排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
An increasing number of software tools support designers and other decision makers in making design, production, and purchasing decisions. Some of these tools provide quantitative information on environmental impacts such as climate change, human toxicity, or resource use during the life cycle of these products. Very little is known, however, about how these tools are actually used, what kind of modeling and presentation approaches users really want, or whether the information provided is likely to be used the way the developers intended. A survey of users of one such software tool revealed that although users want more transparency, about half also want an easy-to-use tool and would accept built-in assumptions; that most users prefer modeling of environmental impacts beyond the stressor level, and the largest group of respondents wants results simultaneously on the stressor, impact potential, and damage level; and that although many users look for aggregated information on impacts and costs, a majority do not trust that such an aggregation is valid or believe that there are tradeoffs among impacts. Further, our results show that the temporal and spatial scales of single impact categories explain only about 6% of the variation in the weights between impact categories set by respondents if the weights are set first. If the weights are set after respondents specify temporal and spatial scales, however, these scales explain about 24% of the variation. These results not only help method and tool developers to reconsider some previous assumptions, but also suggest a number of research questions that may need to be addressed in a more focused investigation. 相似文献
2.
Using BEES to select cost-effective green products 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Barbara C. Lippiatt Amy S. Boyles 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2001,6(2):76-80
The BEES (Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability) software brings to your fingertips a powerful technique
for balancing the environmental and economic performance of building products. The tool is based on consensus standards and
designed to be practical, flexible, and transparent. Version 2.0 of the Windows™-based decision support software, aimed at
designers, builders, and product manufacturers, includes actual environmental and economic performance data for 65 building
products. The purpose is to support purchasing decisions by providing key science-based information often lacking in ‘green’
product selection. The intended result is a cost-effective reduction in building-related contributions to environmental problems.
Contribution of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and not subject to copyright in the United States.
NIST does not endorse any particular brand, product, or service. 相似文献
1