BAX is a pro-apoptotic member of the BCL-2 protein family. At the onset of apoptosis, monomeric, cytoplasmic BAX is activated and translocates to the outer mitochondrial membrane, where it forms an oligomeric pore. The chemical mechanism of BAX activation is controversial, and several
in vitro and
in vivo methods of its activation are known. One of the most commonly used
in vitro methods is activation with detergents, such as
n-octyl glucoside. During BAX activation with
n-octyl glucoside, it has been shown that BAX forms high molecular weight complexes that are larger than the combined molecular weight of BAX monomer and one detergent micelle. These large complexes have been ascribed to the oligomerization of BAX prior to its membrane insertion and pore formation. This is in contrast to the
in vivo studies that suggest that active BAX inserts into the outer mitochondrial membrane as a monomer and then undergoes oligomerization. Here, to simultaneously determine the molecular weight and the number of BAX proteins per BAX-detergent micelle during detergent activation, we have used an approach that combines two single-molecule sensitivity technique, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, and fluorescence-intensity distribution analysis. We have tested a range of detergents as follows:
n-octyl glucoside, dodecyl maltoside, Triton X-100, Tween 20, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid, and cholic acid. With these detergents we observe that BAX is a monomer before, during, and after interaction with micelles. We conclude that detergent activation of BAX is not congruent with oligomerization and that in physiologic buffer conditions BAX can assume two stable monomeric conformations, one inactive and one active.BAX
2 is a pro-apoptotic member of the BCL-2 protein family. In a simplified apoptosis model, monomeric inactive BAX is localized in the cytoplasm of healthy nondying cells (
1). During apoptosis BAX is activated and translocates to the outer mitochondrial membrane (
2) where it inserts as a monomer (
3), undergoes oligomerization (
4), and forms a pore through which cytochrome
c and other apoptotic factors are released into the cytoplasm. Once in the cytoplasm, these apoptotic factors induce the activation of the effector caspases that execute the cell death process. This mechanism, which is generally correct, requires that soluble BAX becomes integrated into the mitochondrial membrane where it forms a functional oligomeric pore capable of cytochrome
c release. However, the molecular mechanism of BAX activation remains controversial (
5,
6).It has been understood for some time, but frequently ignored, that activity of the BCL-2 family proteins is exhibited in cells when these proteins are associated with the hydrophobic environment of membranes. Therefore, it has always seemed that attention to the effect of hydrophobic environments on the BCL-2 family proteins would be rewarding. It has been shown that BAX can be directly activated by treatment with nonionic detergents such as
n-octyl glucoside, dodecyl maltoside, and Triton X-100 (
1,
7). During activation by nonionic detergents, to gain the ability to form pores in a bilayer membrane, BAX needs to undergo a major conformational transition from a globular protein with two pore-forming α-helices 5 and 6 hidden in the protein core (
8) to a conformation in which these two helices are exposed and inserted into a lipid membrane (
3,
5,
9). The nature of this active conformation of BAX is important for the understanding of the death decision in cells. Most proposals suggest that in a cell this activated form of BAX protein is initiated and maintained by the interactions with other proteins, such as tBID, or by BAX itself as a homo-oligomer (
7,
10).Nonionic detergents have been commonly used to activate BAX for
in vitro studies because they are reliably effective and simple to employ. However, little is known about the detailed molecular mechanism of BAX activation by these detergents and its comparability with
in vivo activation of BAX. What is known is that concentrations of detergent above their critical micelle concentration (CMC) are necessary for BAX activation. This suggests that, to be activated, BAX needs to interact with detergent micelles instead of monomeric detergent molecules. For example, in the case of BAX activation by
n-octyl glucoside, it has been shown that
n-octyl glucoside concentration should be 1% (w/v) (
7), which is well above the CMC for this detergent (0.6% w/v) (
11). In addition, it has also been shown that above their individual CMC concentrations most BAX-activating detergents produce a change in BAX conformation that can be detected by a conformation-sensitive 6A7 antibody against BAX (
1,
12,
13). In cellular experiments this feature of BAX reactivity to 6A7 antibody is commonly associated with the onset of apoptosis (
14,
15). However, CHAPS does not generate the antibody-detected conformational change or the activation of BAX. The small micelle size of this detergent (10 kDa) suggests that perhaps BAX cannot adopt an activated state with this detergent. However, cholic acid with even smaller micelle size (4 kDa) can partially activate BAX (
1).Many important detergent properties are associated with micelles. The formation of detergent micelles in solution is concentration-dependent beginning at the CMC. The CMC value for a detergent has practical importance because in most cases only monomers of detergent can be removed by dialysis, and therefore, it is easier to remove detergent monomers for a detergent with high CMC value than for a detergent with low CMC (
11). For BAX this same consideration applies to its activation with
n-octyl glucoside (CMC ∼23 m
m) as compared with its activation with Triton X-100 (CMC ∼0.25 m
m). The ease of dialysis is why, in most cases, OG is used to activate BAX
in vitro.It has been shown by analytical gel filtration that, when incubated with
n-octyl glucoside, BAX creates complexes with molecular weight larger than the combined size of a BAX monomer (21 kDa) and an
n-octyl glucoside micelle (∼26 kDa) (
7,
11). It has also been shown that in defined liposomes BAX pore formation requires oligomerization (
16). These data combined with the knowledge that oligomerization is important for the biological function of BAX led to a hypothesis that BAX oligomerizes during its detergent activation prior to membrane insertion (
7). However, it has been shown that
in vivo activated BAX inserts into the outer mitochondrial membrane as a monomer (
3), and to create a pore, BAX undergoes oligomerization in this membrane (
4). This discrepancy between the oligomeric state of active BAX prior to its insertion into a lipid membrane
in vivo (monomer) and
in vitro (possibly hexamer or octamer) led us to study the oligomerization state of BAX in detergent micelles. The important issue is whether BAX activation requires protein oligomerization or whether active BAX conformation can be generated from a single protein monomer. To solve this issue we used two single-molecule sensitivity techniques:
fluorescence
correlation
spectroscopy (FCS) (
17) and fluorescence-intensity distribution analysis (FIDA) (
18). Combined use of FCS and FIDA allows simultaneous determination of the apparent molecular weight and the number of fluorescently labeled BAX monomers per protein-detergent micelle. Our results are consistent with previously established results in which BAX forms high molecular weight protein-detergent micelles with
n-octyl glucoside (
4) and show that BAX is present as a monomer in these complexes. In addition, we determined the apparent molecular weight and the number of BAX proteins bound per protein-detergent micelles formed by BAX and micelles of five additional detergents (dodecyl maltoside, Triton X-100, Tween 20, cholic acid, and CHAPS). Our data show that BAX is a monomer before, during, and after interaction with the micelles of all tested detergents.
相似文献