Optimization of lactic acid production by immobilized <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lactococcus lactis</Emphasis> IO-1

Production of lactic acid from glucose by immobilized cells of Lactococcus lactis IO-1 was investigated using cells that had been immobilized by either entrapment in beads of alginate or encapsulation in microcapsules of alginate membrane. The fermentation process was optimized in shake flasks using the Taguchi method and then further assessed in a production bioreactor. The bioreactor consisted of a packed bed of immobilized cells and its operation involved recycling of the broth through the bed. Both batch and continuous modes of operation of the reactor were investigated. Microencapsulation proved to be the better method of immobilization. For microencapsulated cells at immobilized cell concentration of 5.3 g l⁻¹, the optimal production medium had the following initial concentrations of nutrients (g l⁻¹): glucose 45, yeast extract 10, beef extract 10, peptone 7.5 and calcium chloride 10 at an initial pH of 6.85. Under these conditions, at 37 °C, the volumetric productivity of lactic acid in shake flasks was 1.8 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹. Use of a packed bed of encapsulated cells with recycle of the broth through the bed, increased the volumetric productivity to 4.5 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹. The packed bed could be used in repeated batch runs to produce lactic acid.     

A model of xylitol production by the yeast Candida mogii

Production of xylitol from xylose in batch fermentations of Candida mogii ATCC 18364 is discussed in the presence of glucose as the cosubstrate. Various initial ratios of glucose and xylose concentrations are assessed for their impact on yield and rate of production of xylitol. Supplementation with glucose at the beginning of the fermentation increased the specific growth rate, biomass yield and volumetric productivity of xylitol compared with fermentation that used xylose as the sole carbon source. A mathematical model is developed for eventual use in predicting the product formation rate and yield. The model parameters were estimated from experimental observations, using a genetic algorithm. Batch fermentations, which were carried out with xylose alone and a mixture of xylose and glucose, were used to validate the model. The model fitted well with the experimental data of cell growth, substrate consumption and xylitol production.     

Production of carotenoids and lipids by <Emphasis Type="Italic">Rhodococcus opacus</Emphasis> PD630 in batch and fed-batch culture

Production of carotenoids by Rhodococcus opacus PD630 is reported. A modified mineral salt medium formulated with glycerol as an inexpensive carbon source was used for the fermentation. Ammonium acetate was the nitrogen source. A dry cell mass concentration of nearly 5.4 g/L could be produced in shake flasks with a carotenoid concentration of 0.54 mg/L. In batch culture in a 5 L bioreactor, without pH control, the maximum dry biomass concentration was ~30 % lower than in shake flasks and the carotenoids concentration was 0.09 mg/L. Both the biomass concentration and the carotenoids concentration could be raised using a fed-batch operation with a feed mixture of ammonium acetate and acetic acid. With this strategy, the final biomass concentration was 8.2 g/L and the carotenoids concentration was 0.20 mg/L in a 10-day fermentation. A control of pH proved to be unnecessary for maximizing the production of carotenoids in this fermentation.     

Production of <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">l</Emphasis>-phenylalanine from glycerol by a recombinant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>

The production of l-phenylalanine is conventionally carried out by fermentations that use glucose or sucrose as the carbon source. This work reports on the use of glycerol as an inexpensive and abundant sole carbon source for producing l-phenylalanine using the genetically modified bacterium Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). Fermentations were carried out at 37°C, pH 7.4, using a defined medium in a stirred tank bioreactor at various intensities of impeller agitation speeds (300–500 rpm corresponding to 0.97–1.62 m s⁻¹ impeller tip speed) and aeration rates (2–8 L min⁻¹, or 1–4 vvm). This highly aerobic fermentation required a good supply of oxygen, but intense agitation (impeller tip speed ~1.62 m s⁻¹) reduced the biomass and l-phenylalanine productivity, possibly because of shear sensitivity of the recombinant bacterium. Production of l-phenylalanine was apparently strongly associated with growth. Under the best operating conditions (1.30 m s⁻¹ impeller tip speed, 4 vvm aeration rate), the yield of l-phenylalanine on glycerol was 0.58 g g⁻¹, or more than twice the best yield attainable on sucrose (0.25 g g⁻¹). In the best case, the peak concentration of l-phenylalanine was 5.6 g L⁻¹, or comparable to values attained in batch fermentations that use glucose or sucrose. The use of glycerol for the commercial production of l-phenylalanine with E. coli BL21(DE3) has the potential to substantially reduce the cost of production compared to sucrose- and glucose-based fermentations.     

Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations

Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae NP01 was investigated under very high gravity (VHG) fermentation and various carbon adjuncts and nitrogen sources. When sucrose was used as an adjunct, the sweet sorghum juice containing total sugar of 280 g l⁻¹, 3 g yeast extract l⁻¹ and 5 g peptone l⁻¹ gave the maximum ethanol production efficiency with concentration, productivity and yield of 120.68 ± 0.54 g l⁻¹, 2.01 ± 0.01 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹ and 0.51 ± 0.00 g g⁻¹, respectively. When sugarcane molasses was used as an adjunct, the juice under the same conditions gave the maximum ethanol concentration, productivity and yield with the values of 109.34 ± 0.78 g l⁻¹, 1.52 ± 0.01 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹ and 0.45 ± 0.01 g g⁻¹, respectively. In addition, ammonium sulphate was not suitable for use as a nitrogen supplement in the sweet sorghum juice for ethanol production since it caused the reduction in ethanol concentration and yield for approximately 14% when compared to those of the unsupplemented juices.     

Cellulosic ethanol production: Progress,challenges and strategies for solutions

Lignocellulosic biomass is a sustainable feedstock for fuel ethanol production, but it is characterized by low mass and energy densities, and distributed production with relatively small scales is more suitable for cellulosic ethanol, which can better balance cost for the feedstock logistics. Lignocellulosic biomass is recalcitrant to degradation, and pretreatment is needed, but more efficient pretreatment technologies should be developed based on an in-depth understanding of its biosynthesis and regulation for engineering plant cell walls with less recalcitrance. Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation has been developed for cellulosic ethanol production, but the concept has been mistakenly defined, since the saccharification and co-fermentation are by no means simultaneous. Lignin is unreactive, which not only occupies reactor spaces during the enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose component and ethanol fermentation thereafter, but also requires extra mixing, making high solid loading difficult for lignocellulosic biomass and ethanol titers substantially compromised, which consequently increases energy consumption for ethanol distillation and stillage discharge, presenting another challenge for cellulosic ethanol production. Pentose sugars released from the hydrolysis of hemicelluloses are not fermentable with Saccharomyces cerevisiae used for ethanol production from sugar- and starch-based feedstocks, and engineering the brewing yeast and other ethanologenic species such as Zymomonas mobilis with pentose metabolism has been performed within the past decades. However strategies for the simultaneous co-fermentation of pentose and hexose sugars that have been pursued overwhelmingly for strain development might be modified for robust ethanol production. Finally, unit integration and system optimization are needed to maximize economic and environmental benefits for cellulosic ethanol production. In this article, we critically reviewed updated progress, and highlighted challenges and strategies for solutions.     

Production of fructose from inulin using mixed inulinases from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aspergillus niger</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida guilliermondii</Emphasis>

Two new effective microbial producers of inulinases were isolated from Jerusalem artichoke tubers grown in Thailand and identified as Aspergillus niger TISTR 3570 and Candida guilliermondii TISTR 5844. The inulinases produced by both these microorganisms were appropriate for hydrolysing inulin to fructose as the principal product. An initial inulin concentration of ∼100 g l⁻¹ and the enzyme concentration of 0.2 U g⁻¹ of substrate, yielded 37.5 g l⁻¹ of fructose in 20 h at 40°C when A. niger TISTR 3570 inulinase was the biocatalyst. The yield of fructose on inulin was 0.39 g g⁻¹. Under identical conditions, the yeast inulinase afforded 35.3 g l⁻¹ of fructose in 25 h. The fructose yield was 0.35 g g⁻¹ of substrate. The fructose productivities were 1.9 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹ and 1.4 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹ for the mold and yeast enzymes, respectively. After 20 h of reaction, the mold enzyme hydrolysate contained 53% fructose and more than 41% of initial inulin had been hydrolysed. Using the yeast enzymes, the hydrolysate contained nearly 38% fructose at 25 h and nearly 36% of initial inulin had been hydrolysed. The A. niger TISTR 3570 inulinases exhibited both endo-inulinase and exo-inulinase activities. In contrast, the yeast inulinases displayed mainly exo-inulinase activity. The mold and yeast crude inulinases mixed in the activity ratio of 5:1 proved superior to individual crude inulinases in hydrolysing inulin to fructose. The enzyme mixture provided a better combination of endo- and exo-inulinase activities than did the crude extracts of either the mold or the yeast individually.