Maternal responsiveness of sows towards piglet's screams during the first 24 h postpartum

In this study we focused on sow responsiveness towards piglet screams which are proposed to have an important link to posture changes and early piglet crushing. A sow's responsiveness to screams of her piglets was investigated along the first 24 h after birth, the period of highest mortality, in 15 lactating sows housed in farrowing crates. We compared the sow's response to playbacks of screams of trapped piglets to her response to a control sound during birth, 8–12 h postpartum and 20–24 h postpartum. We did the same with playbacks of screams of fighting piglets during nursings 8–12 h postpartum and 20–24 h postpartum. The sow’ responsiveness to screams of own trapped piglets was analyzed within the whole 24 h and to screams of fighting piglets 30 min between 8 and 12 h postpartum and 30 min between 20 and 24 h postpartum. A sow was scored as responsive if she changed her posture in response to the stimuli. Sows had a four times higher response towards playbacks with screams than towards the control stimulus. The proportion of the sows’ responsiveness to screams (44%) of trapped piglets did not change significantly between birth, 8–12 h postpartum and 20–24 h postpartum. Sows responded to 28% of playbacks of fighting piglets by terminating a nursing independently from the time after birth. Playbacks and real screams of own piglets were similarly effective in evoking a response for both types of screams. There was no significant association between the sows’ responsiveness to screams of trapped piglets and piglet mortality nor between screams of fighting piglets and weight gain. In conclusion our results indicate that sows maintained their responsiveness towards piglet screams during trapping and during fighting for teats within the first 24 h. Playbacks and real screams were similarly effective in evoking a response. We discuss the importance of the sound characteristics of piglet screams related to the sows’ response.     

Nursing Synchronization and Milk Ejection Failure as Maternal Strategies to Reduce Allosuckling in Pair-Housed Sows (Sus scrofa domestica)

Non‐offspring nursing (allosuckling) is costly for lactating females. It is reasonable to assume, therefore, that mechanisms have evolved to control the frequency of allosuckling. It is suggested that the synchronization of nursing between females could be such a mechanism. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nursing synchronization is related to the timing of nursing behaviour of paired sows and the behaviour of alien piglets in relation to allosuckling. Specifically, we predicted that: (i) nursing synchronization will increase if there is a real risk of allosuckling compared with a situation where there is none, (ii) nursing synchronization indeed reduces allosuckling and, therefore, those nursings with allosuckling attempts will be less closely synchronized than those without allosuckling attempts and (iii) in non‐synchronized nursings, the sows will more often employ another strategy to reduce allosuckling, namely, they will make the nursings non‐nutritive by not releasing milk. Ten pairs of sows and their litters were used in this study. For each pair, the two sows were housed individually until their litters were weaned; however, their litters had access to both sows from day 11 post‐partum. The behaviour of the 10 pairs of sows with their litters was videotaped for 6 h on days 10, 11, 17 and 24 post‐partum. The frequency of allosuckling attempts, non‐nutritive nursings and allosuckling during milk ejection was analysed for every pair for every day of observation. The observed frequency of nursing synchronization was high. The median interval between the start of a nursing within one pair of sows was 32 s. The first prediction was supported as synchronization became significantly tighter when piglets were given the possibility to allosuckle on day 11 [Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) statistics, p < 0.0001]. The second prediction was also supported; the nursings were less closely synchronized when there were allosuckling attempts (CMH statistics, p < 0.05). Of all nursings, 36% had an allosuckling attempt; however, only 17% resulted in real allosuckling. Evidence in favour of the third prediction was also found as non‐nutritive nursings were more frequent in non‐synchronized nursings (CMH statistics, p < 0.05). Finally, real allosuckling during milk ejection was unrelated to the degree of nursing synchronization, as in less synchronized nursings, the sows responded to allosuckling attempts by not releasing milk. Our results suggest that sows are not able to completely suppress allosuckling; however, they can reduce its frequency through nursing synchronization and non‐nutritive nursings.     

Sow responsiveness to human contacts and piglet vocalization during 24 h after onset of parturition

Sow responsiveness towards external disturbances and concurrent postural changes are proposed to be an important cause of early piglet crushing. The aim of the present study was to assess whether loose housed sows change their responsiveness over time within the first 24 h after birth of the first piglet upon exposure to different types of human contact and towards piglets’ scream. The responsiveness of the sows (n = 17) was scored during: (i) blood sampling of the sow during 24 h after the onset of parturition, (ii) human handling of a piglet at 0, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after birth, (iii) screaming when a piglet was trapped underneath the sow and (iv) exposure to playback of piglets’ screams at 10 and 24 h after the onset of parturition. A sow was scored as responsive if she changed her posture in response to the stimuli. The behavioral scores were analyzed during three predefined periods: parturition (from birth of first piglet to birth of last piglet), phase 1 (from birth of last piglet to 12 h after birth of first piglet) and phase 2 (from 12 h after birth of first piglet to 24 h after birth of first piglet). The responsiveness of sows towards humans during blood sampling differed between the three periods (p < 0.01), whereas it did not differ between periods during human handling of piglets. During blood sampling, fewer sows were responsive during phase 1 (5%) compared to during parturition (11%) and the later phase 2 (17%). We did not detect any temporal changes in sow responsiveness towards natural incidences of screaming of own trapped piglet between the three periods (it remained high: 80%), whereas sows exposed to playback of piglet screams had a higher probability (p < 0.05) to react at 12 h (50%) than at 24 h (25%). In conclusion, the responsiveness of sows toward direct human contact was lower during the first 12 h postpartum. The careful handling of piglets in the home pen had a minimal effect on the probability of postural changes in sows. However, sows were highly reactive towards the screaming of own trapped piglet during the whole 24 h period pp. The relative lower responsiveness towards playbacks, decreasing from 12 to 24 h pp, cast doubt upon the piglet scream playback test as a useful approach to evaluate maternal responsiveness in sows.     

Calling by Domestic Piglets during Simulated Crushing and Isolation: A Signal of Need?

This study examined whether piglet distress vocalizations vary with age, body weight and health status, according to the predictions of the honest signalling of need evolutionary model. Vocalizations were recorded during manual squeezing (a simulation of being crushed by mother sow) and during isolation on Days 1 and 7 after birth in piglets from 15 litters. We predicted that during squeezing, younger, lighter and sick piglets would call more intensely because they are in higher risk of dying during crushing and therefore they benefit more from the sow’s reaction to intensive vocalization. For isolation, we predicted that lighter and younger piglets would call more because they are more vulnerable to adverse effects of the separation. Calls were analyzed in their time and frequency domain. The rate of calling, call duration, proportion of high-pitched calls and eight acoustic parameters characterizing frequency distribution and tonality were used as indicators of acoustic signalling intensity. Piglets that experienced “squeezing” on Day 1 produced more intense acoustic distress signalling than on Day 7. Lighter piglets called more during squeezing than heavier piglets. Health status did not significantly affect any of the indicators of intensity of vocalization during squeezing. In isolation, none of the parameters of vocalization intensity were affected either by the age or by the weight of the piglets. In summary, the model of honest signalling of need was confirmed in the squeezed situation, but not in the isolation situation.     

Dimensions of maternal behaviour characteristics in domestic and wildxdomestic crossbred sows

We examined the maternal behaviour of seven domestic and seven wildxdomestic primiparous sows during 10 days post partum to investigate two questions: (1) Did maternal behaviour change during domestication? (2) Can the interindividual variability of maternal behaviour be subsumed into a few dimensions of maternal temperament? We recorded: (a) willingness to leave the nest for food on Day 2; (b) reaction to a playback of squeezed piglet distress vocalisation on Day 2; (c) spontaneous nursing behaviour and spontaneous lying-down behaviour on Day 5 (from an overnight video recording); (d) reactions to playbacks of various piglet distress vocalisations on Day 6 and (e) reactions to a human in the 'nest' with piglets on Day 9. Moreover, data on baseline cortisol saliva concentration and its increase during a brief transportation period and novel environment challenge at the age of 5 months were available. Crossbred sows did not differ from domestic ones in any aspect of maternal behaviour except for a higher tendency to terminate final massage during nursings and a higher frequency of changing posture from lying to standing and back during the night. Factor analysis (based on correlation matrix of 11 behaviour and cortisol variables calculated for all 14 sows after removing the effect of breed) indicated that 82% of the variability in the data could be explained by three factors: first, 'calmness' on which low night time frequency of major posture changes, carefulness of lying-down behaviour and high propensity to remain in nursing position after milk ejection loaded positively while cortisol concentrations during challenge loaded negatively; second, 'protectiveness' with high loadings of the reaction scores to the playbacks of piglet distress calls and the human presence near the piglets; and third, 'nursing activity' which was strongly positively associated with nursing frequency, and negatively with the proportion of nutritive nursings and baseline cortisol values. The results indicate that most aspects of pig maternal behaviour have not been significantly changed by domestication and that substantial variability in maternal behaviour exists between sows, perhaps in the form of several behaviour characteristics which encompass both behaviour and endocrine profiles of the sows.     

Vocal Communication in Pigs: Who are Nursing Piglets Screaming at?

Vocalizations during competition among nursing piglets were studied to investigate their possible effects, functions and implications for welfare. In Expt 1, two experimental piglets in each of 14 litters were temporarily deprived of milk by covering their preferred teats on the sow's udder. These piglets spent more time away from their teats than two control piglets, and vocalized frequently in the 2 min before milk ejection. Frequency of vocalization showed no consistent change over time within nursings; nor did it change in successive nursings despite the fact that hunger presumably increased. In Expt 2, tape recordings of intense vocalizations (screams) produced by piglets competing at the udder were played to 22 litters while they were nursing; each litter was played its own recording, a recording from another litter and silence as a control. Of 51 nursings analysed, 14 were terminated without milk ejection, all during playbacks. When the sow did nurse successfully during a playback, nursing was shorter (138 s) than during the silent controls (179 s). Both these responses by the sow might be expected to advance the next nursing. Piglets rarely showed any apparent response to screaming either from their littermates or from the loudspeaker. These results suggest that the calls function mainly as a signal to the sow that some piglets are being excluded from the current nursing episode.     

A new wireless system for decentralised measurement of physiological parameters from shake flasks

Background  

Shake flasks are widely used because of their low price and simple handling. Many researcher are, however, not aware of the physiological consequences of oxygen limitation and substrate overflow metabolism that occur in shake flasks. Availability of a wireless measuring system brings the possibilities for quality control and design of cultivation conditions.