Light-triggered action potentials in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum

The response to light of a liverwort, Conocephalum conicum L., measured as a change in the resting potential, consists of two stages. The first stage is a slight depolarization dependent on light intensity. This plays the role of a generator potential (GP) which induces the second stage - an action potential of the all-or-none character. Action potentials induced by light and by electrical stimuli have the same properties, i.e. identical time course, propagation velocity, and refractory periods. A summation occurs of sub threshold light stimuli and of light and electrical stimuli. The presence of 5⋅10-⁻⁶ M DCMU cancelled the light response and blocked - by inhibition of the electron transport chain - the mechanism leading to GP generation. However, this effect did not produce any change in the response to electrical stimuli.     

A moving boundary model of acrosomal elongation

A sperm penetrates an egg by extending a long, actin-filled tube known as the acrosomal process. This simple example of biomotility is one of the most dramatic. In Thyone, a 90 m process can extend in less than 10 s. Experiments have shown that actin monomers stored in the base of the sperm are transported to the growing tip of the acrosomal process where they add to the ends of the existing filaments.The force that drives the elongation of the acrosomal process has not yet been identified although the most frequently discussed candidate is the actin polymerization reaction. Developing what we believe are realistic moving boundary models of diffusion limited actin fiber polymerization, we show that actin filament growth occurs too slowly to drive acrosomal elongation. We thus believe that other forces, such as osmotically driven water flow, must play an important role in causing the elongation. We conjecture that actin polymerization merely follows to give the appropriate shape to the growing structure and to stabilize the structure once water flow ceases.Work partially supported by the United States Department of Energy     

Axillary bud flowering after apical decapitation in Pharbitis in relation to photoinduction

The flowering response of axillary buds of seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy, cv. Violet, was examined in relation to the timing of apical bud removal (plumule including the first leaf or second leaf) before or after a flower-inductive 16-h dark period. When the apical bud was removed well before the dark period, flower buds formed on the axillary shoots that subsequently developed, but when removed just before, or after, the dark period, different results were observed depending on the timing of the apical bud removal and plant age. In the case of 8-day-old seedlings, fewer flower buds formed on the axillary shoots developing from the cotyledonary node when plumules were removed 20 to 0 h before the dark period. When the apical bud was removed after the dark period, no flower buds formed. Using 14-day-old seedlings a similar reduction of flowering response was observed on the axillary shoots developing from the first leaf node when the apical bud was removed just after the dark period. To further elucidate the relationship between apical dominance and flowering, kinetin or IAA was applied to axillary buds or the cut site where the apical bud was located. Both chemicals influenced flowering, probably by modulating apical dominance which normally forces axillary buds to be dormant.     

Flower formation in the short-day plant Kalanchoë by grafting with a long-day and a short-long-day Echeveria

Flower formation was induced in the shortday plant Kalanchoë blossfeldiana Poellnitz under long-day conditions by grafting with flowering shoots of the short-long-day plant Echeveria harmsii (Rose) MacBr. and of the long-day plant Echeveria pulvoliver (E. pulvinata Rose x E. harmsii). Vegetative shoots from induced Echeveria plants failed to cause a flowering response in Kalanchoë. The presence of flowering and vegetative shoots side by side on induced Echeveria plants provides evidence for physiological chimeras in this genus.Abbreviations LD long day(s) - SD short day(s) - LDP long-day plant(s) - LSDP long-short-day plant(s) - SDP short-day plant(s) - SLDP short-long-day plant(s)     

The hatching stimulus for eggs of Aedes punctor (Diptera: Culicidae)

ABSTRACT.

• 1 Eggs of the British woodland mosquito, Aedes punctor (Kirby), were subjected to a variety of media in an attempt to determine the hatching stimulus.
• 2 It was found that continuous immersion in distilled water evoked almost no hatching (0.2%); intermittent removal from the water gave low hatching (8.9%).
• 3 Slow deoxygenation of the medium by either bacterial growth or the introduction of nitrogen produced the highest level of hatching (26.0–90.0%). Eggs of A.punctor were shown to hatch within a 4 h period of the oxygen concentration in the medium reaching zero.

     

Cholecystokinin and bombesin effects on rewarded and nonrewarded operants

Rats were food-rationed (15 g/day) and trained to bar-press for food. In Experiment 1, the animals were injected with cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK, 2 μg/kg), bombesin (BBS, 12 μg/kg), normal saline, or prefed with 20 Noyes 45 mg pellets. The animals were then tested for one hour for bar-pressing responses with food reward. In Experiment 2, the animals were similarly trained, treated, and tested for bar-pressing responses without food reward. The results showed that BBS and prefeeding decreased bar-pressing, rewarded or non-rewarded, but the CCK effect was greatly decreased when food was withheld. It appeared that the CCK effect was more dependent upon the presence of food than the BBS or prefeeding effects. The results were discussed in terms of involvement of the food and reward-related oropharyngeal stimuli for the CCK effect and the drive-related stimuli for the BBS and prefeeding effects.     

Determination of window size for analyzing DNA sequences

Summary DNA sequences are generally not random sequences. To show such nonrandomness visually, DNA sequence data are often plotted as moving averages for a certain length of window slid along a sequence. Here a simple algorithm is presented for determining the window size and for finding a nonrandom region of sequence.