Ischaemic preconditioning in the rat brain: effect on the activity of several initiation factors, Akt and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase phosphorylation, and GRP78 and GADD34 expression

Translational repression induced during reperfusion of the ischaemic brain is significantly attenuated by ischaemic preconditioning. The present work was undertaken to identify the components of the translational machinery involved and to determine whether translational attenuation selectively modifies protein expression patterns during reperfusion. Wistar rats were preconditioned by 5-min sublethal ischaemia and 2 days later, 30-min lethal ischaemia was induced. Several parameters were studied after lethal ischaemia and reperfusion in rats with and without acquired ischaemic tolerance (IT). The phosphorylation pattern of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) in rats with IT was exactly the same as in rats without IT, reaching a peak after 30 min reperfusion and returning to control values within 4 h in both the cortex and hippocampus. The levels of phosphorylated eIF4E-binding protein after lethal ischaemia and eIF4E at 30 min reperfusion were higher in rats with IT, notably in the hippocampus. eIF4G levels diminished slightly after ischaemia and reperfusion, paralleling calpain-mediated alpha-spectrin proteolysis in rats with and without IT, but they did not show any further decrease after 30 min reperfusion in rats with IT. The phosphorylated levels of eIF4G, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein B (Akt) and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) were very low after lethal ischaemia and increased following reperfusion. Ischaemic preconditioning did not modify the observed changes in eIF4G phosphorylation. All these results support that translation attenuation may occur through multiple targets. The levels of the glucose-regulated protein (78 kDa) remained unchanged in rats with and without IT. Conversely, our data establish a novel finding that ischaemia induces strong translation of growth arrest and DNA damage protein 34 (GADD34) after 4 h of reperfusion. GADD34 protein was slightly up-regulated after preconditioning, besides, as in rats without IT, GADD34 levels underwent a further clear-cut increase during reperfusion, this time as earlier as 30 min and coincident with translation attenuation.     

Delayed Postconditionig Initiates Additive Mechanism Necessary for Survival of Selectively Vulnerable Neurons After Transient Ischemia in Rat Brain

1. The aim of this study was to validate the role of postconditioning, used 2 days after lethal ischemia, for protection of selectively vulnerable brain neurons against delayed neuronal death.2. Eight, 10, or 15 min of transient forebrain ischemia in rat (four-vessel occlusion model) was used as initial lethal ischemia. Fluoro Jade B, the marker of neurodegeneration, and NeuN, a specific neuronal marker were used for visualization of changes 7 or 28 days after ischemia without and with delayed postconditioning.3. Our results confirm that postconditioning if used at right time and with optimal intensity can prevent process of delayed neuronal death. At least three techniques, known as preconditioners, can be used as postconditioning: short ischemia, 3-nitropropionic acid and norepinephrine. A cardinal role for the prevention of death in selectively vulnerable neurons comprises synthesis of proteins during the first 5 h after postconditioning. Ten minutes of ischemia alone is lethal for 70% of pyramidal CA1 neurons in hippocampus. Injection of inhibitor of protein synthesis (Cycloheximide), if administered simultaneously with postconditioning, suppressed beneficial effect of postconditioning and resulted in 50% of CA1 neurons succumbing to neurodegeneration. Although, when Cycloheximide was injected 5 h after postconditioning, this treatment resulted in survival of 90% of CA1 neurons.4. Though postconditioning significantly protects hippocampal CA1 neurons up to 10 min of ischemia, its efficacy at 15 min ischemia is exhausted. However, protective impact of postconditioning in less-sensitive neuronal populations (cortex and striatum) is very good after such a damaging insult like 15 min ischemia. This statement also means that up to 15 min of ischemia, postconditioning does not induce cumulation of injuries produced by the first and the second stress.     

Role of Protein Synthesis in the Ischemic Tolerance Acquisition Induced by Transient Forebrain Ischemia in the Rat

Although ischemic preconditioning of the heart and brain is a well-documented neuroprotective phenomenon, the mechanism underlying the increased resistance to severe ischemia induced by a preceding mild ischemic exposure remains unclear. In this study we have determined the effect of ischemic preconditioning on ischemia/reperfusion-associated translation inhibition in the neocortex and hippocampus of the rat. We studied the effect of the duration on the sublethal ischemic episode (3, 4, 5 or 8 min), as well as the amount of time elapsed between sublethal and lethal ischemia on the cell death 7 days after the last ischemic episode. In addition, the rate of protein synthesis in vitro and expression of the 72-kD heat shock protein (hsp) were determined under the different experimental conditions. Our results suggest that two different mechanisms are essential for the acquisition of ischemic tolerance, at least in the CA1 sector of hippocampus. The first mechanism implies a highly significant reduction in translation inhibition after lethal ischemia, especially at an early time of reperfusion, in both vulnerable and nonvulnerable neurons. For the acquisition of full tolerance, a second mechanism, highly dependent on the time interval between preconditioning (sublethal ischemia) and lethal ischemia, is absolutely necessary; this second mechanism involves synthesis of protective proteins, which prevent the delayed death of vulnerable neurons.     

Evidence for a Role of Second Pathophysiological Stress in Prevention of Delayed Neuronal Death in the Hippocampal CA1 Region

In ischemic tolerance experiment, when we applied 5-min ischemia 2 days before 30-min ischemia, we achieved a remarkable (95.8%) survival of CA1 neurons. However, when we applied 5-min ischemia itself, without following lethal ischemia, we found out 45.8% degeneration of neurons in the CA1. This means that salvage of 40% CA1 neurons from postischemic degeneration was initiated by the second pathophysiological stress. These findings encouraged us to hypothesize that the second pathophysiological stress used 48 h after lethal ischemia can be efficient in prevention of delayed neuronal death. Our results demonstrate that whereas 8 min of lethal ischemia destroys 49.9% of CAI neurons, 10 min of ischemia destroys 71.6% of CA1 neurons, three different techniques of the second pathophysiological stress are able to protect against both: CA1 damage as well as spatial learning/memory dysfunction. Bolus of norepinephrine (3.1 μmol/kg i.p.) used two days after 8 min ischemia saved 94.2%, 6 min ischemia applied 2 days after 10 min ischemia rescued 89.9%, and an injection of 3-nitropropionic acid (20 mg/kg i.p.) applied two days after 10 min ischemia protected 77.5% of CA1 neurons. Thus, the second pathophysiological stress, if applied at a suitable time after lethal ischemia, represents a significant therapeutic window to opportunity for salvaging neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region against delayed neuronal death.