A Note on the Theil-Sen Regression Estimator When the Regressor Is Random and the Error Term Is Heteroscedastic

In simple regression, two serious problems with the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator are that its efficiency can be relatively poor when the error term is normal but heteroscedastic, and the usual confidence interval for the slope can have highly unsatisfactory probability coverage. When the error term is nonnormal, these problems become exacerbated. Two other concerns are that the OLS estimator has an unbounded influence function and a breakdown point of zero. Wilcox (1996) compared several estimators when there is heteroscedasticity and found two that have relatively good efficiency and simultaneously provide protection against outliers: an M-estimator with Schweppe weights and an estimator proposed by Cohen, Dalal and Tukey (1993). However, the M-estimator can handle only one outlier in the X-domain or among the Y values, and among the methods considered by Wilcox for computing confidence intervals for the slope, none performed well when working with the Cohen-Dalal-Tukey estimator. This note points out that the small-sample efficiency of theTheil-Sen estimator competes well with the estimators considered by Wilcox, and a method for computing a confidence interval was found that performs well in simulations. The Theil-Sen estimator has a reasonably high breakdown point, a bounded influence function, and in some cases its small-sample efficiency offers a substantial advantage over all of the estimators compared in Wilcox (1996).     

A Robust Test for Multi-Sample Location Problems with Unequal Group Variances and Nonnormality

A robust test (to be referred to as M^* test) is proposed for testing equality of several group means without assuming normality and equality of variances. This test statistic is obtained by combining Tiku's MML robust procedure with the James statistic. Monte Carlo simulation studies indicate that the M^* test is more powerful than the Welch test, the James test, and the tests based on Huber's M-estimators over a wide range of nonnormal universes. It is also more powerful than the Brown and Forsythe test under most of nonnormal distributions and has substantially the same power as the Brown and Forsythe test under normal distribution. Comparing with Tan-Tabatabai test, M^* is almost as powerful as Tan-Tabatabai test.     

Robuste schätzungen: Ein anwendungsorientierter Überblick

The paper offers an introductory survey of the area of robust estimation for applied statisticians, without demanding much mathematics. At first, the most important basic ideas of the robustness theory are explained using an example from the analysis of variance. Then the general reasons for and limits of the “robustification” of statistics are delineated. In particular, the various types of deviations from ideal models, such as gross errors, are discussed and their consequences are pointed out. The next part describes several simple robust estimators and their properties, ending with an outlook on robust estimators in linear models. As an appendix a number of frequent objections to and misunderstandings of robustness theory are discussed, refuted and clarified.