Matrix solid‐phase dispersion with sand in chromatographic analysis of essential oils in herbs

Introduction – Matrix solid‐phase dispersion (MSPD) is a very simple, cheap and relatively quick sample preparation procedure which involves simultaneous disruption and extraction of various solid and semi‐solid samples due to the direct mechanical blending of the sample with a SPE sorbent, mainly C₁₈. Little is known about MSPD application as a sample preparation method for the analysis of essential oil components in herbs. Objective – To evaluate if C₁₈ sorbent, commonly used in MSPD process, can be substituted with sand in the procedure of essential oil analysis. Methodology – Essential oil extracts were obtained from mint, sage, chamomile, marjoram, savory and oregano using MSPD with C₁₈ sorbent or sand, pressurised liquid extraction and steam distillation. Their qualitative and quantitative compositions ware established by GC‐MS and GC‐FID. Results – The results prove that C₁₈ sorbent can be substituted with sand in the procedure of essential oil analysis in herbs. The recoveries of essential oil components estimated using MSPD/sand are almost equal to those using pressurised liquid extraction. Conclusion – The results presented in the paper reveal that MSPD with sand is suitable for the isolation of essential oil components from herbs. Its extraction efficiency is equivalent to pressurised liquid extraction, recognised as one of the most efficient extraction methods. The cost of MSPD procedure for essential oil analysis can be significantly diminished by substituting C₁₈ with sand. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Sea sand disruption method (SSDM) as a valuable tool for isolating essential oil components from conifers

Essential oils are one of nature's most precious gifts with surprisingly potent and outstanding properties. Coniferous oils, for instance, are nowadays being used extensively to treat or prevent many types of infections, modify immune responses, soothe inflammations, stabilize moods, and to help ease all forms of non-acute pain. Given the broad spectrum of usage of coniferous essential oils, a fast, safe, simple, and efficient sample-preparation method is needed in the estimation procedure of essential oil components in fresh plant material. Generally, the time- and energy-consuming steam distillation (SD) is applied for this purpose. This paper will compare SD, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), and the sea sand disruption method (SSDM) as isolation techniques to obtain aroma components from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), spruce (Picea abies), and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). According to the obtained data, SSDM is the most efficient sample preparation method in determining the essential oil composition of conifers. Moreover, SSDM requires small organic solvent amounts and a short extraction time, which makes it an advantageous alternative procedure for the routine analysis of coniferous oils. The superiority of SSDM over MSPD efficiency is ascertained, as there are no chemical interactions between the plant cell components and the sand. This fact confirms the reliability and efficacy of SSDM for the analysis of volatile oil components.     

Matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD)

A review of the many uses of matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) in the extraction and analysis of a variety of compounds from a range of samples is provided. Matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) has found particular application as a somewhat generic analytical process for the preparation, extraction and fractionation of solid, semi-solid and/or highly viscous biological samples. Its simplicity and flexibility contribute to it being chosen over more classical methods for these purposes. MSPD is based on several simple principles of chemistry and physics, involving forces applied to the sample by mechanical blending to produce complete sample disruption and the interactions of the sample matrix with a solid support bonded-phase (SPE) or the surface chemistry of other solid support materials. These principles are discussed as are the factors to be considered in conducting a MSPD extraction.     

Synthesis and characterization of a molecularly imprinted polymer and its application as SPE enrichment sorbent for determination of trace methimazole in pig samples using HPLC-UV

A novel molecularly imprinted polymer that could be applied as enrichment sorbent was prepared using methimazole (MMZ) as the template molecule, methacrylic acid as functional monomer, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as cross-linker. Though evaluated by static, kinetic and competitive adsorption tests, the polymer exhibited high adsorption capacity, fast kinetics and good selective ability. A method for determination of trace MMZ was developed using this polymer as enrichment sorbent coupled with high performance liquid chromatography focusing on complex biological matrices. Under the optimum experimental conditions, the MMZ standard is linear within the concentration range studied, that is, from 0.5 μg L⁻¹ to 150 μg L⁻¹ (r² = 0.9941). Lower limits of detection (LOD, at S/N = 3) and quantification (LOQ, at S/N = 10) in pig samples were 0.63 μg kg⁻¹ and 2.10 μg kg⁻¹ for kidney, 0.51 μg kg⁻¹ and 1.70 μg kg⁻¹ for liver, 0.56 μg kg⁻¹ and 1.86 μg kg⁻¹ for muscle, respectively. Recoveries and relative standard deviation (RSD, n = 9) values for precision in the developed method were from 71.14% to 88.41% and from 2.53% to 6.18%.     

Determination of the major constituents in fruit of Arctium lappa L. by matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction coupled with HPLC separation and fluorescence detection

The arctiin and arctigenin in the fruit of Arctium lappa L. were extracted by matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. The experimental conditions for the MSPD were optimized. Silica gel was selected as dispersion adsorbent and methanol as elution solvent. The calibration curve showed good relationship (r > 0.9998) in the concentration range of 0.010–5.0 μg mL⁻¹ for arctiin and 0.025–7.5 μg mL⁻¹ for arctigenin. The recoveries were between 74.4% and 100%. The proposed method consumed less sample, time and solvent compared with conventional methods, including ultrasonic and Soxhlet extraction.