Aggregation as a cost-reducing strategy for lycaenid larvae

If a mutualistic relationship entails providing services ata cost, selection will favor individuals that maximize the netbenefits of the interaction and minimize the costs. Larvae ofmany species of lycaenid butterflies secrete nutritious foodrewards to attending ants and, in return, receive protectionagainst predators and parasitoids. Because ants typically recruitmore workers to larger resources, by forming groups the larvaemay ensure more reliable access to ants and thereby gain betterprotection. A further consequence of aggregating should be achange of the cost-benefit relationship for individual larvae.The larger the group, the smaller a single larva's influencewill be on total ant density, which could lead to a smallerinvestment in secretion, thus reducing the per capita cost ofcooperation. In this study, die influence of ant attendance,group size, and companion quality on larval investment was investigated.The interaction between the obligately ant-dependent lycaenid,Jalmanus evagoras, and its attendant Iridomyrmax ants was manipulatedand the effect on larval secretion measured. As the level ofant attendance increased, the delivery of food rewards increased,bodi for solitary and for aggregated larvae. When aggregated,larvae provided less food rewards to ants dun when solitary,and secretion rate decreased with increasing group size. Furthermore,larvae had lower secretion rates when paired with a bigger,more attractive larva than when paired with a smaller one. Theconsiderable reduction in secretion rates for larvae in groupssuggests that gaining protection at a lower secretion cost couldbe one factor that promotes aggregation in myrmecophilous lycaenids.     

The effect of host-plant quality on the survival of larvae and oviposition by adults of an ant-tended lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras

Abstract.

• 1 Juveniles of the Australian lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagorus (Donovan), secrete to ants a solution of sugars and amino acids, primarily serine. The attendant ants protect the larvae and pupae from parasites and predators.
• 2 The effect of caterpillar nutrition on the defence provided by ants was investigated. Potted food plants of Acacia decurrens were either given water containing nitrogenous fertilizer or were given water alone. Fertilized plants had a higher nitrogen content than unfertilized plants.
• 3 Fifth instar larvae of J.evagoras feeding on fertilized plants attracted a larger ant guard than those feeding on unfertilized plants. In the absence of caterpillars, ants were not differentially attracted to fertilized and unfertilized plants.
• 4 In the presence of ants, over a 10-day period, larvae on fertilized plants survived better than larvae on unfertilized plants. In the absence of ants larvae survived equally on fertilized and unfertilized plants. It is concluded that larvae on fertilized plants attracted a larger ant guard, and thereby survived better, than larvae on unfertilized plants.
• 5 Adult females of J. evagoras preferred to lay egg batches on fertiized, rather than unfertilized plants, but they did not lay larger egg batches.

     

Lack of compensation by final instar larvae of the myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly,Jalmenus evagoras,for the loss of nutrients to ants

Abstract Larvae and pupae of the Australian lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras Donovan (Lepidoptera; Lycaenidae), are protected from parasites and predators by attendant ants. In return, the juveniles of J. evagoras secrete to the ants a solution containing substantial amounts of sugars and amino acids. Larvae of J. evagoras were reared from hatching until adult eclosion either with or without ants. Experiments were performed to examine whether fifth (final) instar larvae attempt to compensate for the nutrient loss to ants, by consuming more food, digesting food more efficiently, or extending development time. The presence or absence of ants had no effect on the feeding rate, efficiency of digestion or development time of fifth instar larvae. Larvae with ants converted a smaller proportion of ingested food into biomass, and consequently grew less than their counterparts without ants. Thus fifth instar larvae of J. evagoras do not appear to compensate for the nutrient loss to ants. Possible reasons for the failure to compensate are discussed.