An immune response profile model for immunogenicity quantitation

We propose an analytical model, which can simultaneously depict many fundamental characteristics of the immunogenicity of various vaccines. This model, the Immune Response (IR) profile, conveniently expresses the mathematical relation between pre- and post-vaccination titers. A vaccine's IR profile is antigen-specific, dose-dependent and post-vaccination interval-dependent. The maximal capability for serological response to a vaccine can be determined using this model irrespective of the dose administered, the post-vaccination assay interval, or the live or killed state of the vaccine. The IR profile obtained from analysis of booster vaccine responses in a limited number of seropositive study subjects can be used to predict maximal antibody titers which are expected after vaccination and can predict the geometric mean post-vaccination antibody titer of a cohort of subjects undergoing primary immunization. Using this model, it is anticipated that the immunoregulation implied by the IR profile may also prove to be correlated with cellular subpopulations and idiotypic antibody functions. Although derived from influenza vaccines analyses, the model successfully describes immune response characteristics following natural infection with malaria and following diphtheria and rubella vaccine administration.     

Inhibition of adenosine deaminase leads to enhanced antibody responses in the mouse

Inhibition of adenosine deaminase activity leads to decreased cellular immunity. The effect of deoxycoformycin (DCF), a potent inhibitor of adenosine deaminase, on the ability of mouse spleen cells to generate antibody responses in vitro has been examined. With either continuous exposure to or pretreatment of the cells with deoxycoformycin, there was a decrease in cell survival and an increase in antibody-producing cells in the surviving cell population. To identify the cell population most susceptible to the inhibitor, the spleen was separated into B-cell, and T-cell, and macrophage components and each population was pretreated with deoxycoformycin before combination with its complementary treated or untreated population. Deoxycoformycin pretreatment had no effect on macrophages or B cells; however, pretreatment of the T cells resulted in increased antibody responses. When T cells and B cells were both pretreated and combined, there was a synergistic increase in the antibody response. In addition, supernatants from cultures in which both B cells and T cells had been pretreated with DCF were capable of enhancing antibody responses in cultures containing DCF-treated T cells. Though adenosine was increased in the stimulatory culture supernatants, adenosine alone did not enhance antibody responses in either untreated or DCF-treated cultures.