Interfamily Transfer of Dual NB-LRR Genes Confers Resistance to Multiple Pathogens

A major class of disease resistance (R) genes which encode nucleotide binding and leucine rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins have been used in traditional breeding programs for crop protection. However, it has been difficult to functionally transfer NB-LRR-type R genes in taxonomically distinct families. Here we demonstrate that a pair of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae) NB-LRR-type R genes, RPS4 and RRS1, properly function in two other Brassicaceae, Brassica rapa and Brassica napus, but also in two Solanaceae, Nicotiana benthamiana and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). The solanaceous plants transformed with RPS4/RRS1 confer bacterial effector-specific immunity responses. Furthermore, RPS4 and RRS1, which confer resistance to a fungal pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum in Brassicaceae, also protect against Colletotrichum orbiculare in cucumber (Cucurbitaceae). Importantly, RPS4/RRS1 transgenic plants show no autoimmune phenotypes, indicating that the NB-LRR proteins are tightly regulated. The successful transfer of two R genes at the family level implies that the downstream components of R genes are highly conserved. The functional interfamily transfer of R genes can be a powerful strategy for providing resistance to a broad range of pathogens.     

The cDNA microarray analysis using an Arabidopsis pad3 mutant reveals the expression profiles and classification of genes induced by Alternaria brassicicola attack

The hypersensitive response (HR) was induced in a wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana plant (Columbia) (Col-wt) by inoculation with Alternaria brassicicola that causes the development of small brown necrotic lesions on the leaves. By contrast, pad3-1 mutants challenged with A. brassicicola produced spreading lesions. The cell death in pad3-1 mutants could not inhibit the pathogen growth and development, although both production of H(2)O(2) and localized cell death were similar in Col-wt and pad3-1 plants after the inoculation. The difference between Col-wt and pad3-1 plants is defense responses after the occurrence of cell death. In other words, PAD3 is necessary for defense response to A. brassicicola. Therefore, we examined the changes in the expression patterns of ca. 7,000 genes by cDNA microarray analysis after inoculation with A. brassicicola. The cDNA microarrays were also done to analyze Arabidopsis responses after treatment with signal molecules, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-inducing compounds and UV-C. The results suggested that the pad3-1 mutation altered not only the accumulation of camalexin but also the timing of expression of many defense-related genes in response to the challenge with A. brassicicola. Furthermore, the plants integrate two or more signals that act together for promoting the induction of multiple defense pathways.     

Two different novel cis-acting elements of erd1, a clpA homologous Arabidopsis gene function in induction by dehydration stress and dark-induced senescence

Many plant genes have been shown to be induced by water stress and function in stress tolerance. The erd1 gene has been shown to be upregulated in response to both water stress and etiolation. Promoter studies using the erd1 promoter region fused to the luciferase (LUC) reporter gene in Arabidopsis thaliana were performed to identify the putative cis elements involved. Results indicated that the cis elements, responsible for gene expression during dehydration and etiolation, are separately located in two discrete portions of the erd1 promoter. Base substitution analysis showed that a 14-bp region from -599 to -586, and a myc recognition motif from -466 to -461 are necessary for the induction of LUC activity in dehydrated plants. On the other hand, base substitution analysis revealed that both an abscisic acid responsive element (ABRE)-like sequence (from -199 to -195) and an ACGT sequence (from -155 to -152) are required for an etiolation-induced increase in LUC activity. LUC activity measurements from etiolated transgenic plants incubated in either water, N6-benzyleadenine (BA), or a 1% sucrose solution found that while BA was able to delay the increase in LUC activity seen in water-treated plants, no increase in LUC activity was seen in plants incubated in sucrose. These results indicate that the erd1 promoter contains two different regulatory systems that are involved in upregulation by dehydration stress and dark-induced senescence.     

Yeast Cell Wall Extract Induces Disease Resistance against Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica Crop

Housaku Monogatari (HM) is a plant activator prepared from a yeast cell wall extract. We examined the efficacy of HM application and observed that HM treatment increased the resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa leaves to bacterial and fungal infections. HM reduced the severity of bacterial leaf spot and anthracnose on A. thaliana and Brassica crop leaves with protective effects. In addition, gene expression analysis of A. thaliana plants after treatment with HM indicated increased expression of several plant defense-related genes. HM treatment appears to induce early activation of jasmonate/ethylene and late activation of salicylic acid (SA) pathways. Analysis using signaling mutants revealed that HM required SA accumulation and SA signaling to facilitate resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola and the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. In addition, HM-induced resistance conferred chitin-independent disease resistance to bacterial pathogens in A. thaliana. These results suggest that HM contains multiple microbe-associated molecular patterns that activate defense responses in plants. These findings suggest that the application of HM is a useful tool that may facilitate new disease control methods.     

Comparison of local and systemic induction of acquired disease resistance in cucumber plants treated with benzothiadiazoles or salicylic acid.

The accumulation of chitinase and its involvement in systemic acquired disease resistance was analyzed using acibenzolar-S-methyl and salicylic acid (SA). Resistance against scab (pathogen: Cladosporium cucumerinum) and the accumulation of chitinase were rapidly induced in cucumber plants after treatment with acibenzolar-S-methyl. In contrast, SA protected the plants from C. cucumerinum and the accumulation of chitinase was induced only on the treated leaves. The accumulation of chitinase in response to inoculation with the pathogen was induced more rapidly in cucumber plants previously treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl than in plants pretreated with SA or water. Thus, it appears that a prospective signal(s), that induces systemic resistance, can be transferred from leaves treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl to the untreated upper and lower leaves where systemic resistance is elicited. In contrast, exogenously applied SA is not likely to function as a mobile, systemic resistance-inducing signal, because SA only induces localized acquired resistance.     

In vitro random mutagenesis of the D1 protein of the photosystem II reaction center confers phototolerance on the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

The D1 protein of the photosystem II reaction center is thought to be the most light-sensitive component of the photosynthetic machinery. To understand the mechanisms underlying the light sensitivity of D1, we performed in vitro random mutagenesis of the psbA gene that codes for D1, transformed the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 with mutated psbA, and selected phototolerant transformants that did not bleach in high intensity light. A region of psbA2 coding for 178 amino acids of the carboxyl-terminal portion of the peptide was subjected to random mutagenesis by low fidelity polymerase chain reaction amplification or by hydroxylamine treatment. This region contains the binding sites for Q(B), D2 (through Fe), and P680. Eighteen phototolerant mutants with single and multiple amino acid substitutions were selected from a half million transformants exposed to white light at 320 micromol m(-2) s(-1). A strain transformed with non-mutagenized psbA2 became bleached under the same conditions. Site-directed mutagenesis has confirmed that one or more substitutions of amino acids at residues 234, 254, 260, 267, 322, 326, and 328 confers phototolerance. The rate of degradation of D1 protein was not appreciably affected by the mutations. Reduced bleaching of mutant cyanobacterial cells may result from continued buildup of photosynthetic pigment systems caused by changes in redox signals originating from D1.     

Jasmonate-dependent plant defense restricts thrips performance and preference

Background  

The western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis [Pergande]) is one of the most important insect herbivores of cultivated plants. However, no pesticide provides complete control of this species, and insecticide resistance has emerged around the world. We previously reported the important role of jasmonate (JA) in the plant's immediate response to thrips feeding by using an Arabidopsis leaf disc system. In this study, as the first step toward practical use of JA in thrips control, we analyzed the effect of JA-regulated Arabidopsis defense at the whole plant level on thrips behavior and life cycle at the population level over an extended period. We also studied the effectiveness of JA-regulated plant defense on thrips damage in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis).     

A dual resistance gene system prevents infection by three distinct pathogens

Colletotrichum higginsianum causes typical anthracnose lesions on the leaves, petioles, and stems of cruciferous plants. Inoculation of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia leaves with C. higginsianum results in fungal growth and disease symptoms reminiscent of those induced in other cruciferous plants. We performed map-based cloning and natural variation analysis of 19 A. thaliana ecotypes to identify a dominant resistance locus against C. higginsianum. We found that the A. thaliana RCH2 (for recognition of C. higginsianum) locus encodes two NB-LRR proteins, both of which are required for resistance to C. higginsianum in the A. thaliana ecotype Ws-0. Both proteins are well-characterized R proteins involved in resistance against bacterial pathogens; RRS1 (resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum 1) confers resistance to strain Rs1000 of R. solanacearum and RPS4 to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 expressing avrRps4 (Pst-avrRps4). Furthermore, we found that both RRS1-Ws and RPS4-Ws genes are required for resistance to Pst-avrRps4 and to Rs1002 R. solanacearum. We therefore demonstrate that a pair of neighboring genes, RRS1-Ws and RPS4-Ws, function cooperatively as a dual R-gene system against at least three distinct pathogens.Key words: R gene, RPS4, RRS1, Colletotrichum higginsianum, Pseudomonas syringae, Ralstonia solanacearumPlants are exposed to various types of potentially invasive organisms, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, nematodes and protozoa, but are able to defend themselves by activating multiple defense mechanisms. The gene-for-gene hypothesis¹ provides a mechanism for specific recognition of the pathogen by the plant. This recognition is mediated by direct or indirect interactions between the product of a plant resistance (R) gene and the corresponding effectors encoded by avirulence genes in the pathogen.² Most R-genes encode non-membrane proteins that contain a conserved nucleotide-binding (NB) site and a carboxy-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain.The A. thaliana genome contains about 150 genes coding for NB-LRR-containing proteins.³ This is far less than the number of genes that would be required to respond individually and specifically to all of its potential pathogens. However, plants may have been able to limit the number of required NB-LRR-encoding genes if host proteins perceive sets of distinct pathogens.⁴Colletotrichum species cause devastating anthracnose diseases in a large number of agronomically important crops. These diseases can often be controlled by introduction of genetic resistance traits, but the molecular components of resistance remain unknown. Inoculation of A. thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) leaves with Colletotrichum higginsianum results in fungal growth and disease symptoms reminiscent of those induced in other cruciferous plants.^5,6 Inoculation of a large number of ecotypes with isolates of C. higginsianum showed that A. thaliana has at least two dominant resistance gene loci, designated RCH1 and RCH2 (for recognition of C. higginsianum), indicating that A. thaliana resistance to C. higginsianum is controlled by a “gene-for-gene” interaction.⁵ In a previous study, we identified a single putative R locus, RCH1 on the top of chromosome 4, in the C. higginsianum-resistant A. thaliana ecotype Eil-0.⁵In the present study, the locus named RCH2 maps in an extensive cluster of disease-resistance loci known as MRC-J in the A. thaliana ecotype Ws-0. By analyzing natural variations within the MRC-J region, we found that alleles of RRS1 (resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum 1) from susceptible ecotypes contain single nucleotide polymorphisms that may affect the encoded protein. Consistent with this finding, two susceptible mutants, rrs1-1 and rrs1–2, were identified by screening a T-DNA-tagged mutant library for the loss of resistance to C. higginsianum. The screening identified an additional susceptible mutant (rps4-21), which has a 5-bp deletion in the neighboring gene, RPS4-Ws, a well-characterized R gene that provides resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 expressing avrRps4 (Pst-avrRps4). To assess if RRS1-Ws and RPS4-Ws function in concert, we generated an rps4-21/rrs1-1 double mutant by crossing rps4-21 and rrs1-1 mutants. The susceptibility levels of rps4-21/rrs1-1 double mutant to C. higginsianum were similar to that exhibited by the single mutants, suggesting that RRS1-Ws and RPS-4-Ws function cooperatively. We also found that both RRS1 and RPS4 are required for resistance to R. solanacearum and Pst-avrRps4. Thus, these two adjacent R genes confer resistance, in tandem or individually, to three distinct pathogens with very different infection strategies and virulence mechanisms (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1RPS4 and RRS1 function as a dual resistance gene system that prevents infection by three distinct pathogens (Colletotrichum higginsianum, Ralstonia solanacearum and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 expressing avrRps4).Several examples of two NB-LRR genes acting cooperatively to confer resistance against a pathogen have been reported. For example, A. thaliana RPP2A and RPP2B reside adjacently in the RPP2 locus.⁷ Blast resistance in Pikm-containing rice is conferred by a combination of two NB-LRR encoding genes, Pikm1-TS and Pikm2-TS.⁸ Pi5-mediated resistance against rice blast requires two NB-LRR-encoding genes.⁹ It is not known whether these NB-LRR genes function cooperatively or independently. Because of structural similarity with RRS1/RPS4 genes, it is possible that resistance to the pathogens is conferred by cooperation between the two NB-LRR genes.Several reports have shown that a single R gene/locus can confer resistance to multiple pathogens. For instance, tomato Mi mediates resistance against three distinct types of pests, including root-knot nematodes, potato aphids and sweet potato whitefly.¹⁰ In the present study, we suggest that two distinct R-genes located in a conserved head-to-head organization confer resistance to three distinct pathogen species by acting cooperatively.The tandem function of RRS1-Ws and its neighboring gene RPS4-Ws is also supported by the evolutionary conservation of the gene pair. Close homologs of RPS4 are often physically paired with homologs of RRS1 in a head-to-head (inverted) tandem arrangement.¹¹ The evolutionary conservation of homologous gene pairs in a head-to-head arrangement also supports the idea that cooperative function of two R genes could be a common mechanism of defense against pathogens. Since the two open reading frames are only 264 bp apart, the promoter regions of the gene pairs possibly overlap, leading to co-regulation of the genes. The head-to-head configuration may assure balanced levels of the protein pair to meet a strict stoichiometric requirement to act together, possibly in a complex. As a practical application, this finding may provide a new strategy for creating transgenic plants that express R genes from other plants. Introduction of two R genes in a head-to-head orientation may be necessary for effective pathogen resistance.     

A locus conferring resistance to Colletotrichum higginsianum is shared by four geographically distinct Arabidopsis accessions

Colletotrichum higginsianum is a hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen that causes anthracnose disease on Arabidopsis and other crucifer hosts. By exploiting natural variation in Arabidopsis we identified a resistance locus that is shared by four geographically distinct accessions (Ws‐0, Kondara, Gifu‐2 and Can‐0). A combination of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and Mendelian mapping positioned this locus within the major recognition gene complex MRC‐J on chromosome 5 containing the Toll‐interleukin‐1 receptor/nucleotide‐binding site/leucine‐rich repeat (TIR‐NB‐LRR) genes RPS4 and RRS1 that confer dual resistance to C. higginsianum in Ws‐0 ( Narusaka et al., 2009 ). We find that the resistance shared by these diverse Arabidopsis accessions is expressed at an early stage of fungal invasion, at the level of appressorial penetration and establishment of intracellular biotrophic hyphae, and that this determines disease progression. Resistance is not associated with host hypersensitive cell death, an oxidative burst or callose deposition in epidermal cells but requires the defense regulator EDS1, highlighting new functions of TIR‐NB‐LRR genes and EDS1 in limiting early establishment of fungal biotrophy. While the Arabidopsis accession Ler‐0 is fully susceptible to C. higginsianum infection, Col‐0 displays intermediate resistance that also maps to MRC‐J. By analysis of null mutants of RPS4 and RRS1 in Col‐0 we show that these genes, individually, do not contribute strongly to C. higginsianum resistance but are both required for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria expressing the Type III effector, AvrRps4. We conclude that distinct allelic forms of RPS4 and RRS1 probably cooperate to confer resistance to different pathogens.