Attempts to Displace the Indigenous Antibiotic Resistant Gut Flora of Chicken by Feeding Sensitive Strains of Escherichia coli Prior to Slaughter

Attempts to limit the use of antibiotics have not, in general, resulted in the gut flora in farm animals becoming predominantly sensitive. Partial success has been demonstrated, however, by feeding chickens with antibiotic sensitive Escherichia coli known to be good colonizers of the chicken gut. Where feeding was done prior to slaughter a corresponding reduction in carcass contamination by resistant E. coli was observed.     

Fluctuations in Escherichia coli O-serotypes in Pigs Throughout Life in the Presence and Absence of Antibiotic Treatment

A detailed study, throughout life, of the coliform and Escherichia coli gut flora of two pigs, is presented. One pig was given oral tetracycline for 3 d on two separate occasions; the other pig was not treated and housed separately. The fluctuations in numbers of coliforms, O-serotypes of E. coli , the occurrence and persistence of antibiotic resistance, and their interrelations, are analysed for both animals. Oral tetracycline profoundly affected the proportion of antibiotic sensitive and resistant E. coli , and, by selecting for R-factor bearing O-serotypes, limited the number of O-serotypes isolated from individual faceal specimens. Specific O-serotypes exhibited marked differences in their ability to persist in the gut of the control pig. The R-factor bearing O-serotypes, selected by tetracycline treatment, also showed differences in ability to persist after treatment indicating that properties other than the possession of R-factors, decide colonizing ability. The size of the colony sample for serotype analysis is discussed.     

The Effect of Tetracycline on the Coliform Gut Flora of Broiler Chickens with Special Reference to Antibiotic Resistance and O-Serotypes of Escherichia coli

The effect of terramycin, administered prophylactically in drinking water, on the gut flora of broiler birds was investigated. Exposure to the antibiotic for only 24 h profoundly affected the counts of tetracycline-resistant strains and selected O-serotypes carrying resistance determinants. Large numbers of Escherichia coli resistant to sulphonamides were found in treated and control birds and this is discussed in relation to the use of sulphaquinoxaline as a coccidiostat. Evidence of carcass contamination by antibiotic resistant E. coli found in the gut is presented.     

The spatial pattern of soil-dwelling termites in primary and logged forest in Sabah, Malaysia

Abstract.  1. Primary and logged lowland dipterocarp forest sites were sampled for subterranean termites using soil pits located on a grid system in order to detect any patchiness in their distribution.
2. A spatial pattern in termite distributions was observed in the primary and logged sites, but the response differed between soil-feeding and non-soil-feeding termites.
3. Spatial analysis showed that soil-feeding termites were homogeneously distributed in the primary forest but significantly aggregated in the logged forest. This pattern was reversed for non-soil-feeding termites and may result from differences in resource provisioning between the two sites.
4. Gaps in termite distribution comprised a greater area than patches for both feeding groups and sites, but gaps dominated the logged site.
5. A significant association between soil-feeding and non-soil-feeding termite distributions occurred at both sites. This arose from an association between patches in the primary forest and between gaps in the logged forest.
6. Termite spatial pattern was optimally observed at a minimum extent of 64 m and lag of 2 m.
7. The spatially explicit SADIE (Spatial Analysis by Distances IndicEs) analyses were more successful than (non-spatially explicit) multivariate analysis (Canonical Correspondence Analysis) at detecting associations between termite spatial distributions and that of other biotic and abiotic variables.     

The effect of nematicides, applied to the seed rows in spring, on growth and yield of sugar beet in Docking-disorder-affected fields

Both Trichodorus spp. and Longidorus spp. damage roots of sugar-beet seedlings in sandy soil, causing Docking disorder. Trials in infested fields between 1969 and 1972 tested the effects of fumigation along the rows with different amounts of D-D or Telone applied either two weeks before sowing or immediately before sowing, application of the systemic nematicide aldicarb (Temik) in the furrow with the seed during sowing, and top-dressing with nitrogen. Seedling establishment was often decreased by fumigation immediately before sowing, especially when followed by excessive rainfall, but only rarely by earlier fumigation or by aldicarb; differences in numbers of roots harvested were smaller because hand-singling removed excess seedlings. There was usually little difference between the yield increases given by the most effective treatments, which were aldicarb at 1·12 kg active ingredient/ha and 2·2–6·6 ml D-D or Telone/m of row at either time of application. Nitrogen top-dressing never affected sugar yield significantly. Longidorus spp. and Trichodorus spp. were both controlled well in the fumigated row but much less well at 13 cm, and not at all at 25 cm from the row (i.e. mid-way between two treated rows).     

Some effects, especially on yield, of artificially defoliating sugar beet

The effects of completely defoliating sugar beet at different dates from May to October were examined in four years. In each year there were plots given the usual nitrogen fertiliser application to the seedbed, and also in two of the years plots given no nitrogen. At harvest in mid-November, minimum root weights followed defoliation in July or August, but defoliation in August or later gave minimum sugar contents. When nitrogen was applied to the seedbed sugar yields were smallest after August defoliation; in the absence of nitrogen, July defoliation gave the lowest sugar yields, root yield being smaller but sugar content usually greater than with nitrogen. Up to 40% of the sugar yield was lost by July or August defoliation and late defoliation increased some of the impurities in the root juice. Yields, and recovery from defoliation, were greater with nitrogen than without. Partial defoliation in May had relatively little effect on yield. Defoliation affected the incidence of virus yellows differently in different years.     

The impact of dimethoate on the spatial distribution of beneficial arthropods in winter wheat

The within‐field spatial distribution of beneficial arthropods was assessed using two‐dimensional grids of pitfall traps and suction sampling across two winter wheat fields of 4 and 16 ha, before and after an application of dimethoate. An unsprayed 6 m wide buffer zone was left around half the edge of the larger field. Arthropod numbers fluctuated to varying extents prior to spraying. Two species of Carabidae (Pterostichus madidus and P. melanarius), Linyphiidae, Lycosidae and Aphidius spp. (Braconidae) all showed their greatest reduction after spraying. For five carabid taxa, Tachyporus spp. (Staphylinidae) and Collembola the decline in numbers following spraying was no greater than any reduction found during the pre‐spraying period. Within field spatial distributions of three arthropod groups were analysed using SADIE. P. madidus, present in patches across the centre of both fields prior to spraying, was removed by dimethoate and by 34 days after spraying had recovered most at the field edges. Linyphiidae were evenly distributed across both fields prior to spraying. Their numbers were reduced considerably by dimethoate and they did not recover to pre‐spray levels. However, where recovery occurred this was across the centre of both fields indicating their potential to reinvade whole fields. Aphidius species were also evenly distributed across both fields prior to spraying, but did not recover after spraying. Some, but not all arthropods survived within the unsprayed buffer zone and there was some indication that reinvasion of the mid‐field was more extensive where this was present. The importance of field margins with respect to insecticide treatments is discussed.