Reward partitioning in Capparis spp. along ecological gradient

Summary The genus Capparis is represented in Israel by three taxons of the section spinosa. The pollinators of the three taxa are hawkmoths, crepuscular bees of the genus Proxylocopa and various daily bees. However, the efficiency of the different pollinators is very varied with respect to the individual taxons. Hawkmoths were frequently observed as pollinators of C. spinosa var. aravensis and C. ovata, but rarely on C. spinosa var. aegyptia. All the other bees, on the other hand, were found abundantly on all three taxons, all over the country. The three taxa all provide different rewards for their particular pollinators. Bees visiting C. spinosa var. aegyptia are provided with a lot of pollen but a relatively small amount of nectar, with a low sugar content. C. spinosa var. aravensis and C. ovata (the flowers visited more by hawkmoths), have less pollen but a higher amount of nectar which has a higher concentration of sugar. In drier habitats the emphasis of the reward provided by the flowers is nectar, whilst in the Mediterranean habitats it is the pollen which is the reward, without any connection to the systematic origin of the plant.     

Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department.

Methods and Results

Hospital and 90-day course were prospectively studied in 585 consecutive low-moderate risk acute chest pain patients, of whom 304 were investigated in a designated chest pain center using a pre-specified accelerated diagnostic protocol, while 281 underwent routine care in an internal medicine ward. Hospitalization was longer in the routine care compared with the accelerated diagnostic protocol group (p<0.001). During hospitalization, 298 accelerated diagnostic protocol patients (98%) vs. 57 (20%) routine care patients underwent non-invasive testing, (p<0.001). Throughout the 90-day follow-up, diagnostic imaging testing was performed in 125 (44%) and 26 (9%) patients in the routine care and accelerated diagnostic protocol patients, respectively (p<0.001). Ultimately, most patients in both groups had non-invasive imaging testing. Accelerated diagnostic protocol patients compared with those receiving routine care was associated with a lower incidence of readmissions for chest pain [8 (3%) vs. 24 (9%), p<0.01], and acute coronary syndromes [1 (0.3%) vs. 9 (3.2%), p<0.01], during the follow-up period. The accelerated diagnostic protocol remained a predictor of lower acute coronary syndromes and readmissions after propensity score analysis [OR = 0.28 (CI 95% 0.14–0.59)]. Cost per patient was similar in both groups [($2510 vs. $2703 for the accelerated diagnostic protocol and routine care group, respectively, (p = 0.9)].

Conclusion

An accelerated diagnostic protocol is clinically superior and as cost effective as routine in acute chest pain patients, and may save time and resources.     

Identification and characterization of a novel molecular-recognition and self-assembly domain within the islet amyloid polypeptide

The islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) is a 37 amino acid residue polypeptide that was found to accumulate as amyloid fibrils in the pancreas of individuals with type II diabetes. Previous studies identified various fragments of hIAPP that can form amyloid fibrils in vitro (e.g. hIAPP(8-20), hIAPP(23-27), and hIAPP(30-37)). However, no comparative and systematic information was available on the role of these structural domains (or others) in the process of molecular recognition that mediates fibrillization, in the context of the full-length polypeptide. To systematically map and compare potential recognition domains, we studied the ability of hIAPP to interact with an array of 28 membrane-spotted overlapping peptides that span the entire sequence of hIAPP (i.e. hIAPP(1-10), hIAPP(2-11...), hIAPP(28-37)). Our study clearly identified a major domain of molecular recognition within hIAPP, as the polypeptide was found to bind with high affinity to a defined linear group of peptides ranging from hIAPP(7-16) to hIAPP(12-21). The maximal binding of the full-length polypeptide was to the hIAPP(11-20) peptide fragment (with the sequence RLANFLVHSS). In order to define the minimal fragment, within this apparent recognition motif, that is capable of self-association and thus may serve as the core molecular recognition motif, we examined the ability of truncated analogs of the recognition sequence to self-assemble into amyloid fibrils. The shortest active fragments capable of self-assembly were found to be the pentapeptides FLVHS and NFLVH. The apparent role of this motif in the process of hIAPP self-assembly is consistent with the profile of the hIAAP-binding distribution to the peptide array. The identification of such short recognition motifs is extremely useful in the attempts to develop means to block amyloid fibril formation by hIAPP. It is worth mentioning that this is only the second time in which peptides as short as a pentapeptide were shown to form amyloid fibrils (the other pentapeptide is FGAIL).