Clarifying the Role of the Rostral dmPFC/dACC in Fear/Anxiety: Learning,Appraisal or Expression?

Recent studies have begun to carve out a specific role for the rostral part of the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and adjacent dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) in fear/anxiety. Within a novel general framework of dorsal mPFC/ACC areas subserving the appraisal of threat and concomitant expression of fear responses and ventral mPFC/ACC areas subserving fear regulation, the rostral dmPFC/dACC has been proposed to specifically mediate the conscious, negative appraisal of threat situations including, as an extreme variant, catastrophizing. An alternative explanation that has not been conclusively ruled out yet is that the area is involved in fear learning. We tested two different fear expression paradigms in separate fMRI studies (study 1: instructed fear, study 2: testing of Pavlovian conditioned fear) with independent groups of healthy adult subjects. In both paradigms the absence of reinforcement precluded conditioning. We demonstrate significant BOLD activation of an identical rostral dmPFC/dACC area. In the Pavlovian paradigm (study 2), the area only activated robustly once prior conditioning had finished. Thus, our data argue against a role of the area in fear learning. We further replicate a repeated observation of a dissociation between peripheral-physiological fear responding and rostral dmPFC/dACC activation, strongly suggesting the area does not directly generate fear responses but rather contributes to appraisal processes. Although we succeeded in preventing extinction of conditioned responding in either paradigm, the data do not allow us to definitively exclude an involvement of the area in fear extinction learning. We discuss the broader implications of this finding for our understanding of mPFC/ACC function in fear and in negative emotion more generally.     

EM chromosome mapping using surface-spread polytene chromosomes

Electron micrographs as well as light micrographs of individual surface-spread polytene (SSP) chromosomes indicate more detailed banding patterns than standard squash preparations do. For EM preparations of SSP chromosomes a simple technique is described, avoiding thin-sectioning of chromosomes.     

The use of surface spread polytene chromosomes for high resolution fluorescence microscopic analyses

The technique of surface spreading of polytene chromosomes is applied to fluorescence microscopy. With bisbenzimide Hoechst 33258 stained surface spread polytene chromosomes from the dipteran species Chironomus thummi piger, depiction of the band-interband structure is close to that of electron micrographs of the same enlargement.     

Homooligomeric dA·dU and dA·dT Sequences in Parallel and Antiparallel Strand Orientation: Consequence of the 5-methyl Groups on Stability,Structure and Interaction with the Minor Groove Binding Drug HOECHST 33258

Abstract

Oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing dA·dU base combinations were shown to form parallel stranded DNA. CD spectra and hyperchromicity profiles provide evidence that the structure is very similar to that of a related parallel stranded dA·oligomer. Thermal denaturation studies show that these parallel dAdU sequences are significantly less stable than their dA·analogues in either antiparallel or parallel stranded orientations. The stabilizing effect of the 5- methyl group is similar for parallel and antiparallel sequences. The minor groove binding drug Hoechst 33258 binds with similar affinity to APS dA·and APS dA·dU sequences. However, binding to the PS dA·hairpin is significantly impaired as a consequence of the different groove dimensions and the presence of thymine methyl groups at the binding site. This results in an 8.6 kJmoF reduced free energy of binding for the PS dA·sequence. Replacement of the bulky methyl group with a hydrogen (ie. T -> U) results in significantly stronger Hoechst 33258 binding to the parallel dA·dU sequences with a penalty of only 4.1 kJmol^?1. Our data demonstrate that although Hoechst 33258 detects the altered groove, it is still able to bind a PS duplex containing dA·dU base pairs with high affinity, despite the large structural differences from its regular binding site in APS DNA.     

Multimodal Assessment of Long-Term Memory Recall and Reinstatement in a Combined Cue and Context Fear Conditioning and Extinction Paradigm in Humans

Learning to predict danger via associative learning processes is critical for adaptive behaviour. After successful extinction, persisting fear memories often emerge as returning fear. Investigation of return of fear phenomena, e.g. reinstatement, have only recently began and to date, many critical questions with respect to reinstatement in human populations remain unresolved. Few studies have separated experimental phases in time even though increasing evidence shows that allowing for passage of time (and consolidation) between experimental phases has a major impact on the results. In addition, studies have relied on a single psychophysiological dimension only (SCRs/SCL or FPS) which hampers comparability between different studies that showed both differential or generalized return of fear following a reinstatement manipulation. In 93 participants, we used a multimodal approach (fear-potentiated startle, skin conductance responses, fear ratings to asses fear conditioning (day 1), extinction (day 2) as well as delayed memory recall and reinstatement (day 8) in a paradigm that probed contextual and cued fear intra-individually. Our findings show persistence of conditioning and extinction memory over time and demonstrate that reinstated fear responses were qualitatively different between dependent variables (subjective fear ratings, FPS, SCRs) as well as between cued and contextual CSs. While only the arousal-related measurement (SCRs) showed increasing reactions following reinstatement to the cued CSs, no evidence of reinstatement was observed for the subjective ratings and fear-related measurement (FPS). In contrast, for contextual CSs, reinstatement was evident as differential and generalized reinstatement in fear ratings as well as generally elevated physiological fear (FPS) and arousal (SCRs) related measurements to all contextual CSs (generalized non-differential reinstatement). Returning fear after reinstatement likely depends on a variety of variables (experimental design, dependent measurements) and more systematic investigations with respect to critical determinants of reinstatement in humans are required.