首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   21篇
  免费   32篇
  2022年   1篇
  2018年   5篇
  2017年   9篇
  2016年   8篇
  2015年   10篇
  2014年   4篇
  2013年   13篇
  2012年   2篇
  2011年   1篇
排序方式: 共有53条查询结果,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
The principal problem arising from prostate cancer (PCa) is its propensity to metastasize to bones, and it's crucial to understand the mechanism of tumor progression to metastasis in order to develop therapies that may reduce the morbidity and mortality of PCa patients. Although we had identified that microRNA(miR)‐145 could repress bone metastasis of PCa via regulating epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in previous study, it is still unknown how miR‐145 regulated EMT. In the present study, we constructed a luciferase reporter system and identified HEF1 as a direct target of miR‐145. More importantly, HEF1 was shown to promote migration, invasion and EMT of PC‐3 cells, a human PCa cell line originated from a bone metastatic PCa specimen. And HEF1 was also shown to partially mediate miR‐145 suppression of EMT and invasion. Furthermore, inhibition of HEF1 repressed bone invasion of PC‐3 cells in vivo. Expression of HEF1 was negatively correlated with miR‐145 in primary PCa and bone metastatic specimens, but HEF1 was higher in samples which were more likely to commit to bone metastasis or those with higher free prostate‐specific antigen (fPSA) levels and Gleason scores. Taken together, these findings indicate that HEF1 promotes EMT and bone invasion in prostate cancer by directly targeted by miR‐145, and miR‐145 suppresses EMT and invasion, at least in part, through repressing HEF1. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1606–1615, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.  相似文献   
2.
3.
4.
Cytokines/chemokines are key players in cancer‐related inflammation. Increasing evidence suggests that chemokines produced by tumor cells are the mediators of metastasis. Thus, agents that can downregulate chemokines expression have potential against cancer metastasis. We have previously shown inhibition of ovarian and endometrial cancer cell growth with progesterone and calcitriol. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of these two agents on the expression of inflammatory genes. Using a RT‐PCR array of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and their receptors, we found a marked attenuation of CXCL1 and CXCL2 (GRO‐α and ‐β) in cancer cells by both treatments. Knockdown of NFκB resulted in a reduced expression of CXCL1 and CXCL2 and the inhibitory effect of progesterone and calcitriol on the expression of chemokines was abrogated in NFκB‐silenced cancer cells. Silencing of IκBα increased the expression of CXCL1 and CXCL2 in cancer cells, which can be attributed to the increased activation of NFκB‐p65, caused by the lack of its inhibitor. Progesterone and calcitriol‐induced inhibition was abolished in IκBα‐knockdown cells. Our results demonstrate that suppression of IκBα phosphorylation by progesterone and calcitriol contributes to the reduced expression of CXCL1 and CXCL2. Downregulation of CXCL1 and CXCL2 was associated with a marked inhibition of metastasis‐promoting genes. Overall, our results indicate that progesterone and calcitriol inhibit IκBα phosphorylation, NFκB activation, and the expression of NFκB regulated metastasis promoting genes. These results provide attractive data for the possible use of progesterone and calcitriol in the management of endometrial and ovarian tumors. J. Cell. Biochem. 113: 3143–3152, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.  相似文献   
5.
This study aimed to address the insufficiency of traditional meta‐analysis and provide improved guidelines for the clinical practice of osteosarcoma treatment. The heterogeneity of the fixed‐effect model was calculated, and when necessary, a random‐effect model was adopted. Furthermore, the direct and indirect evidence was pooled together and exhibited in the forest plot and slash table. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value was also measured to rank each intervention. Finally, heat plot was introduced to demonstrate the contribution of each intervention and the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons. This network meta‐analysis included 32 trials, involving a total of 5,626 subjects reported by 28 articles. All the treatments were classified into six chemotherapeutic combinations: dual agent with or without ifosfamide (IFO), multi‐agent with or without IFO, and dual agent or multi‐agent with IFO and etoposide. For the primary outcomes, both overall survival (OS) and event‐free survival (EFS) rates were considered. The multi‐agent integrated with IFO and etoposide showed an optimal performance for 5‐year OS, 10‐year OS, 3‐year EFS, 5‐year EFS, and 10‐year EFS when compared with placebo. The SUCRA value of this treatment was also the highest of these six interventions. However, multi‐drug with IFO alone had the highest SUCRA value of 0.652 and 0.516 when it came to relapse and lung‐metastasis. It was efficient to some extent, but no significant difference was observed in both outcomes. Chemotherapy, applied as induction or adjuvant treatment with radiation therapy or surgery, is able to increase the survival rate of patients, especially by combining multi‐drug with IFO and etoposide, which demonstrated the best performance in both OS and EFS. As for relapse and the lung‐metastasis, multiple agents with IFO alone seemed to have the optimal efficiency, although no significant difference was observed here. J. Cell. Biochem. 119: 250–259, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.  相似文献   
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
It is widely believed that host prion protein (PrP), without nucleic acid, converts itself into an infectious form (PrP‐res) that causes transmissible encephalopathies (TSEs), such as human sporadic CJD (sCJD), endemic sheep scrapie, and epidemic BSE. There are many detailed investigations of PrP, but proteomic studies of other proteins in verified infectious TSE particles have not been pursued, even though brain homogenates without PrP retain their complete infectious titer. To define proteins that may be integral to, process, or protect an agent genome, we developed a streamlined, high‐yield purification of infectious FU‐CJD mouse brain particles with minimal PrP. Proteinase K (PK) abolished all residual particle PrP, but did not reduce infectivity, and viral‐size particles lacking PrP were ~70S (vs. 90–120S without PK). Furthermore, over 1,500 non‐PrP proteins were still present and positively identified in high titer FU‐CJD particles without detectable PrP by mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS); 114 of these peptides were linked to viral motifs in the environmental–viral database, and not evident in parallel uninfected controls. Host components were also identified in both PK and non‐PK treated particles from FU‐CJD mouse brain and human sCJD brain. This abundant cellular data had several surprises, including finding Huntingtin in the sCJD but not normal human brain samples. Similarly, the neural Wiskott–Aldrich sequence and multivesicular and endosome components associated with retromer APP (Alzheimer amyloid) processing were only in sCJD. These cellular findings suggest that new therapies directed at retromer–vesicular trafficking in other neurodegenerative diseases may also counteract late‐onset sCJD PrP amyloid pathology. J. Cell. Biochem. 115: 2012–2021, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号