Prognostic and diagnostic significance of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute heart failure: data from the ACE 2 Study

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic and prognostic value of mid-regional pro-ANP (MR-proANP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with acute dyspnea.

Methods: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were measured with commercial immunoassays at hospital admission (n?=?313), on day 2 (n?=?234), and before discharge (n?=?91) and compared for diagnosing acute heart failure (HF; n?=?143) and to predict mortality among patients with acute HF and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD; n?=?84) separately.

Results: The correlation coefficient between MR-proANP and NT-proBNP was 0.89 (p?<?0.001) and the receiver-operating area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.89) for MR-proANP and 0.86 (0.82–0.90) for NT-proBNP to diagnose acute HF. During a median follow-up of 816?days, mortality rates were 46% in acute HF patients and 42% in AECOPD patients. After adjustment for other risk variables by multivariate Cox regression analysis, MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with mortality in patients with acute HF, but only MR-proANP were associated with mortality among patients with AECOPD: hazard ratio (_lnMR-proANP) 1.98 (95% CI 1.17–3.34).

Conclusion: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations provide similar diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with acute HF. In contrast to NT-proBNP, MR-proANP measurements also provided independent prognostic information in AECOPD patients.     

Biomarker dynamics in cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study on MR-proADM,MR-proANP,hs-CRP and sP-selectin plasma levels in the perioperative period

Abstract

Background: For many biomarkers in cardiac surgery, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the normal dynamics of plasma levels during the perioperative course. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative dynamics of MR-proADM, MR-proANP, hs-CRP and sP-selectin in cardiac surgery.

Method: A prospective observational pilot study with 20 patients scheduled for open cardiac surgery procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Plasma samples were taken for each patient and biomarker during the pre-, per- and postoperative period until Day 6 postoperatively.

Results: MR-proADM increased significantly from 0.62 [IQR; 0.54–0.93]?nmol/L preoperatively to 1.20 [1.04–1.80]?nmol/L postoperative Day 1. MR-proANP increased significantly from 125 [77–152]?pmol/L preoperatively to 198 [168–307]?pmol/L on weaning from CPB. hs-CRP increased significantly from 2.5?mg/L [0.4–12] preoperatively to peak at 208?mg/L [186–239] postoperative Day 3. The preoperative level of sP-selectin at 23.0 [21.3–26.3]?ng/mL initially fell at weaning from CPB, followed by a significant peak of 25.5 [22.7–27.7]?ng/mL 8?h postoperatively.

Conclusions: The findings in this study may help to understand the physiology of the biomarkers analysed and their response to cardiac surgical trauma including CPB. Furthermore, these findings will guide us in further research on the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers.     

Diagnostic utility of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP in elderly outpatients with a high risk of heart failure: the Copenhagen heart failure risk study

Abstract

Background: Amino-terminal-pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (NT-proBNP) is a diagnostic biomarker for heart failure (HF), but plasma concentrations are influenced by numerous factors. Mid-regional-pro-atrial-natriuretic-peptide (MR-proANP) have comparable diagnostic value in acute HF. However, data are lacking in the non-acute setting. This study sought to assess the diagnostic utility of MR-proANP in outpatients with a high risk of HF.

Methods: This prospective study included 399 outpatients. Inclusion criteria were: age?≥?60?years, ≥1 risk factor for HF (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension), without known or suspected HF. Unrecognized HF was diagnosed based on clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms and echocardiography. Plasma concentrations of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were analysed.

Results: In total, 65 patients were diagnosed with HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (N?=?12 LVEF?≤?40%, N?=?7 LVEF?>?40% to ≤50%, N?=?46 LVEF?>?50%). Both MR-proANP (odds-ratio: 1.77; 95% CI:1.16–2.72; p?=?0.009) and NT-proBNP (odds-ratio: 1.49; 95% CI:1.22–1.82; p?<?0.001) were associated with HF. Area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was higher for MR-proANP (AUC?=?0.886; p?<?0.001) and NT-proBNP (AUC?=?0.910; p?<?0.001) compared to patient-reported symptoms of HF (AUC?=?0.830), but NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP (p?=?0.022).

Conclusions: Both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP are useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a non-acute setting. However, NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP.