Adenylylsulfate reductase (adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate [APS] reductase [APSR]) plays a key role in catalyzing APS to sulfite in dissimilatory sulfate reduction. Here, we report the crystal structure of APSR from
Desulfovibrio gigas at 3.1-Å resolution. Different from the α
2β
2-heterotetramer of the
Archaeoglobus fulgidus, the overall structure of APSR from
D. gigas comprises six αβ-heterodimers that form a hexameric structure. The flavin adenine dinucleotide is noncovalently attached to the α-subunit, and two [4Fe-4S] clusters are enveloped by cluster-binding motifs. The substrate-binding channel in
D. gigas is wider than that in
A. fulgidus because of shifts in the loop (amino acid 326 to 332) and the α-helix (amino acid 289 to 299) in the α-subunit. The positively charged residue Arg160 in the structure of
D. gigas likely replaces the role of Arg83 in that of
A. fulgidus for the recognition of substrates. The C-terminal segment of the β-subunit wraps around the α-subunit to form a functional unit, with the C-terminal loop inserted into the active-site channel of the α-subunit from another αβ-heterodimer. Electrostatic interactions between the substrate-binding residue Arg282 in the α-subunit and Asp159 in the C terminus of the β-subunit affect the binding of the substrate. Alignment of APSR sequences from
D. gigas and
A. fulgidus shows the largest differences toward the C termini of the β-subunits, and structural comparison reveals notable differences at the C termini, activity sites, and other regions. The disulfide comprising Cys156 to Cys162 stabilizes the C-terminal loop of the β-subunit and is crucial for oligomerization. Dynamic light scattering and ultracentrifugation measurements reveal multiple forms of APSR upon the addition of AMP, indicating that AMP binding dissociates the inactive hexamer into functional dimers, presumably by switching the C terminus of the β-subunit away from the active site. The crystal structure of APSR, together with its oligomerization properties, suggests that APSR from sulfate-reducing bacteria might self-regulate its activity through the C terminus of the β-subunit.Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are a special group of prokaryotes that are found in sulfate-rich environments because of their ability to metabolize sulfate. SRB use sulfate as the final electron acceptor in various anaerobic environments, such as soil, oil fields, the sea, or the innards of animals or even human beings (
10,
11,
19,
25,
33). Their ability to degrade sulfate offers protection against environmental pollution. SRB can remove sulfate and toxic heavy atoms from factory waste waters (
12). The
Desulfovibrio species is a much-studied representative of SRB, and
Desulfovibrio gigas has been studied under many diverse conditions to elucidate metabolic pathways (
23,
35).Sulfate reduction is one of the oldest forms of cellular metabolism. The reduction can be either assimilatory or dissimilatory. Sulfate is the terminal electron acceptor in dissimilatory reduction and the raw material for the biosynthesis of cysteine in assimilatory reduction. The latter type of reduction occurs in archaebacteria, bacteria, fungi, and plants via various pathways (
17). For example, in
Escherichia coli, the reduction initially catalyzes sulfate to adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (APS) by ATP sulfurylase. APS is then phosphorylated by APS kinase to 3′-phosphate APS, which is then further reduced to sulfite by 3′-phosphate APS reductase (APSR). Finally, sulfite is reduced by sulfite reductase to sulfide, which condenses with
O-acetylserine by
O-acetylserine lyase to form cysteine. For comparison, in dissimilatory sulfate reduction, sulfate is first catalyzed by ATP sulfurylase to APS, which is then directly reduced by APSR to sulfite. Sulfite is subsequently reduced by dissimilatory sulfite reductase to the following three possible products: trithionite (S
3O
62−), thiosulfate (S
2O
32−), or sulfide (S
2−).Adenylylsulfate reductase, also called APSR, plays an important role in catalyzing APS to AMP and sulfite in the dissimilatory sulfate reduction. APSR was first partially purified and characterized from
Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (
32). Multiple forms of APSR in
Desulfovibrio vulgaris were observed in buffers under varied conditions (
1) and were found in the cytoplasm of cells (
18). APSR from
D. gigas was first purified by Lampreia et al. (
21) and showed a molecular mass of 400 kDa comprised of α- and β-subunits, corresponding to the molecular masses of 70 kDa and 23 kDa, respectively. One flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and two [4Fe-4S] clusters per APSR have been observed and characterized by electron paramagnetic resonance and Mössbauer spectroscopy. The enzyme from
D. gigas has been described as an α
2β complex involving one FAD and two [4Fe-4S] clusters (
20). In
D. vulgaris, APSR is apparently an α
2β
2 complex with a molecular mass of 186 kDa; only one Fe-S cluster is found in the αβ-heterodimer (
31). Thus, the subunit and quaternary structures of APSR and their constitution of cofactors in terms of FAD and iron-sulfur clusters are still under debate. Only the enzyme from
Archaeoglobus fulgidus has benefited from having an X-ray crystal structure. In this APSR, the functional unit has been shown to be the 1:1 αβ-heterodimer, containing two iron-sulfur clusters and one FAD in the structure (
7). However, crystal packing shows that the asymmetric unit is an α
2β
2-heterotetramer.The catalytic mechanism of APSR can be divided into the transport of electrons and the cleavage of APS by FAD. Electron input to the FAD catalyzes the cleavage of APS, releasing AMP and sulfite. Although there have been a number of mechanisms proposed to explain the catalytic cleavage of APS to AMP and sulfite (
7,
8,
13,
20,
34), many features of the postulated mechanism remain unsettled, including the proteinogenic hydrogen acceptor in the reaction, the conformational change in the enzyme induced by reduction/oxidation of the FAD cofactor, and the reasons for the observed multiple forms of APSR. The divergence between
A. fulgidus and
Desulfovibrio species also suggests an obvious distinction in the phylogeny of the α- and β-subunits of APSR.To clarify the difference between APSR from
A. fulgidus and that from
Desulfovibrio species, we have undertaken a structural study of APSR from
D. gigas for comparison with the
A. fulgidus enzyme. We have isolated and purified APSR directly from massive, anaerobically grown
D. gigas cells for structure determination and characterization. The comparison of the structures and sequences revealing the notable differences at the C termini, activity sites, and other regions for the function is discussed. The structure of oxidized APSR from
D. gigas provides much direct evidence about the subunit interactions and the role of the quaternary structure in the regulation of the catalytic mechanism.
相似文献