations, although deviations from 1 do provide information. The difference is that the environmental agent certainly did not cause an individual to inherit particular genes, but it may have caused the mutation.