The development of Archaeopteris: new evolutionary characters from the structural analysis of an Early Famennian trunk from southeast Morocco

A 5 m long trunk of a young Archaeopteris/Callixylon erianum tree from the Late Devonian of Morocco shows new branching patterns for early lignophytes. This progymnosperm tree produces a helical pattern of traces that we infer belonged to reduced, short-lived, primary (apical) branches (type A) as well as two types of adventitious traces (types B and H). We infer that type-B traces supplied branches that initiate close to the site of attachment on the trunk of some, but not all type-A branches in an irregular but nonrandom pattern. Unlike ephemeral type-A branches, those of type B persist and become long-lived, potentially permanent units of the architecture of Archaeopteris trees. Type-H adventitious traces are also short-lived and occur singly or in serial groups, but differ from traces of either type A or B branches by lacking differentiation into a readily identifiable organ category. We interpret type-H traces as supplying latent primordia that could develop into either adventitious roots or shoots depending on extrinsic factors. Our new data suggest that Archaeopteris had a wide range of branch primordium amplitude. Type-B branches compare with axillary lateral branch buds of some Early Carboniferous spermatophytes (Calamopitys) and are a major developmental departure from the strictly apical, pseudomonopodial shoot branching of older aneurophyte progymnosperms. Type-H traces suggest that Archaeopteris trees had some potential for formation of adventitious roots or shoots in response to environmental factors, such as partial burial by overbank sedimentation. Collectively, these novel methods of tree branching may partly explain the extraordinary success and worldwide dominance of Archaeopteris forests on fluvially dominated, Late Devonian floodplains.     

An architectural analysis of Archaeopteris9 a fossil tree with pseudomonopodial and opportunistic adventitious growth

Currently recognized hierarchies of lateral organs in Archaeopteris are presented and phenomena that mediate organography and organotaxis in the taxon are discussed. It is demonstrated that Archaeopteris is totally lacking extant architectural analogues, and the methodology employed in the architectural analysis of such fossil plants is introduced. Proposed growth categories or phases for the Archaeopteris plant are presented and tested against evidence from a large silicified log of Callixylon, the trunk of Archaeopteris. An architectural model is put forward that encompasses such growth phaseS. Finally, the occurrence of reiterative, opportunistic growth in Archaeopteris is discussed.