Racial disparities in treatment and survival from ovarian cancer

BackgroundBlack women with ovarian cancer in the U.S. have lower survival than whites. We aimed to identify factors associated with racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment and overall survival (OS).MethodsWe examined data from 365 white and 95 black ovarian cancer patients from the Hollings Cancer Center Cancer Registry in Charleston, S.C. between 2000 and 2015. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between race and receipt of surgery and chemotherapy, and Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs between race and OS. Model variables included diagnosis center, stage, histology, insurance status, smoking, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACI) and residual disease. Interactions between race and AACI were assessed using −2 log likelihood tests.ResultsBlacks vs. whites were over two-fold less likely to receive a surgery-chemotherapy sequence (multivariable-adjusted OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.43–4.21), particularly if they had a higher AACI (interaction p = 0.008). In multivariable-adjusted Cox models, black women were at higher risk of death (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.35–2.43) than whites, even when restricted to patients who received a surgery-chemotherapy sequence (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.10–2.89) and particularly for those with higher AACI (HR 4.70, 95% CI 2.00 − 11.02, interaction p = 0.01).ConclusionsAmong blacks, higher comorbidity associates with less chance of receiving guideline-based treatment and also modifies OS. Differences in receipt of guideline-based care do not completely explain survival differences between blacks and whites with ovarian cancer. These results highlight opportunities for further research.     

Disparities in the risk of the ER/PR/HER2 breast cancer subtypes among Asian Americans in California

BackgroundPopulation-based studies of breast cancer often aggregate all Asians into a single category termed Asian/Pacific Islander (API).Purpose(1) Describe the demographic and clinicopathologic features of early breast cancer utilizing all eight ER/PR/HER2 subtypes among white, black, Hispanic, American Indian, seven Asian ethnicities, and the aggregate API category; (2) ascertain the risk of the ER+/PR+/HER2+, ER−/PR−/HER2−, and ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes when compared with the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype, among seven Asian ethnicities versus non-Hispanic white women and (3) contrast the results with the risk of these same subtypes when using the aggregate API category.MethodsUsing the California Cancer Registry, we identified 225,441 cases of stages 1–4 first primary female invasive breast cancer. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of race with the ER+/PR+/HER2+, ER−/PR−/HER2− (triple-negative), and the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes versus the ER+/PR+/HER2− when adjusted for stage, age, tumor grade, and socioeconomic status. Models were fit separately for each subtype. Odds ratios for the seven Asian ethnicities and the aggregate API category using non-Hispanic white women as the reference category were computed.ResultsThere was an increased risk of the ER+/PR+/HER2+ subtype for the combined API category (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.09–1.23). But only Southeast Asians (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.04–1.31), Filipino (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.12–1.36), and Korean (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.38–1.99) women had an increased risk of this subtype. The reduced risk of the triple-negative subtype seen in APIs (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.79–0.90) was only noted in Chinese (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.70–0.91) and Filipino (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.58–0.73) women whereas Indian Continent (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01–1.53) women had an increased risk of the triple-negative subtype.The race × stage interaction was statistically significant for the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype (p < 0.05). When stratified by stage, there was no statistically significant association of race with subtype in stages 3 and 4. APIs had an increased risk of the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype in stage 1 (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.37–1.75) and stage 2 (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.28–1.58) but this risk was not seen in Pacific Islander, Indian Continent, and Japanese women for either stage.ConclusionsAmong the Asian ethnicities, there is marked variability in the demographic and clinicopathologic features of breast cancer. Use of the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes reveals that the risk of the ER−/PR−/HER2−, ER+/PR+/HER2+, and ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes varies among the Asian population. The API category, is sometimes, but not always reflective of all Asian women.     

Breast cancer staging by subtype in the Lower Mississippi Delta region States

IntroductionTo evaluate disparities in breast cancer stage by subtype (categorizations of breast cancer based upon molecular characteristics) in the Delta Regional Authority (Delta), an impoverished region across eight Lower Mississippi Delta Region (LMDR) states with a high proportion of Black residents and high breast cancer mortality rates.MethodsWe used population-based cancer registry data from seven of the eight LMDR states to explore breast cancer staging (early and late) differences by subtype between the Delta and non-Delta in the LMDR and between White and Black women within the Delta. Age-adjusted incidence rates and rate ratios were calculated to examine regional and racial differences. Multilevel negative binomial regression models were constructed to evaluate how individual-level and area-level factors affect rates of early- and late-stage breast cancers by subtype.ResultsFor all subtypes combined, there were no Delta/non-Delta differences in early and late stage breast cancers. Delta women had lower rates of hormone-receptor (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2-) and higher rates of HR-/HER2- (the most aggressive subtype) early and late stage cancers, respectively, but these elevated rates were attenuated in multilevel models. Within the Delta, Black women had higher rates of late-stage breast cancer than White women for most subtypes; elevated late-stage rates of all subtypes combined remained in Black women in multilevel analysis (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.04–1.15).ConclusionsBlack women in the Delta had higher rates of late-stage cancers across subtypes. Culturally competent interventions targeting risk-appropriate screening modalities should be scaled up in the Delta to improve early detection.     

American Indian/Alaska Native and black colon cancer patients have poorer cause-specific survival based on disease stage and anatomic site of diagnosis

ObjectivesStudies of race-specific colon cancer (CC) survival differences between right- vs. left-sided CC typically focus on Black and White persons and often consider all CC stages as one group. To more completely examine potential racial and ethnic disparities in side- and stage-specific survival, we evaluated 5-year CC cause-specific survival probabilities for five racial/ethnic groups by anatomic site (right or left colon) and stage (local, regional, distant).MethodsWe obtained cause-specific survival probability estimates from National Cancer Institute’s population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) for CC patients grouped by five racial/ethnic groups (Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native [AIAN], Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander [API], Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and Non-Hispanic White [NHW]), anatomic site, stage, and other patient and SEER registry characteristics. We used meta-regression approaches to identify factors that explained differences in cause-specific survival.ResultsDiagnoses of distant-stage CC were more common among NHB and AIAN persons (>22 %) than among NHW and API persons (< 20 %). Large disparities in anatomic site-specific survival were not apparent. Those with right-sided distant-stage CC had a one-year cause-specific survival probability that was 16.4 % points lower (99 % CI: 12.2–20.6) than those with left-sided distant-stage CC; this difference decreased over follow-up. Cause-specific survival probabilities were highest for API, and lowest for NHB, persons, though these differences varied substantially by stage at diagnosis. AIAN persons with localized-stage CC, and NHB persons with regional- and distant-stage CC, had significantly lower survival probabilities across follow-up.ConclusionsThere are differences in CC presentation according to anatomic site and disease stage among patients of distinct racial and ethnic backgrounds. This, coupled with the reality that there are persistent survival disparities, with NHB and AIAN persons experiencing worse prognosis, suggests that there are social or structural determinants of these disparities. Further research is needed to confirm whether these CC cause-specific survival disparities are due to differences in risk factors, screening patterns, cancer treatment, or surveillance, in order to overcome the existing differences in outcome.     

Measuring disparities in event-free survival among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an academic institute in Oklahoma, 2005–2019

BackgroundAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common type of childhood cancer. While there have been successes in the treatment of leukemia, less information is available on reasons for disparities in event-free survival (EFS) among underserved populations.MethodsWe partnered with a children’s hospital at an academic institution to abstract data from the institution’s cancer registry, the state cancer registry, and electronic medical records on cancer diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for children with ALL (n = 275) diagnosed from 2005 to 2019 prior to age 20. We evaluated the relation between 1) race/ethnicity, 2) distance to the children’s hospital, and 3) area deprivation with EFS, defined as time from diagnosis to relapse, death, or the end of the study period. We evaluated differences in EFS using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test. We used the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for multivariable survival analyses.ResultsMost children were diagnosed with ALL under five years of age (45%) and with Pre-B ALL (87%). Twelve percent of children experienced a relapse and 5% died during induction or remission. EFS at 5 years was 82%. Non-Hispanic (NH) Black children had worse, though imprecise, EFS compared to NH White children (Adjusted Hazard Ratio: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.80, 5.38). Children residing in areas with higher deprivation had a higher adjusted hazard of poor outcomes compared to the least deprived areas, though estimates were imprecise (2nd quartile HR: 1.51, 3rd quartile: 1.85, 4th quartile: 1.62). We observed no association between distance to the children’s hospital and EFS.ConclusionWe observed poorer EFS for NH Black children and children residing in areas with high deprivation, though the estimates were not statistically significant. Our next steps include further evaluating socioeconomic factors in both rural and urban children to identify disparities in outcomes for children with ALL and other childhood cancers.     

Social disparities in survival after diagnosis with colorectal cancer: Contribution of race and insurance status

BackgroundBoth minority race and lack of health insurance are risk factors for lower survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) but the interaction between the two factors has not been explored in detail.MethodsOne to 5-year survival by race/ethnic group and insurance type for patients with CRC diagnosed in 2007-13 and registered in the Surveillance Epidemiology, and EndResultsdatabase were explored. Shared frailty models were computed to further explore the association between CRC specific survival and insurance status after adjustment for demographic and treatment variables.ResultsAge-adjusted 5-year survival estimates were 70.4% for non-Hispanic whites (nHW), 62.7% for non-Hispanic blacks (nHB), 70.2% for Hispanics, 64.7% for Native Americans, and 73.1% for Asian/Pacific Islanders (API). Survival was greater for patients with insurance other than Medicaid for all races, but the differential in survival varied with race, with the greatest difference being seen for nHW at +25.0% and +20.2%, respectively, for Medicaid and uninsured versus other insurance. Similar results were observed for stage- and age-specific analyses, with survival being consistently higher for nHW and API compared to other groups. After confounder adjustment, hazard ratios of 1.53 and 1.50 for CRC-specific survival were observed for Medicaid and uninsured. Racial/ethnic differences remained significant only for nHB compared to nHW.ConclusionsRace/ethnic group and insurance type are partially independent factors affecting survival expectations for patients diagnosed with CRC. NHB had lower than expected survival for all insurance types.     

Pain trends and pain growth disparities, 2009–2021

Physical pain is a major public health concern. Yet evidence on trends in physical pain around the world barely exists. Using nationally representative data from 146 countries (N = 1.6 million respondents), this paper finds that, all over the world, the percentage of people in pain increased from 26.3 in 2009 to 32.1 in 2021. This rising trend was present in both higher- and lower-income countries. This article also documents pain disparities: In the worldwide population, pain grew faster among women, the less educated, and the poor. Although the aggregate level of pain was greater among the elderly (> 60 years old), the growth in pain was faster among the younger (< 35 years old). These findings hold after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Disparities of pain growth in higher- and lower-income nations and potential explanatory factors are also discussed. Understanding how the level of pain varies over time and across demographic groups is crucial to evaluate and shape public health policies.     

Diagnostic route is associated with care satisfaction independently of tumour stage: Evidence from linked English Cancer Patient Experience Survey and cancer registration data

BackgroundWhether diagnostic route (e.g. emergency presentation) is associated with cancer care experience independently of tumour stage is unknown.MethodsWe analysed data on 18 590 patients with breast, prostate, colon, lung, and rectal cancers who responded to the 2014 English Cancer Patient Experience Survey, linked to cancer registration data on diagnostic route and tumour stage at diagnosis. We estimated odds ratios (OR) of reporting a negative experience of overall cancer care by tumour stage and diagnostic route (crude and adjusted for patient characteristic and cancer site variables) and examined their interactions with cancer site.ResultsAfter adjustment, the likelihood of reporting a negative experience was highest for emergency presenters and lowest for screening-detected patients with breast, colon, and rectal cancers (OR versus two-week-wait 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–1.83; 0.88, 95% CI 0.75–1.03, respectively). Patients with the most advanced stage were more likely to report a negative experience (OR stage IV versus I 1.37, 95% CI 1.15–1.62) with little confounding between stage and route, and no evidence for cancer-stage or cancer-route interactions.ConclusionsThough the extent of disease is strongly associated with ratings of overall cancer care, diagnostic route (particularly emergency presentation or screening detection) exerts important independent effects.     

Focus: Health Equity: COVID-19 Healthcare Inequity: Lessons Learned from Annual Influenza Vaccination Rates to Mitigate COVID-19 Vaccine Disparities

The COVID-19 pandemic has infected 33 million Americans and resulted in more than 600,000 deaths as of late Spring 2021. Black, Indigenous, and Latinx (BIL) people are disproportionately infected, hospitalized, and dying. Effective vaccines were rapidly developed and have been widely available in the United States since their initial rollout in late 2020-early 2021 but vaccination rates in BIL communities have remained low compared with non-BIL communities. Limited access to the vaccine, lack of customized information, and mistrust of the medical system, all contribute to vaccine hesitancy and low vaccination rates. Regrettably, COVID-19 is not the only vaccine-preventable illness with racial/ethnic inequities. Similar inequities are seen with the seasonal influenza vaccine. We review the racial/ethnic health disparities in COVID-19 illness and vaccination rates and what inequities contribute to these disparities. We use evidence from the seasonal influenza vaccination efforts to inform potential strategies to attenuate these inequities. The development of effective and sustainable strategies to improve vaccination rates and reduce factors that result in health inequities is essential in managing current and future pandemics and promoting improved health for all communities.     

Focus: Health Equity: An Overview of Health Disparities in Asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by inflammation in the respiratory airways which manifests clinically with wheezing, cough, and episodic periods of chest tightness; if left untreated it can lead to permanent obstruction or death. In the US, asthma affects all ages and genders, and individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately burdened by this disease. The financial cost of asthma exceeds $81 billion every year and despite all the resources invested, asthma is responsible for over 3,500 deaths annually in the nation. In this overview, we highlight important factors associated with health disparities in asthma. While they are complex and overlap, we group these factors in five domains: biological, behavioral, socio-cultural, built environment, and health systems. We review the biological domain in detail, which traditionally has been best studied. We also acknowledge that implicit and explicit racism is an important contributor to asthma disparities and responsible for many of the socio-environmental factors that worsen outcomes in this disease.