Assessment of the efficacy of disinfectants on surfaces

The Literature on testing the efficacy of disinfectants covers a century. Most predominant and standardized are the so called suspension tests that allow for the quantitative estimation of the microbicidal activity (log reduction factors) of disinfectants on test organisms suspended in solutions of these products.Since the outcome of suspension tests might be a poor predictor for the efficacy of a disinfectant under practical circumstances, especially with regard to bacteria attached to surfaces, a variety of test procedures have been designed to mimic those conditions. Within the framework of CEN/TC 216 a quantitative surface test has been developed to assess the activity of disinfectants on bacteria or fungi attached to steenless steel surfaces. Preliminary data suggest that covering a dried inoculum with disinfectant without any further mechanical action to improve contact between organisms and disinfectant, will usually result in lower reduction factors than those obtained with suspension tests. Comparative testing further suggests that by applying mechanical action, with the effect of resuspending cells in the liquid on the surface,—similar to mopping, brushing etc.— will result in higher reduction rates. Although not unexpected these findings emphasize the importance of designing test methods based on practical applications of disinfectants.     

Antibacterial activity of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol

The minimum inhibiting concentrations (MIC) of ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) for staphylococci and streptococci in broth are in the range of 1–5 g/ml. In the same range, both compounds are also bactericidal. In media containing 4% serum or 5% blood the antibacterial activity is strongly reduced (MIC 50g/ml). Gram-negative bacteria are resistant to THC and CBD.     

An evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a surface test for the activity of disinfectants

A collaborative study was carried out to determine the precision of a disinfectant surface test method which is currently under consideration for development as a harmonized European standard surface test. Results indicate that significant variation in microbicidal effect occurs both within and between test laboratories despite careful standardization of test conditions, but that the variability may be less than that associated with suspension tests. Indications are that much of this variability derives from random variations in the resistance of the test strains from day to day and, most particularly, from test period to test period both within as well as between laboratories. It is concluded that although the test may be sufficiently reliable to be used as a standard method, adequate replication must be specified to distinguish borderline pass from borderline fail concentrations.