Cypris larvae of acrothoracican barnacles (Thecostraca: Cirripedia: Acrothoracica)

We used SEM to investigate the morphology of the cypris larvae from a range of species of the Cirripedia Acrothoracica, representing all three families and including the first detailed account of cyprids in the highly specialized Cryptophialidae. Special attention was given to the head shield (carapace), the lattice organs, the antennules, the thoracopods, the telson and the furcal rami. The cypris larvae of the Acrothoracica fall into two morphological groups; those of the Trypetesidae and Lithoglyptidae have a well-developed carapace (head shield) that can completely enclose the body and sports fronto-lateral pores, numerous short setae and lattice organs perforated by numerous small, rounded pores and a single, conspicuous terminal pore. The fourth antennular segment has the setae arranged in subterminal and terminal groups. There is a developed thorax with natatory thoracopods and a distinct abdomen and telson. In comparison, the cyprids of the Cryptophialidae exhibit apomorphies in the morphology of the carapace, the antennules and the thorax, mostly in the form of simplifications and reductions. They have a much smaller head shield, leaving parts of the body directly exposed. The shield is conspicuously ornamented by deep pits and hexagonally arranged ridges and bears a few, very long setae but lacks fronto-lateral pores. The lattice organs have numerous elongated pores, but no large, terminal pore. The fourth antennular segment has all the setae clustered in one terminal group. The thorax and thoracopods are rudimentary and not suitable for swimming. These reductions and simplifications in morphology correlate with cryptophialid cyprids being unable to swim. They can only disperse by antennular walking resulting in small, but highly gregarious populations of adults. The variations in antennular morphology and telson structure were traced for the genera of the families Lithoglyptidae and Trypetesidae. The traditional non-cladistic taxonomy in the suborders Pygophora (Cryptophialidae+Lithoglyptidae) and Apygophora (Trypetesidae) was based largely on symplesiomorphies in adult morphology and cannot be upheld. The Lithoglyptidae and Trypetesidae may form a monophylum, but evidence remains scarce. We expect that the use of larval (cyprid) characters will in the future play an important part in more detailed phylogenetic analyses of the Acrothoracica and also shed new light on their reproductive ecology.     

External morphology of the burrowing barnacle shape Lithoglyptes bicornis (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Acrothoracica)

The external morphology of female and male Lithoglyptes bicornis was examined under SEM. The structure of the mantle, the thorax and, especially, the trophi were thoroughly examined. The data on the mantle and the thorax structures were compared with the previous data on the acrothoracican ultrastructure. The data on the structure and the character of trophi setation allow to speculate about a relationship with other cirripede taxa.     

Male parasitism and intrasexual competition in a burrowing barnacle

Summary In sexually dimorphic animals, large male body size is often associated with direct interference competition among males for access to females or resources used in reproduction. In constrast, small male body size may be associated with indirect scramble competition among males for temporal or spatial access to females. Minute, “parasitic” males of the acrothoracican barnacleTrypetesa lampas (Hancock) appear to compete with one another for permanent attachment sites on the external body of the female. Several spatial patterns suggest indirect male-male competition: 1) males were consistently aggregated on the anterior surface of the female ovarian disc; 2) the average distance from attached males to the site of insemination correlated positively with local male density; 3) average male body size on a female decreased as a function of male density; 4) the distribution of males on the left and right hand sides of the female ovarian disc was more even than expected, suggesting that males avoided crowded settlement sites. The number of males attached to a female increased with female body size and matched a null model in which males colonized female “targets” of differing areas. These results suggest that competition between males primarily affected settlement sites and male body sizes within, rather than among, females. Male parasitism may have evolved through both sexual selection for efficient access to females (Ghiselin 1974) and natural selection for reduced burrow density in a space-limited habitat (Turner and Yakovlev 1983).