Factors affecting nuclear maturation, cleavage and embryo development of vitrified bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes

The objective was to investigate the effects of cryodevice, vitrification solutions, and equilibration time on in vitro maturation, cleavage, and embryo development of vitrified bovine oocytes. In Experiment 1, the nuclear maturation (MII) rate of immature bovine COCs vitrified was compared between two equilibration times (0 vs 10 min) in vitrification solution 1 (VS1) and two cryodevices (cryotop vs 0.25 mL straw). The MII rate was higher in the non-vitrified control group than in vitrified groups (61 vs 16%, P < 0.0001). Equilibration time did not affect MII rate (P = 0.964); however, the MII rate was higher for COCs vitrified on cryotops than in straws (23 vs 9%, P = 0.007). In Experiment 2, bovine COCs were vitrified on cryotops using two equilibration times (0 vs 5 min) in VS1 and two kinds of vitrification solutions (freshly prepared vs frozen). Cleavage and blastocyst rates were higher (P < 0.0001) in the non-vitrified control group than vitrified groups (cleavage rate 93 vs 42% and blastocysts rate 31 vs 0.4%). Cleavage rate of COCs vitrified using frozen solutions with 5 min equilibration was higher (P = 0.05) than other treatment groups. However, blastocyst rate did not differ (P = 0.993) among treatment groups. In conclusion, cryotop was a better cryodevice than 0.25 mL straw for vitrification of bovine COCs. Furthermore, 5 min equilibration in VS1 improved cleavage. Compared with control, the vitrification procedure per se damaged bovine COCs, resulting in poor nuclear maturation and embryo development. However, vitrification did not immediately kill oocytes, as the cleavage rate was acceptable.     

New device for the vitrification and in-straw warming of in vitro produced bovine embryos

Two experiments were designed to test the use of a new device designed to vitrify and in-straw warm in vitro produced (IVP) embryos, which can potentially be used for their direct transfer to recipient females in field conditions. In experiment 1, IVP embryos from both prepubertal and adult animals were vitrified on cryotops and warmed in steps (1, 0.5 and 0 M sucrose; protocol W3) or directly in 0.5 M (protocol W1/0.5) or 0 M sucrose (protocol W1/0). Similar survival rates were recorded 24 h after warming for calf embryos irrespective of the warming procedure (W3: 79.2%, W1/0.5: 62.5%, W1/0: 66.7%). For cow embryos, survival rates at 24 h post-warming were significantly higher when embryos were warmed using the W3 (85.7%) or W1/0.5 (89.1%) protocols compared to the W1/0 protocol (70.5%). In experiment 2, IVP embryos were vitrified on the new designed device followed by their in-straw cryoprotectant (0.5 M sucrose) dilution/warming and different warming temperatures (45, 50, 60 and 70 °C) were tested. When warming solution passed through the new vitrification/warming device at 45 °C, 61.5% of blastocysts were fully re-expanded or hatched at 24 h post-warming, being not significantly different to the control (65%). Other warming temperatures triggered significantly lower survival rates at 24 h post-warming. No significant differences were detected in total cell numbers and blastocyst apoptosis indices in response to vitrification followed by warming at 45 °C respect to the control. Our findings indicate that the new device allows vitrification and in-straw warming of IVP bovine embryos, being a useful option for their direct transfer in field conditions.