Two-dimensional crystallization of bovine rhodopsin

Bovine rhodopsin has been clustered into two-dimensional crystals in highly purified native rod disk membranes and studied with negative staining and transmission electron microscopy. The lattice is P2(1) with dimensions of 8.3 X 7.9 nm and interaxis angles of 86 +/- 3 degrees. 110 images of ordered areas were digitized and aligned with computer-correlation methods to calculate an average image with diffraction to the fourth order. The images were computer-filtered and reconstructed to approx. 2 nm resolution. When crystals appeared they covered 20-40% of the surface of the preparation and, since rhodopsin is at least 95% of the protein, there is no doubt that the crystals were due to rhodopsin. There appear to be two rhodopsin dimers per unit cell. Each rhodopsin molecules takes up about 7.5 nm2 of membrane area and is estimated to be associated with about 12 lipids on each side of the membrane. The membrane area found for bovine rhodopsin supports the rhodopsin origin of rarely seen but more highly ordered two-dimensional crystals found in detergent-treated frog rod membranes (Corless, J.M., McCaslin, D.R. and Scott, B.L. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1116-1120). Furthermore, the rhodopsin membrane area is close to that of bacteriorhodopsin and is consistent with a seven transmembrane helix structure proposed for rhodopsin (for references see Dratz, E.A. and Hargrave, D.A. (1983) Trends Biochem. Sci. 8, 128-131). Crystallization was accomplished by lowering the pH to 5.5 near the isoelectric point of rhodopsin, raising the salt concentration of 2 M (NH4)2SO4, adding 5% glucose and 0.02% Hibitane (Ayerst), a cationic amphipathic antiseptic that favored crystal growth.     

Mapping and length measurements of restriction enzyme fragments by electron microscopy.

1. We have mapped by electron microscopy the DNA-fragments formed by the action of the restriction endonuclease from Arthrobacter luteus of phi X 174 replicative form DNA. These fragments were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and hybridized to phiX 174 single stranded DNA. The partial duplex molecules were inspected in the electron microscope. In this way the relative order of eleven fragments ranging in size from approximately 100 to 1000 nucleotide pairs has been established and compared with that deduced from reciprocal digestion studies. 2. The measured lengths of the fragments agreed well with the lengths found by gel electrophoresis. 3. The purity of the isolated fragments was checked. Most of the contaminating fragments derive from nearest neighbours in the preparative polyacrylamide gels.     

Chloroplast protein import : quantitative analysis of precursor binding

The first step of chloroplast protein import is binding of a precursor protein to the surface of the organelle. Precursor binding for the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase to isolated pea chloroplasts was investigated using a receptor-ligand binding assay. Translocation of precursors was blocked by conducting the binding assays at 0°C. Binding of precursor was judged to be receptor mediated by the following criteria: (a) precursor binding was saturable at between 1500 and 3500 molecules per chloroplast; (b) binding is a high affinity interaction with a dissociation constant of 6 to 10 nanomoles; (c) binding is physiologically productive since most of the bound precursors could be imported from the bound state; and (d) precursor binding was sensitive to both protease and the sulfhydryl modifying reagent N-ethylmaleimide. The effects of these two reagents differed in that protease reduced the total number of binding sites from the surface of chloroplasts but had little effect on binding affinity, whereas N-ethylmaleimide reduced the binding affinity but had little or no effect on receptor density.     

Transport of proteins into chloroplasts

The import of cytoplasmically synthesized proteins into chloroplasts involves an interaction between at least two components; the precursor protein, and the import apparatus in the chloroplast envelope membrane. This review summarizes the information available about each of these components. Precursor proteins consist of an amino terminal transit peptide attached to a passenger protein. Transit peptides from various precurosrs are diverse with respect to length and amino acid sequence; analysis of their sequences has not revealed insight into their mode of action. A variety of foreign passenger proteins can be imported into chloroplasts when a transit peptide is present at the amino terminus. However, foreign passenger proteins are not imported as efficiently as natural passenger proteins, and some chimeric precursor proteins are not imported into chloroplasts at all. Therefore, the passenger protein, as well as the transit peptide, influences the import process. Import begins by binding of the precursor to the chloroplast surface. It has been suggested that this binding is mediated by a receptor, but evidence to support this hypothesis remains incomplete and a receptor protein has not yet been characterized. Protein translocation requires energy derived from ATP hydrolysis, although there are conflicting reports as to where hydrolysis occurs and it is unclear how this energy is utilized. The mechanism(s) whereby proteins are translocated across either the two envelope membranes or the thylakoid membrane is not known.Abbreviations EPSP 5-enolpyruvyulshikimate-3-phosphate - LHCP Chlorophyll a/b binding protein of the light-harvesting complex - NPT-II Neomycin phosphotransferase II - PC Plastocyanin - Pr Precursor - Rubisco Ribulose-1,5,-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase - SS Small subunit of Rubisco     

Adenine nucleotide translocase-dependent anion transport in pea chloroplasts

Pea chloroplasts were found to take up actively ATP and ADP and exchange the external nucleotides for internal ones. Using carrier-free [¹⁴C]ATP, the rate of nucleotide transport in chloroplasts prepared from 12–14-day-old plants was calculated to be 330 μmol ATP/g chlorophyll/min, and the transport was not affected by light or temperature between 4 and 22°C. Adenine nucleotide uptake was inhibited only slightly by carboxyatractylate, whereas bongkrekic acid was nearly as effective an inhibitor of the translocator in pea chloroplasts as it was in mammalian mitochondria. There was no counter-transport of adenine nucleotides with substrates carried on the phosphate translocator including inorganic phosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. However, internal or external phosphoenolpyruvate, normally considered to be transported on the phosphate carrier in chloroplasts, was able to exchange readily with adenine nucleotides. Furthermore, inorganic pyrophosphate which is not transported by the phosphate carrier initiated efflux of phosphoenolpyruvate as well as ATP from the chloroplast. These findings illustrate some interesting similarities as well as differences between the various plant phosphate and nucleotide transport systems which may relate to their role in photosynthesis.     

The role of the transit peptide in the routing of precursors toward different chloroplast compartments

The role of the transit peptide in the routing of imported proteins inside the chloroplast was investigated with chimeric proteins in which the transit peptides for the nuclear-encoded ferredoxin and plastocyanin precursors were exchanged. Import and localization experiments with a reconstituted chloroplast system show that the ferredoxin transit peptide directs mature plastocyanin away from its correct location, the thylakoid lumen, to the stroma. With the plastocyanin transit peptide-mature ferredoxin chimera, a processing intermediate is arrested on its way to the lumen. We propose a two domain hypothesis for the plastocyanin transit peptide: the first domain functions in the chloroplast import process, whereas the second is responsible for transport across the thylakoid membrane. Thus, the transit peptide not only targets proteins to the chloroplast, but also is a major determinant in their subsequent localization within the organelle.     

Galactosyltransferases involved in galactolipid biosynthesis are located in the outer membrane of pea chloroplast envelopes

The galactosylation steps in the biosynthesis of galactolipids involve two different enzymes; a UDP-Gal:diacylglycerol galactosyltransferase and a galactolipid:galactolipid galactosyltransferase. Previous localization studies have shown that in spinach these enzymes are located in the chloroplast envelope. Our results with peas (Pisum sativum var Laxton's Progress No. 9) confirm these results and extend the localization by providing evidence that the galactosyltransferases are in the outer membrane of the envelope. The specific activity of UDP-Gal:diacylglycerol galactosyltransferase in outer membrane preparations was 6 to 10 times greater than that exhibited by inner membrane preparations. In addition, using quantitative sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, it was possible to show that the UDP-Gal:diacylglycerol galactosyltransferase activity associated with inner membrane preparations could be accounted for by outer membrane contamination. It is concluded from these results that this enzyme is located predominantly, if not exclusively, in the outer membrane of the envelope. An analysis of the galactolipid products synthesized by the highly purified outer membrane showed that the galactolipid:galactolipid galactosyltransferase is also present, suggesting that this enzyme is also an outer membrane enzyme. The implication of these results is that the final assembly of galactolipids is carried out on the outer membrane of the chloroplast envelope.     

Analysis of pea chloroplast inner and outer envelope membrane proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and their comparison with stromal proteins

Analysis of inner and outer pea (Pisum sativum var. Laxtons Progress No. 9) chloroplast envelope membranes by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that, although the two membranes have distinct polypeptide compositions, there are several comigrating polypeptides in the two membrane fractions. To determine whether these comigrating polypeptides were identical by criteria other than molecular weight, the membrane proteins were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The results demonstrated that an 86-kilodalton band found in both membranes represents at least two different polypeptides, one an outer membrane protein and the other an inner membrane protein. Several other polypeptide bands found in both membranes appear to be of stromal origin. Two of these polypeptides were shown to be the large and small subunits of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. The large subunit was identified by two-dimensional electrophoresis of envelope membranes to which stromal proteins were added. Additionally, the large and small subunits of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase were immunologically identified using an electrophoretic transfer procedure coupled with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Various treatments, including sonication, resulted in no significant loss of the stromal polypeptides from the outer envelope membranes. Based on these results, it is suggested that the stromal proteins are not simply bound to the outer surface of the vesicles.     

ATP is required for the binding of precursor proteins to chloroplasts

One of the first steps in the transport of nuclear-encoded, cytoplasmically synthesized precursor proteins into chloroplasts is a specific binding interaction between precursor proteins and the surface of the organelle. Although protein translocation into chloroplasts requires ATP hydrolysis, binding is generally thought to be energy independent. A more detailed investigation of precursor binding to the surface of chloroplasts showed that ATP was required for efficient binding. Protein translocation is known to require relatively high levels (1 mM or more) of ATP. As little as 50-100 microM ATP caused significant stimulation of precursor binding over controls with no ATP. Several different precursors were tested and all showed increased binding upon addition of low levels of ATP. Nonhydrolyzable analogs of ATP did not substitute for ATP, indicating that ATP hydrolysis was required for binding. A protonmotive force was not involved in the energy requirement for binding. Other (hydrolyzable) nucleotides could substitute for ATP but were less effective at stimulating binding. Binding was stimulated by ATP generated inside chloroplasts even when an ATP trap was present to destroy external ATP. We conclude that internal ATP is required for stimulation of precursor binding to chloroplasts.