High-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by surgery in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A multi-institutional retrospective study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society)

BackgroundThe optimal induction treatment in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains undefined.AimTo compare neoadjuvant high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with resectable, stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsRetrospective, multicentre study of 99 patients diagnosed with stage cT1-T3N2M0 NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (high-dose CRT or CHT) followed by surgery between January 2005 and December 2014.Results47 patients (47.5%) underwent CRT and 52 (52.5%) CHT, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Surgery consisted of lobectomy (87.2% and 82.7%, in the CRT and CHT groups, respectively) or pneumonectomy (12.8% vs. 17.3%). Nodal downstaging (to N1/N0) and Pathologic complete response (pCR; pT0pN0) rates were significantly higher in the CRT group (89.4% vs. 57.7% and 46.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p < 0.001)). Locoregional recurrence was significantly lower in the CRT group (8.5% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.047) but distant recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Median PFS was 45 months (CHT) vs. “not reached” (CRT). Median OS was similar: 61 vs. 56 months (p = 0.803). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicity were observed. On the Cox regression analysis, advanced pT stage was associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001) and persistent N2 disease (p = 0.002) was associated with worse PFS.ConclusionsCompared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, a higher proportion of patients treated with preoperative CRT achieved nodal downstaging and pCR with better locoregional control. However, there were no differences in survival. More studies are needed to know the optimal treatment of these patients.     

新辅助化疗后腋窝病理完全缓解乳腺癌的预后分析

摘要 目的：研究乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗（NAC）后达到腋窝淋巴结病理完全缓解（pathologic complete response of axillary,apCR）的远期生存以及影响远期生存的相关因素分析。方法：回顾性分析哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科624例乳腺癌患者的住院资料,采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析以及COX回归分析的统计学分析方法,分析乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后腋窝状态与无病生存（DFS）和总生存（OS）的关系及影响apCR预后的因素。结果：apCR与非apCR患者比较DFS（P=0.013）和OS（P=0.037）差异具有统计学意义,apCR患者的预后与年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤受体状态、HER-2、ki67状态、分子分型等因素无相关性。结论：与非apCR患者相比,乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后apCR患者预后更好,但apCR患者预后良好的因素仍需进一步临床试验分析。     

局部进展期胃癌术前动静脉结合化疗的疗效观察

目的:局部进展期胃癌,即使没有出现远处转移或腹膜种植,预后也极不理想.我们对局部进展期胃癌患者进行术前mECF方案的动静脉结合化疗,以评价其治疗疗效.方法:选取自2009年1月至2011年6月间我院局部进展期胃癌Ⅱ-ⅢC期患者38例,均由影像学确定淋巴结高度可疑转移或浸润、包绕主要血管结构,且没有发现远处转移或腹膜种植,进行2个周期的术前动静脉结合化疗后,行手术治疗.记录化疗毒性反应、临床、病理缓解率、手术并发症发生率和病死率以及1年无病生存率.结果:化疗毒性反应低,3级反应不超过10％,仅有1例出现4级反应,表现为腹泻、恶心和呕吐.38例患者中临床CR有6例,占15.8％,PR17例,占44.7％,NC13例(34.2％),PD2例(5.3％),RR为60.5％(23/38).全部患者均施行了手术,37例患者进行了根治性手术,R0切除率为97％.病理缓解率为5例完全缓解(13.2％),21例部分缓解(55.3％),8例轻微缓解(21.1％),4例未缓解(10.5％).手术并发症发生率为7.9％,无治疗相关死亡发生.1年无病生存率为81.6％.结论:局部进展期胃癌患者术前进行mECF方案的动静脉化疗毒性反应低,疗效理想,之后行手术完整切除后临床效果突出,是理想的治疗方法.     

宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗前后miR-138的表达及与化疗敏感性的关系研究

目的:研究宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗前后微小RNA-138(mi R-138)的表达及与化疗敏感性的关系。方法:选取2016年2月至2018年7月我院收治的宫颈癌患者18例为研究对象。所有患者均给予新辅助化疗,并根据治疗后的效果分为化疗有效组与化疗无效组。采用微阵列芯片技术分别检测两组患者化疗前后的mi R-138表达水平,同时采用Western blot技术检测mi R-138基因靶蛋白γH2AX的表达情况,分析患者化疗后mi R-138表达水平与临床病理特征的关系。结果:化疗有效组化疗后mi R-138△Ct值明显低于化疗前,且明显低于化疗无效组(P0.05),而化疗无效组化疗后mi R-138△Ct值与化疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。化疗后两组靶蛋白γH2AX相对表达量均明显低于化疗前(P0.05),化疗有效组靶蛋白γH2AX相对表达量的差值显著低于化疗无效组(P0.05)。宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗后组织中mi R-138△Ct差值与肿瘤分化程度、浸润深度和淋巴结转移密切相关(P0.05),与年龄、FIGO临床分期无关(P0.05)。结论:新辅助化疗可以改变宫颈癌患者的mi R-138表达水平,且mi R-138的表达水平可能与化疗药物敏感性密切相关。     

Neoadjuvant tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors: comparisons and clinical outcomes

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive large operable or locally advanced breast cancer is effective and a safe alternative to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women. A randomised trial has demonstrated that the response rate and the incidence and degree of downstaging with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole is significantly greater than with tamoxifen [J. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2001) 3808]. Tumours at all levels of ER appear to respond better to letrozole than tamoxifen but at low levels of ER responses are seen only with letrozole and not with tamoxifen. Patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy and those who achieve the greatest reduction in tumour volume are those patients with tumours that express very high levels of ER (ALLRED category score 8). Both letrozole and anastrozole appear effective in both erbB2 positive and negative breast cancers. Three months of treatment is adequate to determine if a tumour will respond. Following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy, local recurrence rates appear satisfactory.     

彩色多普勒超声对乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的评价研究

目的:探讨彩色多普勒超声(CDFI)对乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NCT)疗效评价的临床应用价值。方法:选取2013年1月~2013年12月在我院接受新辅助化疗后行手术治疗的女性乳腺癌患者55例,以病理学评价为金标准,化疗后根据化疗效果分为有效组和无效组,利用CDFI观察患者NCT前后病灶超声指标、病灶内血流分级及阻力指数(RI)值变化。结果:55例患者中,临床触诊疗效评价符合率为36.4%,敏感度为60.7%;CDFI评价符合率为70.9%,敏感度为85.7%。CDFI检查显示,乳腺癌NCT后原发肿瘤病灶大小显著缩小,边界多清晰可见,内部回声及后方回声倾向正常。有效组NCT前后病灶内的血流类型和RI值变化有统计学意义(P0.05),无效组NCT前后病灶内的血流类型和RI值无明显变化(P0.05)。结论:CDFI技术可对乳腺癌NCT前后病灶大小及病灶内部血流动力学变化提供客观参数,是评价乳腺癌NCT疗效的有效方法。     

Clinical and biomarker endpoint analysis in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials for breast cancer are now a widely accepted investigational approach for oncology cooperative group and pharmaceutical company research programs. However, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the most suitable endpoints for these studies, in part, because short-term clinical, radiological or biomarker responses have not been fully validated as surrogate endpoints that closely relate to long-term breast cancer outcome. This shortcoming must be addressed before neoadjuvant endocrine treatment can be used as a triage strategy designed to identify patients with endocrine therapy “curable” disease. In this summary, information from published studies is used as a basis to critique clinical trial designs and to suggest experimental endpoints for future validation studies. Three aspects of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy designs are considered: the determination of response; the assessment of surgical outcomes; and biomarker endpoint analysis. Data from the letrozole 024 (LET 024) trial that compared letrozole and tamoxifen is used to illustrate a combined endpoint analysis that integrates both clinical and biomarker information. In addition, the concept of a “cell cycle response” is explored as a simple post-treatment endpoint based on Ki67 analysis that might have properties similar to the pathological complete response endpoint used in neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials.     

Surgical issues surrounding use of aromatase inhibitors

There are important surgical issues related to the use of the third generation aromatase inhibitors in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy is effective at downstaging tumours, particularly large tumours initially thought to be inoperable or requiring mastectomy. Randomised trials have shown that the newer aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole increase the numbers of women who are suitable for breast-conservation compared with tamoxifen, and that letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of clinical response.

Aromatase inhibitors are most effective in ER-rich tumours and are clinically and biologically effective in both HER2 positive and negative tumours, whereas HER2 positive tumours show a level of resistance to tamoxifen.

In neoadjuvant studies comparing aromatase inhibitors with tamoxifen, the duration of use has been 3–4 months, by which time any response is usually evident but longer treatment periods produce continued shrinkage and response. The re-excision rate following breast conservation surgery after neoadjuvant hormone therapy is favourable compared with the rates following immediate wide local excision. Local recurrence rates are acceptable in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and breast-conserving surgery providing post-operative radiotherapy is given.

Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors, as well as having an effect on metastatic disease and survival, reduce local and regional recurrence.     

Immunogenic tumor cell death induced by chemoradiotherapy: molecular mechanisms and a clinical translation

Chemoradiotherapy can induce immunogenic cell death, triggering danger signals such as high-mobility group box 1 protein, and resulting in T-cell immunity. This concept can potentially be harnessed for clinical therapy to enhance tumor-specific immunity. There is however limited information to translate this theory directly in a clinical setting. In this review, we will discuss and summarize molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying immunogenic tumor cell death induced by chemoradiotherapy, with emphasis on a clinical translation.     

新辅助化疗配合手术治疗中晚期乳腺癌的临床效果分析

目的:观察新辅助化疗配合手术治疗中晚期乳腺癌的临床效果,为临床研究提供参考。方法:选取我院2009年5月-2011年4月收治的中晚期乳腺癌患者107例,根据治疗方法的不同,将患者分为新辅助化疗组和对照组。新辅助化疗组采取术前辅助化疗,而对照组术前不接受化疗。观察新辅助化疗组患者的近期临床疗效、毒副反应发生率;比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量等;术后随访三年,记录两组患者的肿瘤局部复发率及远处转移率。结果:新辅助化疗组患者治疗的总有效率为79.66%,毒副反应的发生率为33.89%;新辅助化疗组的平均手术时间、术中出血量均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。新辅助化疗组患者的局部复发率为5.08%,远处转移率为6.78%;对照组患者局部复发率为12.50%,远处转移率为18.75%。新辅助化疗组患者的肿瘤复发转移率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:在中晚期乳腺癌的临床治疗中,术前对患者实施新辅助化疗具有明显的效果,患者近期疗效良好,毒副反应可耐受,且手术后的复发转移率相对较低,值得推广应用。