Directed mutagenesis identifies amino acid residues involved in elongation factor Tu binding to yeast Phe-tRNAPhe

The co-crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus elongation factor Tu.guanosine 5'- [beta,gamma-imido]triphosphate (EF-Tu.GDPNP) bound to yeast Phe-tRNA(Phe) reveals that EF-Tu interacts with the tRNA body primarily through contacts with the phosphodiester backbone. Twenty amino acids in the tRNA binding cleft of Thermus Thermophilus EF-Tu were each mutated to structurally conservative alternatives and the affinities of the mutant proteins to yeast Phe-tRNA(Phe) determined. Eleven of the 20 mutations reduced the binding affinity from fourfold to >100-fold, while the remaining ten had no effect. The thermodynamically important residues were spread over the entire tRNA binding interface, but were concentrated in the region which contacts the tRNA T-stem. Most of the data could be reconciled by considering the crystal structures of both free EF-Tu.GTP and the ternary complex and allowing for small (1.0 A) movements in the amino acid side-chains. Thus, despite the non-physiological crystallization conditions and crystal lattice interactions, the crystal structures reflect the biochemically relevant interaction in solution.     

Intramolecular Movements in EF-G, Trapped at Different Stages in Its GTP Hydrolytic Cycle, Probed by FRET

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is one of several GTP hydrolytic proteins (GTPases) that cycles repeatedly on and off the ribosome during protein synthesis in bacterial cells. In the functional cycle of EF-G, hydrolysis of guanosine 5′-triphosphate (GTP) is coupled to tRNA-mRNA translocation in ribosomes. GTP hydrolysis induces conformational rearrangements in two switch elements in the G domain of EF-G and other GTPases. These switch elements are thought to initiate the cascade of events that lead to translocation and EF-G cycling between ribosomes. To further define the coupling mechanism, we developed a new fluorescent approach that can detect intramolecular movements in EF-G. We attached a fluorescent probe to the switch I element (sw1) of Escherichia coli EF-G. We monitored the position of the sw1 probe, relative to another fluorescent probe anchored to the GTP substrate or product, by measuring the distance-dependent, Förster resonance energy transfer between the two probes. By analyzing EF-G trapped at five different functional states in its cycle, we could infer the cyclical movements of sw1 within EF-G. Our results provide evidence for conformational changes in sw1, which help to drive the unidirectional EF-G cycle during protein synthesis. More generally, our approach might also serve to define the conformational dynamics of other GTPases with their cellular receptors.     

Class-1 release factor eRF1 promotes GTP binding by class-2 release factor eRF3

In eukaryotes, termination of mRNA translation is triggered by the essential polypeptide chain release factors eRF1, recognizing all three stop codons, and eRF3, a member of the GTPase superfamily with a role that has remained opaque. We have studied the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the interactions between eRF3 and GTP, GDP and the non-hydrolysable GTP analogue GDPNP in the presence (K(D)(GDP)=1.3+/-0.2 muM, K(D)(GTP) approximately 200 muM and K(D)(GDPNP)>160 muM) as well as absence (K(D)(GDP)=1.9+/-0.3 muM, K(D)(GTP) 0.7+/-0.2 muM and K(D)(GDPNP) approximately 200 muM) of eRF1. From the present data we propose that (i) free eRF3 has a strong preference to bind GDP compared to GTP (ii) eRF3 in complex with eRF1 has much stronger affinity to GTP than free eRF3 (iii) eRF3 in complex with PABP has weak affinity to GTP (iv) eRF3 in complex with eRF1 does not have strong affinity to GDPNP, implying that GDPNP is a poor analogue of GTP for eRF3 binding.     

Visualization of the eEF2-80S ribosome transition-state complex by cryo-electron microscopy

In an attempt to understand ribosome-induced GTP hydrolysis on eEF2, we determined a 12.6-Å cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of the eEF2-bound 80S ribosome in the presence of aluminum tetrafluoride and GDP, with aluminum tetrafluoride mimicking the γ-phosphate during hydrolysis. This is the first visualization of a structure representing a transition-state complex on the ribosome. Tight interactions are observed between the factor's G domain and the large ribosomal subunit, as well as between domain IV and an intersubunit bridge. In contrast, some of the domains of eEF2 implicated in small subunit binding display a large degree of flexibility. Furthermore, we find support for a transition-state model conformation of the switch I region in this complex where the reoriented switch I region interacts with a conserved rRNA region of the 40S subunit formed by loops of the 18S RNA helices 8 and 14. This complex is structurally distinct from the eEF2-bound 80S ribosome complexes previously reported, and analysis of this map sheds light on the GTPase-coupled translocation mechanism.     

Dynamics of Recognition between tRNA and elongation factor Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) binds to all standard aminoacyl transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) and transports them to the ribosome while protecting the ester linkage between the tRNA and its cognate amino acid. We use molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the dynamics of the EF-Tu·guanosine 5′-triphosphate·aa-tRNA^Cys complex and the roles played by Mg²⁺ ions and modified nucleosides on the free energy of protein·RNA binding. Individual modified nucleosides have pronounced effects on the structural dynamics of tRNA and the EF-Tu·Cys-tRNA^Cys interface. Combined energetic and evolutionary analyses identify the coevolution of residues in EF-Tu and aa-tRNAs at the binding interface. Highly conserved EF-Tu residues are responsible for both attracting aa-tRNAs as well as providing nearby nonbonded repulsive energies that help fine-tune molecular attraction at the binding interface. In addition to the 3′ CCA end, highly conserved tRNA nucleotides G1, G52, G53, and U54 contribute significantly to EF-Tu binding energies. Modification of U54 to thymine affects the structure of the tRNA common loop resulting in a change in binding interface contacts. In addition, other nucleotides, conserved within certain tRNA specificities, may be responsible for tuning aa-tRNA binding to EF-Tu. The trend in EF-Tu·Cys-tRNA^Cys binding energies observed as the result of mutating the tRNA agrees with experimental observation. We also predict variations in binding free energies upon misacylation of tRNA^Cys with d-cysteine or O-phosphoserine and upon changing the protonation state of l-cysteine. Principal components analysis in each case reveals changes in the communication network across the protein·tRNA interface and is the basis for the entropy calculations.     

Elongation factor Tu-targeted antibiotics: four different structures, two mechanisms of action

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), the carrier of aa-tRNA to the mRNA-programmed ribosome, is the target of four families of antibiotics of unrelated structure, of which the action is supported by two basic mechanisms. Kirromycin and enacyloxin block EF-Tu.GDP on the ribosome; pulvomycin and GE2270 A inhibit the interaction of EF-Tu.GTP with aa-tRNA. The crystallographic analysis has unveiled the structural background of their actions, explaining how antibiotics of unrelated structures and binding modes and sites can employ similar mechanism of action. The selective similarities and differences of their binding sites and the induced EF-Tu conformations make understand how nature can affect the activities of a complex regulatory enzyme by means of low-molecular compounds, and have proposed a suitable approach for drug design.     

Thermodynamic analysis reveals that GTP binding affects the interaction between the alpha- and gamma-subunits of translation initiation factor 2

Eukaryotic and archaeal translation initiation factors 2, heterotrimers that consist of α-, β-, and γ-subunits, deliver methionylated initiator tRNA to a small ribosomal subunit in a manner that depends on GTP. To evaluate correlation of the function and association of the subunits, we used isothermal titration calorimetry to analyze the thermodynamics of the interactions between the α- and γ-subunits in the presence or absence of a nonhydrolyzable GTP analog or GDP. The α-subunits bound to the γ-subunit with large heat capacity change (ΔC_p) values. The ΔH and ΔC_p values for the interaction between the α- and γ-subunits varied in the presence of the GTP analog but not in the presence of GDP. These results suggest that the binding of both the α-subunit and GTP changes the conformation of the switch region of the γ-subunit and increases the affinity of the γ-subunit for tRNA.     

Ribosome-small-subunit-dependent GTPase interacts with tRNA-binding sites on the ribosome

RsgA (ribosome-small-subunit-dependent GTPase A, also known as YjeQ) is a unique GTPase in that guanosine triphosphate hydrolytic activity is activated by the small subunit of the ribosome. Disruption of the gene for RsgA from the genome affects the growth of cells, the subunit association of the ribosome, and the maturation of 16S rRNA. To study the interaction of Escherichia coli RsgA with the ribosome, chemical modifications using dimethylsulfate and kethoxal were performed on the small subunit in the presence or in the absence of RsgA. The chemical reactivities at G530, A790, G925, G926, G966, C1054, G1339, G1405, A1413, and A1493 in 16S rRNA were reduced, while those at A532, A923, G1392, A1408, A1468, and A1483 were enhanced, by the addition of RsgA, together with 5′-guanylylimidodiphosphate. Among them, the chemical reactivities at A532, A790, A923, G925, G926, C1054, G1392, A1413, A1468, A1483, and A1493 were not changed when RsgA was added together with GDP. These results indicate that the binding of RsgA induces conformational changes around the A site, P site, and helix 44, and that guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis induces partial conformational restoration, especially in the head, to dissociate RsgA from the small subunit. RsgA has the capacity to coexist with mRNA in the ribosome while it promotes dissociation of tRNA from the ribosome.     

Crosslinking of translation factor EF-G to proteins of the bacterial ribosome before and after translocation

Elongation factor G (EF-G) promotes the translocation of tRNA and mRNA in the central cavity of the ribosome following the addition of each amino acid residue to a growing polypeptide chain. tRNA/mRNA translocation is coupled to GTP hydrolysis, catalyzed by EF-G and activated by the ribosome. In this study we probed EF-G interactions with ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) of the bacterial ribosome, by using a combination of chemical crosslinking, immunoblotting and mass spectroscopy analyses. We identified three bacterial r-proteins (L7/L12, S12 and L6) crosslinked to specific residues of EF-G in three of its domains (G', 3 and 5, respectively). EF-G crosslinks to L7/L12 and S12 were indistinguishable when EF-G was trapped on the ribosome before or after tRNA/mRNA translocation had occurred, whereas a crosslink between EF-G and L6 formed with greater efficiency before translocation had occurred. EF-G crosslinked to L7/L12 was capable of catalyzing multiple rounds of GTP hydrolysis, whereas EF-G crosslinked to S12 was inactive in GTP hydrolysis. These results imply that during the GTP hydrolytic cycle EF-G must detach from S12 within the central cavity of the ribosome, while EF-G can remain associated with L7/L12 located on one of the peripheral stalks of the ribosome. This mechanism may ensure that a single GTP molecule is hydrolyzed for each tRNA/mRNA translocation event.     

Structural basis for RanGTP independent entry of spliceosomal U snRNPs into the nucleus

The nuclear import of assembled spliceosomal subunits, the uridine-rich small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (U snRNPs), is mediated by a nuclear import receptor adaptor couple of importinβ (Impβ) and snurportin1 (SPN1). In contrast to any other characterized active nuclear import, the Impβ/SPN1/U snRNP complex does not require RanGTP for the terminal release from the nuclear basket of the nuclear pore complex (NPC). The crystal structure of Impβ (127-876) in complex with the Impβ-binding (IBB) domain of SPN1 (1-65) at 2.8-Å resolution reveals that Impβ adopts an open conformation, which is unique for a functional Impβ/cargo complex, and rather surprisingly, it resembles the conformation of the Impβ/RanGTP complex. As binding of RanGTP to Impβ usually triggers the release of import complexes from the NPC, we propose that by already mimicking a conformation similar to Impβ/RanGTP the independent dissociation of Impβ/SPN1 from the nuclear basket is energetically aided.