Host resistance in defoliated pine: effects of single and mass inoculations using bark beetle-associated blue-stain fungi

1 In 1996, 7000 ha of pine forests were defoliated by the pine looper Bupalus piniaria in south‐western Sweden. 2 The susceptibility of trees of different defoliation classes (0, 30, 60, 90 and 100% defoliation) to beetle‐vectored blue‐stain fungi was tested in inoculation experiments. Forty and 120‐year‐old Scots pine trees were inoculated with ‘single’, i.e. a few inoculations of Leptographium wingfieldii and Ophiostoma minus, two blue‐stain fungi associated with the pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda. The young trees were also ‘mass’ inoculated with L. wingfieldii at a density of 400 inoculation points per m² over a 60 cm stem belt. 3 Host tree symptoms indicated that only trees with 90–100% defoliation were susceptible to the mass inoculation. 4 Single inoculations did not result in any consistent differences in fungal performance between trees of different defoliation classes, regardless of inoculated species or tree age class. 5 Leptographium wingfieldii produced larger reaction zones than O. minus, and both species produced larger lesions in old than in young trees. 6 As beetle‐induced tree mortality in the study area occurred only in totally defoliated stands, mass inoculations seem to mimic beetle‐attacks fairly well, and thus seem to be a useful tool for assessing host resistance. 7 As even severely defoliated pine trees were quite resistant, host defence reactions in Scots pine seem to be less dependent on carbon allocation than predicted by carbon‐based defence hypotheses.     

Attack dynamics of the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Col.; Scolytinae) in Scots pine stands defoliated by Bupalus piniaria (Lep.; Geometridae)

Abstract 1 After a 1‐year, extensive pine looper (Bupalus piniaria) outbreak, plots were laid out to study tree susceptibility to attack, and performance of Tomicus piniperda in pine trees suffering from varying levels of defoliation. 2 Tomicus piniperda was the dominating stem‐attacking species among the primary stem colonizers, and 82% of all trees that died had been colonized by T. piniperda. 3 Beetle attacks primarily struck severely defoliated trees, i.e. trees that suffered from 90% to 100% defoliation. 4 Beetle attacks peaked in the second year after cessation of the outbreak, and suppressed trees were both more frequently attacked and more susceptible to beetle attack than intermediate and dominant trees. 5 Trees surviving beetle attacks carried more foliage than trees that did not survive the attacks. 6 A single year of severe defoliation is enough to render pine trees susceptible to secondary pests, such as T. piniperda.     

Effects of previous defoliation on pine looper larval performance

1 During outbreaks of the pine looper, Bupalus piniarius, its host, Pinus sylvestris, is severely defoliated. The larvae of this geometrid normally feed on mature needles. However, because trees are totally defoliated during outbreaks, the next generation is forced to feed on current-year needles. 2 Bupalus piniarius larvae feeding on previously defoliated trees may show lower performance either because of induced resistance or because larvae have to feed on needles not normally fed upon (current instead of mature). 3 These hypotheses were tested in an experiment where larvae were reared on (i) shoots naturally defoliated the previous year, and thus, bearing only current-year needles, (ii) non-defoliated shoots where larvae had access only to current-year needles, and (iii) control shoots with access to both current and mature needles. 4 There was no support for the induction hypothesis. Survival was lower on naturally defoliated shoots than on control shoots (81.3 vs. 90.9%), but survival was lower also on non-defoliated shoots where larvae had access only to current-year needles (78.8%). Data on larval feeding distribution showed a strong preference for mature needles. 5 Needle nitrogen concentration of current-year needles was 38% higher on defoliated trees than on non-defoliated trees. 6 It is concluded that defoliation affected larval performance primarily through the removal of the preferred type of needles and not because of an induced resistance. Effects of increased concentrations of allelochemicals in defoliated shoots, if present, were probably cancelled out by increased nitrogen concentrations.     

Performance of pine looper Bupalus piniarius larvae under population build-up conditions

In the first year of an outbreak, Bupalus piniarius larvae, encounter intense crowding. In the later stages of larval development, they are forced to feed on the non-preferred current-year needles of Scots pine or even on alternative hosts. It was hypothesized that larval feeding on a non-preferred resource (current-year needles) will negatively affect B. piniarius performance. It was also hypothesized that larval mutual interference (crowding without competition for food) will have negative additive effects. These hypotheses were tested in laboratory and field experiments. Fourth instar larvae were reared singly and under crowded conditions in cohorts of ten. Larvae in both situations were reared on control branches (containing both mature and current-year shoots) and branches containing only current-year shoots. Crowded larvae were reared also on Norway spruce, an alternative host. Crowding and feeding on a non-preferred resource had opposite effects on B. piniarius larval performance. Crowding in the late larval instars enhanced larval performance while absence of the preferred resource had negative effects. Larval growth rate was higher and development time was shorter for larvae exposed to crowded conditions than for solitary larvae. There was, however, no difference between the groups in final pupal weights or survival. Survival was 25% lower for larvae feeding on non-preferred current-year needles and pupal weights 9% lower, compared with results for larvae feeding on mature needles. Larvae feeding on Norway spruce suffered greatly extended development time, 82% lower survival, and resulted in 60% lighter pupae compared with conspecifics on Scots pine. It was concluded that not only quantity but also quality of the available food resource is critical for B. piniarius development.