Optimal method for efficiently removing extracellular nanofilaments from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

The identification, production, and potential electron conductivity of bacterial extracellular nanofilaments is an area of great study, specifically in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. While some studies focus on nanofilaments attached to the cellular body, many studies require the removal of these nanofilaments for downstream applications. The removal of nanofilaments from S. oneidensis MR-1 for further study requires not only that the nanofilaments be detached, but also for the cell bodies to remain intact. This is a study to both qualitatively (AFM) and quantitatively (LC/MS-MS) assess several nanofilament shearing methods and determine the optimal procedure. The best method for nanofilament removal, as judged by maximizing extracellular filamentous proteins and minimizing membrane and intracellular proteins, is vortexing a washed cell culture for 10 min.     

Methods for imaging Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 nanofilaments

Nanofilament production by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 was evaluated as a function of lifestyle (planktonic vs. sessile) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions using different sample preparation techniques prior to imaging with scanning electron microscopy. Nanofilaments could be imaged on MR-1 cells grown in biofilms or planktonically under both aerobic and anaerobic batch culture conditions after fixation, critical point drying and coating with a conductive metal. Critical point drying was a requirement for imaging nanofilaments attached to planktonically grown MR-1 cells, but not for cells grown in a biofilm. Techniques described in this paper cannot be used to differentiate nanowires from pili or flagella.     

Analysis of the contraction of an organelle using its birefringency: the R-fibre of the Ceratium (Dinoflagellate) flagellum

Some organelles responsible for contraction consist of bundles of 2-4 nm filaments called nanofilaments. Such organelles are present in the longitudinal flagellum of Ceratium (Dinoflagellate): the R-fibre is the motor system for contraction and parallels the axoneme, which is responsible for wave generation. We used a highly sensitive polarization microscope developed by one of the authors to measure the birefringence of these nanofilament bundles during contraction in vivo. Our results show that the R-fibre gives a highly birefringent signal, retarding the polarization to much the same extent irrespective of the direction of polarization. By rotating the axis of the microscope compensator we confirmed that the birefringence is positive, suggesting that the bundles run parallel to the longitudinal axis of the flagellum. Conversely, when the compensator was rotated contrary to the direction of retardation, the bundle appeared dark (except when the organelle was in a fully contracted state). Experiments performed on detergent-treated and ATP-reactivated flagella show that a portion of the flagella regained activity with the addition of ATP in the presence of low Ca(2+) concentrations. This demonstrates the ability to reactivate flagellar motility after permeabilization and that axonemal microtubules were not responsible for the strong flagellar birefringence. Combined with complementary data from DIC microscopy of demembranated flagella and electron microscopy, these findings have led to the development of a model of the R-fibre and a comparison with other types of birefringent nanofilament bundles, such as the myoneme of Acantharia.